October 16, 2014

Getting Personalized: Therapeutic Targeting of Brain Tumors Gets Smarter Through Genomics

Genomic profiling helps guide drug therapy for select tumors

101334656-690

Personalized medicine services have been part of the toolbox of the Neurological Institute’s Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center since 1999, when 1p chromosome deletion testing was first offered. After adding more and more such services in the ensuing years, the center decided in 2013 to begin offering patients with select brain tumors the option of having their tumor tissue undergo genomic profiling to test for thousands of genetic abnormalities that could potentially impact their treatment.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“As we’ve offered more personalized medicine over the years, we’ve reached the point where it clearly makes sense to perform personalized tumor testing for genetic abnormalities in some cases rather than offer just a few specific tests,” says Gene Barnett, MD, MBA, Director of the Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center, which works closely with Cleveland Clinic’s Taussig Cancer Institute.

A road map to more rational drug selection

The Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center offers genomic profiling primarily for patients with new or recurrent glioblastoma, or atypical or malignant meningioma. It can provide a more rational basis on which to choose drug therapies, be they conventional or investigational, by offering data about particular characteristics that a patient’s tumor may have.

“The genomic profiling is looking for specific pathways within the tumor that we might target,” Dr. Barnett explains. “The results can help us avoid treatments that are not predicted to be helpful while suggesting other treatments that are more likely to be in the patient’s best interest.”

Historically, he says, patients have been treated with a standard drug paradigm or an investigational therapy without knowledge of whether their specific tumor would or would not benefit from that approach.

Tissue analysis at a glance

The tissue analysis uses next-generation sequencing to assess for hundreds of known cancer genes, and results are available in two to three weeks.

Advertisement

The process requires an adequate amount of tumor tissue, so testing cannot be performed for all eligible patients, particularly if they have had a needle biopsy. However, in some cases more invasive or larger biopsies can be performed so that tissue can be submitted for comprehensive testing.

The testing is very sensitive in finding many types of gene abnormalities, Dr. Barnett says. In some cancers, nearly two-thirds of all tissue samples assessed are found to have at least one actionable gene alteration.

Because the profile is of the tumor, not the patient’s own genome, it does not necessarily provide any information about heritability of the patient’s condition.

Where the future lies

The Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center is one of a select number of prominent centers across the country performing genomic profiling of brain tumors to guide treatment. “We are recognizing that an important part of the future lies in molecular testing of these tumors,” Dr. Barnett says.

That future will likely include changes to clinical guidelines to incorporate genomic testing guidance, he adds, but more experience and information are needed first. “This type of testing may very well become part of the standard of care for management of certain tumors, but we’re not there yet.”

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is contributing to the insights needed in the interim through participation in a clinical trial of genomic testing across a number of tumor types, including malignant meningiomas and other brain tumors.

No guarantees for individual patients

Meanwhile, Dr. Barnett and his Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center colleagues are focused on refining this personalized medicine service to their patients and assessing its benefits, as there is of course no guarantee that it will generate results useful for guiding therapy for any given patient.

“In some patients, the results have suggested new routes of treatment we would not have considered on our own,” Dr. Barnett says. “But it’s too early to say how effective it is.”

Related Articles

Cleveland Clinic physiatrist
March 22, 2024
The Vital Role of Oncology Rehabilitation (Podcast)

New program provides prehabilitation and rehabilitation services to help patients with cancer maintain and regain function

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Hematologist at Cleveland Clinic
March 14, 2024
Advances in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (Podcast)

Global R&D efforts expanding first-line and relapse therapy options for patients

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Dr. Jagadeesh at Cleveland Clinic
February 28, 2024
Treating Patient with Systemic T-Cell Lymphoma and Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A case study on the value of access to novel therapies through clinical trials

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

Ad