MAC Attack: Contending With Mitral Annular Calcification During Mitral Valve Surgery
Removing MAC is technically challenging, but it offers the best chance for optimal sizing and seating of a prosthetic valve for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Our experts share technical advice.
In the setting of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in a patient undergoing mitral valve replacement, addressing the calcium to achieve optimal sizing and seating of a prosthetic valve offers the best chance of favorable results. But special care must be taken to avoid releasing calcium fragments into the bloodstream or injury to the atrioventricular groove or a left circumflex coronary artery; these potential high-risk complications deter most surgeons from adequately addressing MAC.
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services Policy
Cleveland Clinic cardiothoracic surgeons have considerable experience with careful but sometimes aggressive handling of MAC, prompting an invited talk on the subject by Haytham Elgharably, MD, at the 2023 annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. In addition to discussing MAC assessment and tailoring the surgical approach to MAC severity, Dr. Elgharably provided procedural guidance for safely addressing this difficult situation.
“Removing MAC is technically challenging, but in many cases doing so offers the best outcome by providing a smoother and more pliable surface for implanting an appropriate-size prosthesis that meets the patient’s requirements of adequate blood flow and cardiac output,” Dr. Elgharably says. “With careful attention to presurgical planning and intraoperative technique, it can be done safely at centers of expertise.” Highlights of his presentation are recapped below.
Know your enemy
MAC severity must be thoroughly evaluated preoperatively so that the strategy can be individually tailored and planned. A multimodality imaging assessment is recommended, including:
Cardiac CT to obtain precise anatomic details of MAC involvement, such as the amount, density, depth and extent of the disease as well as its proximity to important structures like the left circumflex coronary artery.
Transthoracic, and usually transesophageal, echocardiography for functional assessment of the valve, as MAC can lead to valvular stenosis and/or regurgitation.
“MAC is a highly heterogeneous disease,” says cardiologist Serge Harb, MD, of Cleveland Clinic’s Section of Cardiovascular Imaging. “It can affect the annulus to varying degrees and may also extend to the mitral leaflets and surrounding myocardial tissue, resulting in various levels of functional impairment. To fully understand the anatomical details and functional implications, a comprehensive preoperative assessment using multimodality imaging is necessary.”
He adds that in certain complex cases, 3D printing of the heart is done based on imaging studies, providing the operator with a realistic model of MAC distribution.
Dr. Elgharably explains that preoperative findings determine the surgical approach. In most cases:
Posterior MAC may need a transseptal (extended) approach for better exposure, especially in reoperative cases.
Circumferential MAC may require transaortic debridement of the anterior component of the calcification.
Anterior MAC that extends into the aorto-mitral curtain and the aortic valve may require a so-called Commando exposure, in which the incision in the aorta is extended into the roof of the left atrium, exposing both the aortic and mitral valves and the cardiac fibrous skeleton in between (Figure 1). Patients with radiation heart disease are particularly prone to developing this most severe involvement.
Other preoperative planning includes prosthesis type and sizing, taking into account the patient’s body mass, functional status, symptoms, comorbidities and concomitant procedures.
Debride and reconstruct
Debridement starts with incising the posterior leaflet to expose the MAC, which is followed by sharp debridement of calcium fragments (Figure 2). After adequate debridement and sizing of the target prosthesis, reconstruction of the posterior annulus is necessary. “The degree of reconstruction required is based on the magnitude of debridement, which depends on the defect size in the annulus, the density of MAC (as determined by tapercut needle if it can go through), the quality of tissues that can be used to support the reconstruction, and the type and size of prosthesis needed,” Dr. Elgharably says.
Because the annulus may be weakened as a result, it may need to be reinforced to hold the prosthesis. In general, strategies for reconstruction include the following, according to MAC severity:
Mild MAC: Native mitral leaflets can usually be used. After any thickening or calcification of the posterior leaflet is removed, it may be possible to reuse the rest.
Moderate MAC: In some cases, the anterior leaflet can be flipped to cover the area of the posterior annular reconstruction or a felt strip can be placed.
Severe MAC (Figure 3): A bovine pericardial patch may be required.
For the replacement valve, Dr. Elgharably prefers to use a low-profile prosthesis with short struts, as it is easier to seat and avoids obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT).
Dr. Harb says that a well-anchored and optimally positioned prosthetic valve can prevent complications such as paravalvular leaks and LVOT obstruction. The complications can be detected by echocardiography, which he notes is the preferred test for monitoring these patients.
“The margin of error during mitral valve surgery in patients with MAC is small,” Dr. Elgharably concedes. “But as the U.S. patient population ages, MAC is becoming more of a problem, and having the ability to effectively address it grows more important.”
Two detailed overviews of surgical techniques used at Cleveland Clinic to address MAC have been published, one in Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2003;8:2-13) and the other in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2013;146:233-235).