Clinical nurses often presume what might happen with a patient: She’ll probably need assisted living upon discharge. I doubt he’ll head home today due to increasing ammonia levels. But what happens when nurses are asked to document such predictions about their patients’ outcomes? Mark McClelland, DNP, RN, CPHQ, a nurse scientist in Cleveland Clinic’s Office of Nursing Research and Innovation, conducted a phenomenological study to find out.
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Mark McClelland, DNP, RN, CPHQ
“I believe that the nursing process mirrors the scientific process,” says Dr. McClelland. “I’ve got a strong interest in helping nurses develop a scientific approach to their care.” A very important part of a scientist’s work is making predictions, yet there is very little information in the literature about nurses making predictions about their patients’ outcomes.
Dr. McClelland’s team completed an initial study of 15 nurses on eight medical-surgical and step-down units in four hospitals. The purpose of the “Make Two Predictions” study was to explore the following questions:
Participants were asked to follow the Predict, Reconcile, Reflect and Learn (PRRL) Process and document it in a research log for two to three weeks. Developed by the research team, the PRRL Process is as follows:
During the data collection period, nurses made a variety of predictions – some accurate and others not. For instance, one prediction was that a patient would be able to control his blood sugar without insulin upon discharge. (That proved accurate.) Another prediction was that a patient would develop aspiration pneumonia. (That was not accurate.)
Using a semi-structured interview guide, Dr. McClelland interviewed participants upon completion of data collection. Although the data is still being analyzed, five themes emerged.
The next steps are to further analyze and characterize the predictions made by the nurses in this study to create a prediction typology. Then Dr. McClelland would like to repeat the study engaging all the nurses on several units to learn how the social network affects the PRRL Process.
Ultimately, the PRRL Process could be a valuable educational tool for nurses. “Because we’ve gotten evidence that this changes thinking a bit, I believe the process may be used to assess a nurse’s competency and help teach younger nurses how to view patients differently,” says Dr. McClelland.
Photo credit Annie O’Neil.
Study shows ultrasound can be valuable tool for improving patient satisfaction by reducing failed IV insertions
New system uses vital signs to predict need for further intervention
Findings reveal personal and professional factors that influence nurses’ interest in medical research
Nurse scientists bridge divide between bench and bedside
Individual and population factors play a role
Study looks at cardiopulmonary arrest and activation rates
Video education and nurse-led reinforcement help with fall risk awareness
Further research into collaborations may help strengthen nursing science