Advertisement
The clinical benefits of bariatric surgery in adult obese patients with type 2 diabetes are well-documented in studies such as Cleveland Clinic’s STAMPEDE (Surgical Therapy And Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) trial. The related bioethical issues are typically fairly straightforward.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Yet when it comes to two special populations — adolescents and adults with cognitive disabilities — the ethical considerations for bariatric surgery are more complex and multilayered, says Kathryn Weise, MD, MA, of Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Bioethics.
The standard of care at Cleveland Clinic is to seek the expertise of an ethicist on a case-by-case basis in either of these patient populations.
“Adults who don’t have cognitive issues are able to weigh the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery for themselves as long as they are given enough information to make a decision. From an ethics standpoint, the issues that arise for adolescents parallel those of adults but tend to be more complex,” says Dr. Weise. Two of her specialty areas for ethics consults include Cleveland Clinic Children’s and the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute.
Cleveland Clinic follows American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines in qualifying adolescent patients for weight-loss surgery. The guidelines focus on the patients’ BMI and obesity-related health issues; the duration of previous physician-supervised weight management attempts; and the attainment/near attainment of physiologic and skeletal maturity. It’s important to rule out underlying medical issues (e.g., thyroid deficiency) that could be treated nonsurgically.
Some ethical considerations that arise for adolescents include:
Advertisement
When cognitive impairment is an issue for adults or for adolescents (e.g., due to developmental delays), many ethical considerations for bariatric surgery are similar to those already discussed, Dr. Weise says. In short:
While a bioethicist is a primary facilitator for assessments of assent and permission, a multidisciplinary approach is standard at Cleveland Clinic, Dr. Weise says. The ethicist relies on input from bariatric surgeons, endocrinologists, psychologists and/or psychiatrists, and social workers.
“We consider the severity of patients’ existing health complications, and whether we believe they will be able to sustain any improvements,” she says. “Using a collaborative approach, we look at the health benefits and the psychological issues — and where the balance of all these considerations lies.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Embedded ethicists do much more than provide insight for medical decision-making
Probing how insurers, employers will use information
In rehabilitation medicine, the answer might require nuance
Mental health colleagues can provide much-needed perspective
Palliative care specialists know hard conversations can also be valuable ones
Variables affect nuances of the conversation
Authors discuss ethical challenges associated with sponsored genetic testing
Program focuses on nurturing ethics leaders in daily practice