August 21, 2019

When Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Presents with Barlow’s Valve: A Case Study in Myectomy

Lessons in the combined presentation of two formidable conditions

Surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and Barlow’s valve involves notably complex procedures that most cardiothoracic surgeons rarely perform. So when mitral valve prolapse occurs in addition to HOCM, requiring both problems to be repaired, surgical complexity is increased substantially.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The combination of HOCM and Barlow’s is very challenging, since the standard treatment for one is counterproductive to the other,” says Cleveland Clinic cardiothoracic surgeon Per Wierup, MD, PhD.

Cleveland Clinic has become a national and international referral center for patients needing surgery for these conditions. Additionally, a minimally invasive robotic procedure for repairing Barlow’s valve is producing ideal results and is now standard procedure at Cleveland Clinic.

Surgical skill and experience allowed for a successful outcome in the following case of a patient needing a septal myectomy for HOCM along with mitral valve repair for Barlow’s.

Case vignette

In July 2019, a 38-year-old man was admitted to an area hospital after fainting. He had been diagnosed with HOCM seven months before and was started on beta-blocker therapy. As his symptoms worsened, the dosage was gradually raised, and he received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Despite these measures, he suffered multiple episodes of dizziness and syncope. With the latest episode, he requested a transfer to Cleveland Clinic.

He was seen in the emergency department by cardiologist Russell Raymond, DO. The patient was alert and awake, severely dyspneic and suffering from chest discomfort.

Advertisement

Upon auscultation, Dr. Raymond noted a loud murmur, indicating severe mitral valve insufficiency. Echocardiography confirmed severe HOCM with systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve (Figure) and an outflow tract gradient exceeding 100 mm Hg. In addition, there was significant mitral valve prolapse consistent with Barlow’s valve. Urgent surgery was recommended.

A team led by Dr. Wierup performed a septal myectomy and repaired the patient’s mitral valve using a novel technique that repositions the leaflets for virtually perfect coaptation without cutting or suturing (the technique is profiled in this recent Consult QD post). The repairs were checked with intraoperative echocardiography and found to be successful (Figure).

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Figure. Pre- and postoperative echocardiograms from the case patient. (Top row) The preoperative images depict septal hypertrophy with severe obstructive systolic anterior motion (SAM) and the Barlow type of mitral valve with excessive tissue and prolapse of the tall posterior leaflet. Note that the severe mitral regurgitation jet is centrally directed due to a combination of posterior prolapse (expected anteriorly directed jet) and the SAM-related regurgitation (which normally results in a posteriorly directed jet). (Bottom row) The postoperative images show results after the wide and apically directed myectomy together with papillary muscle reorientation and Gore-Tex chordal reconstruction of the prolapsing mitral valve. Note laminar flow in the left ventricular outcome tract and trivial mitral regurgitation.

Before the heart-lung machine was disconnected, isoproterenol was given to lower the patient’s blood pressure and provoke tachycardia. “This protocol provides an additional guarantee that the heart is working as it should, even in the most extreme situation,” Dr. Wierup explains. “We want the repair to endure for the rest of the patient’s life.”

The patient was discharged six days after surgery. After postoperative checkups with Drs. Wierup and Raymond, he has returned to his local cardiologist for echocardiographic follow-up every six to 12 months. Although the surgical repair is expected to be long-term, lifelong follow-up will be required.

Advertisement

Essential takeaways

Combined presentation of HOCM and Barlow’s valve is uncommon, and some physicians may be unfamiliar with best practices for treating these conditions. Drs. Wierup and Raymond offer the following general guidance when managing them concurrently:

  • Initial treatment for patients with obstructive symptoms related to HOCM is beta-blocker therapy. However, in many cases with intractable symptoms, surgery is indicated.
  • Decisions regarding surgery are nuanced and best made in consultation with cardiologists experienced in HOCM as well as cardiothoracic surgeons adept at myectomy and mitral valve repair techniques.
  • Septal myectomy should be performed only by an experienced surgeon. “If not enough tissue is removed, the procedure won’t help,” notes Dr. Wierup. “If too much is removed, the patient can develop a ventricular septal defect. Finding the right balance is key.”
  • Repair of Barlow’s valve using neocords eliminates obstruction in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) caused by a prolapsing anterior leaflet and corrects the coaptation. Avoiding cutting and resecting leaflet tissue prevents scarring and allows for a larger opening. The result is a near-perfect outcome.

“HOCM is a complex disease that requires nuanced care by experienced cardiologists and cardiac surgeons,” comments Milind Desai, MD, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist with a specialty interest in HOCM. “While medical therapy remains the initial line of treatment, a significant proportion of patients require surgical relief of LVOT obstruction. It is crucial to understand the mitral valve’s role in causing LVOT obstruction. In many patients, surgical myectomy alone may not be sufficient and may need to be combined with mitral valve repair techniques. A well-performed operation can provide long-lasting relief of symptoms and improved quality of life.”

Related Articles

intraoperative photo of robotic tracheobronchoplasty
June 22, 2023
Robotically Assisted Tracheobronchoplasty: A Case Study

Excessive dynamic airway collapse presenting as dyspnea and exercise intolerance in a 67-year-old

23-HVI-3766948 CQD 650×450
May 24, 2023
Case Report: 3-Month Journey From Health to Multiorgan Transplant to Discharge

Young man saved multiple times by rapid collaborative response

22-HVI-2987079 CQD 650×450
September 28, 2022
Off-Label Endovascular Intervention for Giant Aortic Arch Aneurysm: A Case Study

Necessity breeds innovation when patient doesn’t qualify for standard treatment or trials

22-HVI-3200903 CQD 650×450
September 13, 2022
Case Study: A Young Man With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy and Uncontrolled VT

After optimized medical and device therapy, is there a role for endocardial-epicardial VT ablation?

22-HVI-2958608-1 650×450
June 14, 2022
When the Ross Procedure Fails: Fifth Operation Offers Young Man a New Start

Fever and aortic root bleeding two decades post-Ross procedure

21-HVI-2595510_aortic-aneurysm_650x450
March 18, 2022
Case Study: When Lung Transplant Evaluation Reveals a Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

How to time the interventions, and how to manage anesthesia risks?

21-HVI-2128310-CQD-Complex-Reoperative-Case-Ross-Procedure-H1
June 3, 2021
The Ross Procedure in a Reoperative Setting: A Case Study

A potentially definitive repair in a young woman with multiple prior surgeries

20-HVI-2029540_Bypass5_Hero
December 29, 2020
MIDCAB: A Case Study in Its Benefits, Considerations for Patient Selection

Matching the minimally invasive CABG alternative to the right candidates

Ad