February 22, 2019

Why It’s Worth Your (and Your Patients’) Time to Verify Penicillin Allergy

19 in 20 will not have an allergic reaction

penicllium-mold_650x450

Nearly 10 percent of the U.S. population self-reports an allergy to penicillin, thereby limiting their access to this effective antibiotic. But true IgE-mediated allergy to penicillin is uncommon. Moreover, evidence accumulated over the past decade and a half suggests that alternative antibiotics are less effective and cause more complications than penicillins.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The answer to this problem is simple: Verify the accuracy of this diagnosis before the patient requires another antibiotic.

“In our experience, 19 of 20 patients will be skin-test negative and able to tolerate penicillin without an adverse reaction,” says David Lang, MD, Chairman of the Department of Allergy and Immunology at Cleveland Clinic and President-elect of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI).

Three reasons explain why the overwhelming majority of patients with a history of penicillin allergy will have negative skin tests, he says:

  1. The previous exposure to penicillin entailed a coincident adverse experience that did not reflect an allergic reaction.
  2. An adverse reaction occurred based on a non-IgE-mediated mechanism that did not include immunologic memory, making this reaction unlikely to occur on re-exposure to penicillin.
  3. An IgE-mediated (true allergic) reaction did occur; however, with avoidance of penicillins, the potential for an allergic reaction waned over time.

Challenging the diagnosis

With concerns about the effects of inappropriate antibiotic use on antimicrobial resistance, the AAAAI, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America looked into the issue. Their recent guidelines for evaluating patients for penicillin allergy are designed to help practitioners differentiate true allergic reactions from sensitivities and safely evaluate reported penicillin allergy. The guidelines delineate risk stratification for penicillin allergy evaluation.

Defining low-risk patients

Very low and low-risk patients include those reporting reactions that are unlikely to be allergic in nature, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, sleepless nights or rash without pruritis, as well as family history of penicillin allergy.

Advertisement

Unknown reactions not compatible with an IgE mechanism that occurred more than 10 years prior also render a patient low-risk.

These patients may be prescribed a course of amoxicillin or challenge dose of amoxicillin under observation.

“Most people are in this category: They simply had an adverse experience that was never verified as a true allergic reaction and resulted in their being mislabeled with a penicillin allergy,” says Dr. Lang.

Testing moderate-risk patients

Patients considered at moderate pre-test probability for allergic reaction with re-exposure to a penicillin should be skin tested. If the skin testing is negative, an amoxicillin challenge under observation should follow.

“These patients may have reported cutaneous symptoms such as urticaria, pruritis, angioedema or flushing, or a reaction with features of IgE, but not anaphylaxis. Symptoms also may be respiratory, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal in nature,” says Dr. Lang.

Advertisement

High-risk patients merit referral

Patients at high risk for penicillin allergy include those who experienced anaphylaxis, had reactions to multiple beta-lactam antibiotics or had a positive penicillin skin test. They should be referred to an allergist/immunologist for further evaluation.

A new level of detail

The new, triple society-authored guidelines contain comprehensive detail on symptoms, procedures and contraindications to testing, along with the management of drug-challenge reactions. The information is designed to provide clinicians with the knowledge necessary to be comfortable moving ahead with evaluation of patients with unverified penicillin allergy.

“It is in the best interest of these patients to determine whether they are truly allergic to penicillin. If they are not, this opens the door to using a class of antimicrobial agents with fewer complications, while increasing the likelihood of a improved healthcare outcomes,” says Dr. Lang.

Related Articles

Penicillin
July 19, 2022
Does My Patient Need an Allergy Evaluation for Penicillin Allergy?

A detailed clinical history should be obtained directly from patients to determine their risk of penicillin

650×450-Peanut-Allegy
June 8, 2020
New Drug to Prevent Peanut-Related Anaphylaxis: Essentials for Counseling Patients

Cleveland Clinic allergist and immunologist weighs in on its benefits and limitations

650×450-New-Image-Pulm
March 4, 2019
Asthma Controller Therapy: When to Consider Stepping Down

A new framework for a successful step-down

18-PUL-422-Lang-Hero-Image-650x450pxl
November 12, 2018
Omalizumab Can Block Aspirin-Provoked Respiratory Reaction During Aspirin Desensitization

Mechanism likely related to reduced capacity for release of leukotrienes

Doctor talking with patient
March 21, 2024
COVID-19: A Management Update

A review of IDSA and NIH guidelines

Image of lungs
February 28, 2024
New Cleveland Clinic-Led Research Highlights Novel Disease Monitoring Technique in Heart Failure

Volatile organic compounds have potential in heart failure diagnostics

Clinician performing bronchoscopy
February 16, 2024
Program Implemented to Standardize Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Data Ensures Quality Care

Caregivers are provided with real-time bronchoscopy patient findings

24-PUL-4507382-CQD-Portopulmonary-Hypertension-Hero-967×544
January 26, 2024
Portopulmonary Hypertension: A Focused Review for the Internist

Insights for diagnosing, assessing and treating

Ad