October 2, 2019/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee

A Look at Subsequent Knee and Hip Replacements: Who Is at Risk and When to Intervene?

Study follows patients for almost a decade after primary knee or hip arthroplasty

19-ORT-1340-Arthroplasty-CQD-Hero

A research team, led by an orthopaedic surgeon at Cleveland Clinic, used longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) to investigate how physicians may better predict if and when a patient is at increased risk of developing contralateral arthroplasty after a total knee or hip replacement. These new insights may be key to developing earlier interventions for at-risk patients.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD, staff in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and senior author of the study, notes that previous studies have analyzed retrospectively collected data from a single institution or surgeon. But data collected and maintained by the OAI, a public-private multicenter consortium, allowed the researchers to validate previous findings and analyze prognostic factors with a higher level of evidence.

Who is at risk for subsequent arthroplasties?

The investigators identified 332 patients who underwent their first total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 132 patients who underwent their first total hip arthroplasty (THA) using data that followed the patients for eight years after their initial procedure. Researchers examined the patients at intervals of one, five and eight years.

Results demonstrated that after a TKA, the incidence of contralateral TKA was 14% at one year (95% CI 10 to 18), 33% at five years (95% CI 27 to 39) and 40% at eight years (95% CI 31 to 49). Approximately one in 25 of these patients would later undergo a THA within this eight-year time frame.

After a THA, the incidence of contralateral THA was 9% at one year (95% CI 4 to 13), 18% at five years (95% CI 10 to 26) and 32% at eight years (95% CI 15 to 48). Notably, one in 10 would later receive TKA in the same eight-year period, outpacing their counterparts who required a subsequent THA after the initial TKA. These results were striking, but not surprising to investigators. “One in three patients received a contralateral total knee replacement at the five-year interval. The data suggest that we should be narrowing in on this group,” says Dr. Piuzzi.

The study also finds that medial joint space is a risk factor for developing contralateral TKA. In fact, a 1 mm loss of joint space increased the likelihood of TKA by 42% at 4.1° of varus alignment (HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.29 to 1.56]; p = 0.005), 26% at 1.6° of varus alignment (HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.51]; p = 0.005), and 14% at 0.7° of valgus alignment (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.89 to 1.46]; p =0.005). “This has a direct clinical implication for physicians as it’s a unique data point that may be used to determine risk for an individual patient,” he says.

Developing earlier interventions for high-risk groups

It’s understood that hip and knee replacements are generally successful surgeries, however, there are many initiatives to develop new tools and innovations to further optimize outcomes and minimize risk. Dr. Piuzzi hopes continued investigation will lead to a better understanding of the disease and help surgeons develop interventions for high-risk patients to modify the natural progression of the disease – and delay or avoid joint replacement altogether.

Advertisement

“Ultimately, our goal would be to identify high-risk groups of patients, particularly the ones who are likely to require a TKA or THA five years post-operatively and assess early intervention strategies that may improve their quality-of-life,” he says. “This would also help clinicians to counsel patients about the progression of their disease.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Blue illustration of knee with torn ACL in red
February 29, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Aspiration and Corticosteroid Injection Are Safe After ACL Injury

Study reports zero infections in nearly 300 patients

Swollen knee with scar
February 26, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Is Joint Inflammation and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty an Infection or Gout?

How to diagnose and treat crystalline arthropathy after knee replacement

Close up of the one round white pill in female hand.
January 4, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Patients Use Less Pain Medication After Robot-Assisted Hip Replacement Compared With Conventional Surgery

Reduced narcotic use is the latest on the list of robotic surgery advantages

The Featured Image for the post
November 29, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
What We’ve Learned From 10,000 Robot-Assisted Total Joint Replacements

Cleveland Clinic orthopaedic surgeons share their best tips, most challenging cases and biggest misperceptions

23-ORI-4156360 CQD 650×450
September 22, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
3 Myths of Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

How it actually compares to posterior and lateral approaches

22-ORI-3183858 CQD 650×450
September 20, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Could Be Right for 50% of Patients With Osteoarthritis

When procedure is performed by high-volume surgeons, outcomes are comparable to total knee replacement

23-ORI-4156359 CQD 650×450
September 8, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
BEAR Implant: The Missing Link in Improving ACL Repair

Clot substitute helps rejoin the stumps of a torn ligament

Ad