Reconsidering axillary lymph node dissection as well as depth of surgical margins
Studies have indicated that less-invasive approaches are possible for many patients with low-risk breast cancer, according to a recent review published in JCO Oncology Practice. Notably, many patients can opt for sentinel lymph node biopsies over axillary lymph mode dissection. In addition, the oncology community has been re-examining the level of margins needed in lumpectomies.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Wider margins mean more surgeries, and greater physical and psychological impacts. Removing more tissue affects the ability to preserve the size and shape of the breast. Additionally, each excision brings anxiety as well as higher costs for patients.
Thanks to a better understanding of tumor biology, clinicians can make more informed decisions about the role that surgery plays in treating low-risk breast cancer. The JCO Oncology Practice article authors noted that "surgical approaches have continued to advance, with two major areas of deintensification being surgical margins and management of the axilla." For example, the 21-gene assay OnctotypeDx is often used for determination of adjuvant systemic therapy and may help de-escalate axillary surgical recommendations.
“When it comes to surgical margin status, clinicians are moving beyond the belief that ’more is better’ for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer,” says Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute Breast Surgeon Vincent Wu, MD.
In a retrospective study of more than 50,000 patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer, the difference in local recurrence rates was negligible between those with "no tumor on ink" vs. those with wider margins. Data shows that there appears to be no statistical benefit for having margins in excess of 1 mm for patients with early invasive disease.
Since this study was reported out, the Society of Surgical Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Radiation Oncology now concur that margins should be 2 mm for patients with DCIS. This recommendation has a major impact on patients by reducing the need for re-incisions.
Advertisement
The other major advancement in surgical interventions involves axillary surgery. Previously, virtually all patients with breast cancer had to go through axillary lymph node dissection. This procedure comes with a 20-50% risk of lymphedema and up to a 75% risk of dysfunction of the arm or shoulder.
Performing sentinel lymph node biopsies make it possible for many patients who are node negative to avoid axillary lymph node dissection. Questions remain about whether all patients with positive sentinel nodes still require this procedure.
Advertisement
The current Society for Surgical Oncology guidelines support omitting sentinel lymph mode biopsies for patients 70 years or older who are clinically node-negative if they have early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Since the standard of care for breast cancer involves a combination of radiation, surgery and systemic therapy, it only makes sense that deintensification decisions should involve specialists from all three disciplines. Deintensification in one realm will certainly impact the other treatment modalities. It's prudent to coordinate multiple disciplines in the early decision-making and to keep lines of communication open throughout treatment to make adjustments in concert with one another as needed.
Learn about deintensification of systemic therapy for low-risk breast cancer.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation and Partial Breast Irradiation Reduce Many Toxicities
Robotic-Assisted Procedures Offer Breakthroughs in Lymphedema Treatment After Breast Cancer Surgery
Best practices for reducing toxicities
Partnerships with local social service agencies key to program success
Findings may guide future research and personalized treatments
Real-world results reporting aims to make treatments safer and more effective
Ongoing clinical validation in diverse populations refine breast cancer risk substratification
Improved outcomes stem from shifting priorities and a deeper understanding of the anatomy