Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 21, 2020/Pulmonary/Lung Transplant

Prestigious Grant to Advance the U.S. Lung Transplant Allocation System

New risk-modeling approach to use microsimulations, incorporating day-to-day changes in patients

LUNG TRANSPLANT rev 2

Director of Lung Transplant Outcomes Maryam Valapour, MD, MPP, and a multidisciplinary team of researchers have received a four-year, $3 million R01 grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop an improved risk-modeling approach to help prioritize patients with advanced lung diseases for lung transplant.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The current U.S. lung allocation system

Currently patients with advanced lung disease are prioritized for lung transplant through the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system. The LAS estimates the benefit a patient may derive from a transplant by calculating predicted waitlist mortality and posttransplant survival. A patient with a higher LAS is given a higher priority for transplant.

The LAS, implemented in 2005, was a vast improvement of the prior system, which allocated donor lungs based on the amount of time accrued by a patient on the waiting list rather than his or her risk of impending mortality while waiting. Over time, small changes were implemented to improve the accuracy of the LAS, but it was clear to this team of investigators that there was room for more comprehensive and systemic improvement.

Dr. Valapour and her colleague Jarrod Dalton, PhD, a data scientist at Cleveland Clinic’s Lerner Research Institute, noted a major concern with the LAS system. It assumes that the relationship between clinical risk factors and mortality risk is fixed across all transplant candidates with end-stage lung disease. However, clinical observation shows that this is not the case.

The focus of the grant

With the award from the NIH, the team will work to develop a more dynamic system using microsimulations, a method that was not available when the LAS was first developed.

This new system will incorporate day-to-day changes in candidates’ pulmonary, cardiac and renal clinical measures, among others, and determine how their interactions impact a patient’s risk of mortality prior to and after transplant. The system also will account for interactions between patients’ race/ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic factors that may impact their survival — factors that are currently not part of the LAS.

Advertisement

This group of researchers will work to simulate different donor lung allocation strategies to better understand how patient- and population-level outcomes will be impacted in this new system. The team includes a transplant epidemiologist, statisticians, health economists and public policy experts and will involve collaboration with the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), the scientific arm of the U.S. transplant system funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration. Dr. Valapour serves as Senior Lung Transplant Investigator of SRTR and as a scientific advisor to U.S. lung transplant policymakers.

“Our goal is to work across disciplines to bring the best and brightest minds to advance lung transplantation,” says Dr. Valapour. “We are hopeful that this research will improve the survival of patients as they await transplant and beyond.”

Potential impact of this work

With an average posttransplant life expectancy of 6.7 years, lung transplant patients experience a shorter survival than patients with other solid organ transplants. More accurately identifying those who may have the highest transplant benefit will provide for rational changes to the current system to potentially maximize survival on the population level.

Other ongoing work in lung allocation

Improving the U.S. lung transplant allocation system is a major focus of research for this group, which has contributed to a number of recent changes. Two members of the team hold career development awards in this area. Wayne Tsuang, MD, MHS, holds an NIH K23 Career Development Award, studying the impact of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on patient outcomes. Carli Lehr, MD, holds the Cystic Fibrosis Harry Shwachman Clinical Investigator Award, studying methods to improve timely transplant access for cystic fibrosis patients.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Doctor looking at chest x-ray
August 29, 2024/Pulmonary/Lung Transplant
Lung Transplant Can Avert Significant Health Care Costs for Some Patients, Study Finds

Exploring the cost-effectiveness of end-of-life treatment options

Lung on computer screen
New Transplant Simulation Model Framework Addresses Limitations of Current Models

The agent-based model aims to improve prediction accuracy

lung transplant
January 10, 2024/Pulmonary/Lung Transplant
Revising the US Lung Allocation System to Improve Patient Access to Transplant

Cleveland Clinic pulmonologists aim to further lower waitlist times and patient mortality

Lung transplant
November 13, 2023/Pulmonary/Lung Transplant
Multiyear NHLBI Grant Supports Research on Lung Transplant Recipients Outcomes

New research aims to improve suboptimal lung transplant outcomes by “looking beyond the walls of hospitals”

lungs
Ongoing Research Needed to Improve Equity in Outcomes Following Lung Transplant

Data indicates transplant outcome disparities exist, but thoughtful planning is needed to address the problem

Physician discussion with patient
Patient Education Key for Effective Infection Prevention Post-Transplant

Counseling before and after transplantation can help patients navigate the balance between safety and practicality

Raynaud's disease leading to digital ulcer in a patient with scleroderma
Lung Transplantation in Rheumatic Lung Disease: The Importance of a Multidisciplinary Approach

Multisystem diseases require multi-disciplinary approach for the best care

Lung transplant
Consensus Document Offers New Guidance for Lung Transplants

Criteria reflect a rethinking of some contraindications

Ad