Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 2, 2019/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee

A Look at Subsequent Knee and Hip Replacements: Who Is at Risk and When to Intervene?

Study follows patients for almost a decade after primary knee or hip arthroplasty

19-ORT-1340-Arthroplasty-CQD-Hero

A research team, led by an orthopaedic surgeon at Cleveland Clinic, used longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) to investigate how physicians may better predict if and when a patient is at increased risk of developing contralateral arthroplasty after a total knee or hip replacement. These new insights may be key to developing earlier interventions for at-risk patients.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD, staff in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and senior author of the study, notes that previous studies have analyzed retrospectively collected data from a single institution or surgeon. But data collected and maintained by the OAI, a public-private multicenter consortium, allowed the researchers to validate previous findings and analyze prognostic factors with a higher level of evidence.

Who is at risk for subsequent arthroplasties?

The investigators identified 332 patients who underwent their first total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 132 patients who underwent their first total hip arthroplasty (THA) using data that followed the patients for eight years after their initial procedure. Researchers examined the patients at intervals of one, five and eight years.

Results demonstrated that after a TKA, the incidence of contralateral TKA was 14% at one year (95% CI 10 to 18), 33% at five years (95% CI 27 to 39) and 40% at eight years (95% CI 31 to 49). Approximately one in 25 of these patients would later undergo a THA within this eight-year time frame.

After a THA, the incidence of contralateral THA was 9% at one year (95% CI 4 to 13), 18% at five years (95% CI 10 to 26) and 32% at eight years (95% CI 15 to 48). Notably, one in 10 would later receive TKA in the same eight-year period, outpacing their counterparts who required a subsequent THA after the initial TKA. These results were striking, but not surprising to investigators. “One in three patients received a contralateral total knee replacement at the five-year interval. The data suggest that we should be narrowing in on this group,” says Dr. Piuzzi.

Advertisement

The study also finds that medial joint space is a risk factor for developing contralateral TKA. In fact, a 1 mm loss of joint space increased the likelihood of TKA by 42% at 4.1° of varus alignment (HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.29 to 1.56]; p = 0.005), 26% at 1.6° of varus alignment (HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.51]; p = 0.005), and 14% at 0.7° of valgus alignment (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.89 to 1.46]; p =0.005). “This has a direct clinical implication for physicians as it’s a unique data point that may be used to determine risk for an individual patient,” he says.

Developing earlier interventions for high-risk groups

It’s understood that hip and knee replacements are generally successful surgeries, however, there are many initiatives to develop new tools and innovations to further optimize outcomes and minimize risk. Dr. Piuzzi hopes continued investigation will lead to a better understanding of the disease and help surgeons develop interventions for high-risk patients to modify the natural progression of the disease – and delay or avoid joint replacement altogether.

“Ultimately, our goal would be to identify high-risk groups of patients, particularly the ones who are likely to require a TKA or THA five years post-operatively and assess early intervention strategies that may improve their quality-of-life,” he says. “This would also help clinicians to counsel patients about the progression of their disease.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Anterior-based muscle-sparing hip replacement
February 5, 2026/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Surgery Offers Another Option for Hip Replacement

How it’s similar but different from the direct anterior approach

Periprosthetic joint infection after knee replacement
January 27, 2026/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
The Global Search for Better Care of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Collaboration must cross borders and disciplines

Woman holding knee
January 8, 2026/Orthopaedics/Sports Health
ACL Injuries in Female Athletes: Understanding the Higher Risks and Lower Return-to-Play Rates

Systematic review of MOON cohorts demonstrates a need for sex-specific rehab protocols

Total hip replacement
December 31, 2025/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
3 Innovations That Are Improving Precision in Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty

Should surgeons forgo posterior and lateral approaches?

Chiropractic care
December 29, 2025/Orthopaedics/News & Insights
Collaborative Musculoskeletal Care: The Role for Chiropractors

How chiropractors can reduce unnecessary imaging, lower costs and ease the burden on primary care clinicians

Shoulder dislocation x-ray
December 24, 2025/Orthopaedics/Sports Health
Adolescent Shoulder Dislocations: The Case for Earlier Surgical Intervention

Why shifting away from delayed repairs in high-risk athletes could prevent long-term instability and improve outcomes

Hip replacement and heart illustration
November 17, 2025/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Patients With Heart Failure Report Excellent Outcomes After Hip or Knee Replacement

Multidisciplinary care can make arthroplasty a safe option even for patients with low ejection fraction

Lesion in acetabulum
November 3, 2025/Orthopaedics/Tumor
Fighting Pain and Fracture: Improving the Care of Metastatic Acetabular Lesions

Percutaneous stabilization can increase mobility without disrupting cancer treatment

Ad