Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 8, 2021/Cancer

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases (Podcast)

Why it remains the mainstay for newly diagnosed metastases and tumors

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Advances · Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment Landscape for Brain Metastases

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Brain metastases are about 10 times more common than primary brain tumors in adults, so it is really important that medical oncologists and primary care doctors are tuned into the possibility of their patients with cancer developing brain metastases,” says neurosurgeon Gene Barnett, MD, MBA, Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center. “The treatment options are better if we get to these metastases when they are smaller and/or asymptomatic.”

One treatment option is stereotactic radiosurgery, a minimally invasive intervention that uses targeted radiation beams to treat brain tumors and other abnormalities. In a recent episode of Cleveland Clinic’s Cancer Advances podcast, Dr. Barnett discusses the evolution of traditional surgical approaches for treating patients with brain metastases and the ability of stereotactic radiosurgery to deliver superior outcomes. He provides insight on the following:

  • Presenting symptoms of brain metastases
  • The range of treatment options, from surgical interventions to medication and radiation therapies
  • A step-by-step look at the stereotactic radiosurgery procedure
  • The emergence and promising results of neoadjuvant stereotactic surgery
  • The importance of combining systemic therapies with radiosurgery for tumor control

Click the podcast player above to listen to the episode now, or read on for a short edited excerpt.

Excerpt from the podcast

Podcast host Dale Shepard, MD, PhD: What does [stereotactic radiosurgery] look like from a patient perspective, in terms of what their experience is as they undergo the treatment and how well they’re likely to do? When I see patients in clinic and I tell them they have a lung met or a liver met, they’re not nearly as frightened as when I tell them they have a brain met. So how do we reassure patients?

Advertisement

Dr. Barnett: Well, I think that’s totally understandable because people understand the brain is who we are and allows us to do what we want to do. Many people know, or know of, people who have had brain tumors and have not done well. I think the point of reassurance is that we can actually do a really good job of controlling brain metastases these days with radiosurgery, to the extent that most people who have brain metastases don’t die from them — rather, they die of their systemic disease and their brain disease is under control. For the vast majority of brain metastases, the control rate is upwards of 90% to 95%. And with the staged technique, the control is typically durable. So, I think that giving patients the facts should be consoling. You don’t want to sugarcoat things, but the facts are that the outcome is actually probably a lot better than what they were thinking.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Medical illustration of blood cells
August 25, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

Understanding Rebalancing Agents

Newer class of medications evolves care models for patients with hemophilia

Patient greeting physician
August 12, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

Classical Hematology 2.0

Improving access to specialists

Large meningiolma
August 6, 2026/Cancer/Brain Tumor

Case Study: Patient with Large Meningioma Thriving After Treatment

Dotatate PET/CT scan and molecular testing informed treatment trajectory

Young couple cooking
July 27, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Empowering Cancer Survivors through Lifestyle Medicine

A proactive, framework-based approach

Physician checking patient's heart rate
July 15, 2026/Cancer

First-Generation BTK Inhibitors Associated with Higher Risk of Cardiac Events

Patients on ibrutinib were more than twice as likely to experience atrial fibrillation or heart failure than those on second-generation alternatives.

Thyroid cancer illustration
July 13, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

New ASCO Guidelines Help Clinicians Navigate Rapid Shifts in Thyroid Cancer Treatment

Expert recommendations introduce use of targeted agents

AML cells in blood flow
July 10, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Ziftomenib + Chemotherapy Drives Deep Remission in Frontline NPM1-m/KMT2A-r AML

Combination therapy may soon represent new standard of care

Researcher with microscope
June 26, 2026/Cancer

Testosterone May Offer Anti-Tumor Activity in Glioblastoma

Research findings offer clues for improving disease outcomes in men

Ad