Locations:
Search IconSearch
April 1, 2020/Cancer

New Genetic Test May Mean Better Outcomes in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Cleveland Clinic-developed test identifies variant of HSD3B1 gene

Lab test

A clinical laboratory test that may inform more rational and, thus, more effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been developed at Cleveland Clinic.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The genetic test was conceptualized by Cleveland Clinic researchers and validated and made available by the Molecular Pathology Section within Cleveland Clinic’s Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute. The test is used to interrogate the HSD3B1 gene and determine if a prostate cancer patient has inherited the adrenal-permissive (1245C) or adrenal-restrictive (1245A) allele.

“This is a specific testosterone-related genetic abnormality,” says medical oncologist and physician-researcher Nima Sharifi, MD, of Cleveland Clinic’s Lerner Research Institute, Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute and Taussig Cancer Institute.

“Men who inherit the androgen-permissive allele have more robust or active conversion from DHEA to testosterone or androgens, which is associated with quicker progression and decreased overall survival in prostate cancer patients,” he says.

As Dr. Sharifi explains, there are two forms of the allele; one that impedes conversion (restrictive) and the other that enhances it (permissive). With the latter form, in essence, the floodgates are open. Patients’ bodies rapidly turn adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). That, in turn, triggers clinical progression of prostate cancer to castration-resistant disease.

From bench-to-bedside

The development of the test is an outgrowth of more than seven years of research at Cleveland Clinic, which was documented in a recent review article in Endocrinology. It all stemmed from a basic observation in the lab about how genetics drive metabolism, or synthesis of androgens, leading to better or worse outcomes in prostate cancer.

Advertisement

Dr. Sharifi and colleagues went on to perform the first prospective clinical trial validation of the relationship between HSD3B1 status and clinical outcomes. It showed that patients with metastatic prostate cancer who have an adrenal-permissive variant of HSD3B1 are more likely to have aggressive, early castration-resistant disease and shorter survival. That work — the first prospective clinical trial validation of the relationship between HSD3B1 status and clinical outcomes — pointed the way to development of the new genetic test.

“Our research identified the first gain-of-function genetic mutation that increases the conversion of precursor steroids to DHT, permitting tumors to grow in the absence of gonadal testosterone,” says Dr. Sharifi. The adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 variant (1245C) allele encodes a stable form of the 3βHSD1 enzyme, which supports rapid conversion from DHEA to DHT and resultant high levels of DHT in tumor tissue. The stable enzyme accumulation increases androgen synthesis, enhances androgen receptor activation, thus, accelerating tumor proliferation.

The team also has performed retrospective studies on men with nonmetastatic and metastatic prostate cancer and showed an association between the adrenal-permissive variant and accelerated time to development of castration-resistant disease, reduced metastasis-free survival, and reduced overall survival.

This year, they published the first prospective research in this area, which supports the importance of HSD3B1 genotyping and clinical outcomes. The phase 3 trial of castration with or without docetaxel treatment in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer showed significantly shorter time to castration-resistant disease and significantly lower survival in men with low-volume disease who had the permissive allele.

Advertisement

“The clinical significance of this genetic variant, which has a disproportionately higher frequency in white men, has been independently validated multiple times,” says Dr. Sharifi. “Our latest findings suggest that the HSD3B1 genotype can be used to risk stratify white men with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer.”

Advancing care through collaboration with Molecular Pathology

Dr. Sharifi and his team shared these findings with members of the molecular pathology laboratory, and the team designed and launched an analytically validated HSD3B1 genotyping laboratory-developed test. The test is available today for ordering by physicians who manage prostate cancer patients.

Daniel H. Farkas, PhD, HCLD, Section Head, Molecular Pathology in Cleveland Clinic’s Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, notes that the partnership facilitated a true example of translational research. “A hypothesis was developed in the research environment, clinically validated in a trial, and the business-end of genotyping was analytically validated and launched in the clinical laboratory for use by physicians in managing their patients.”

He adds, “Together, we partnered in a bench-to-bedside advance that demonstrates the very best of how Cleveland Clinic practices precision and genomic medicine.”

The Molecular Pathology Section has dramatically expanded its capacity in recent years for precision medicine test offerings that use genotyping and next-generation sequencing to support molecular oncology applications, thus both teams were well-positioned to collaborate on this initiative.

Advertisement

Considering clinical applications of the test

Dr. Sharifi cautions that how to best use the information from the test to inform clinical decisions is still “not crystal clear,” but he expects that with time and experience, researchers and clinicians will gain a better understanding of its applications.

“It’s very clear that two men who have prostate cancer may have very different diseases, driven in major part by their genetics and the genetics of their tumors,” says Dr. Sharifi. The wave of the future, he believes, is therapies that are increasingly geared toward personalization and that leverage the interrelationship of hormonal and genetic regulation.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Squamous cell carcinoma
October 16, 2025/Cancer
Lymphovascular Invasion a Strong Predictor of Poor Prognosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Early detection, prognostication and intervention may improve outcomes

Dr. Khouri and patient
October 15, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
BCL-2 Inhibition in Plasma Cell Disorders: The Work Continues

Preliminary results suggest combination therapy with lisaftoclax improves survival with few adverse events in patients with AL amyloidosis and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Head and neck cancer illustration
October 6, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Blood-Based Assay Shows Promise for Personalizing Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer

New research demonstrates that cfDNA methylation patterns may noninvasively identify tumor hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head & neck image contouring
October 3, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Subspecialty Peer Review Improves Consistency, Quality and Safety in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy

Program reduces major contour changes and variations in organ-at-risk dosing across health system

Breast radiation therapy
October 2, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Study Confirms Breast Volume Preservation with Five-Day Radiation Therapy

No significant differences seen in breast volume loss between whole and partial breast treatment approaches

CT scan after prostate brachytherapy
October 1, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Clinical Outcomes for AI vs. Physician-Drawn Contours After Prostate Brachytherapy Comparable

Despite wide variations in contours, researchers find AI and physician methods yield equivalent results.

Dr. Mustafa Ali and patient
September 30, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Cytogenetic Response to Treatment Correlates With Long-Term Survival of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

New system refines classification of cytogenetic abnormalities at time of response assessment and their clinical significance

Ad