June 5, 2018

Higher Blood-Based Tumor Burden Predicts Better Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic NSCLC Patients

Results based on early data from clinical trial

PrimaryPulmonaryCarcinoid

Thirty percent of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) do not have enough tumor tissue for molecular testing at diagnosis, so oncologists have begun to look elsewhere in the body for biomarkers that might shape how they select therapies.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Two recent retrospective studies showed that blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB), might be a promising noninvasive biomarker. The phase 2 POPLAR training set showed a longer progression-free survival (PFS) rate in patients with a TMB of 16 mutations or higher, and the phase 3 OAK study independently validated those results.

Now researchers have preliminary data from the first prospective clinical study, 1L NSCLC phase 2b F1RST, evaluating bTMB as a predictive biomarker of response with the immunotherapy drug atezolizumab in patients with mNSCLC.

“This is an early look at the data,” says Vamsidhar Velcheti, MD, Associate Director for Immuno-Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center . “It has shown so far that if the patient has more mutations circulating in their bloodstream, the immune system seems to recognize the cancer better.”

Dr. Velchiti recently presented the data at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting.

Advertisement

More mutations mean better response

For the preliminary assessment of the trial, Dr. Velcheti and colleagues looked at 78 patients, of which 58 had adequate blood samples with sufficient detection of circulating tumor DNA. These patients became the biomarker evaluable population (BEP).

Patients in the BEP were then divided into two groups, those with a bTMB of greater than 16 (11 patients) and those with a bTMB of less than 16 (47 patients).

With a minimum follow-up of six months, the median PFS was 9.5 months for the bTMB high group versus 2.8 months for the bTMB low group.

Overall survival in the BEP was 12.1 percent (seven of 58 patients) and disease control was 25.9 percent (15 of 58 patients). Overall survival in the bTMB high group was 36.4 percent (four of 11 patients), and 6.4 percent in the bTMB low group (three of 47 patients). Overall, patients tolerated the drug well with no new safety signals observed.

Advertisement

“The results show that this is an advance in the sense that we can use a blood-based biomarker to help identify patients who could potentially benefit from treatment with atezolizumab,” says Dr. Velcheti.

The preliminary data support the bTMB selection of patients in the ongoing phase 3 BFAST study. The BF1RST trial has completed enrollment at 153 patients and is ongoing.

Related Articles

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

24-CNR-4545611-CQD-Podcast-967×544
February 1, 2024
Possibilities of CRISPR Technology (Podcast)

Gene editing technology offers promise for treating multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies, as well as solid tumors

Disparities in multiple myeloma
January 25, 2024
Major Study Identifies Global Disparities in Drug Toxicity for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Study of 401,576 patients reveals differences in cancer burdens as well as overall survival

Dr. Shilpa Gupta
December 27, 2023
A New Standard Emerges in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Decades of First-Line Chemotherapy

Enfortumab plus pembrolizumab reduced risk of death by 53% compared with platinum-based chemotherapy

Ad