December 7, 2015

Analysis of Molecular Mutations in AML and MDS Have Prognostic Impact on Outcomes After Allogeneic HCT

Complex karyotypes, TET2 mutations lower survival rates

ASHbanner_690x380

For patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the only therapy with curative potential is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Yet survival after transplant is poor, and identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from HCT remains challenging.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Hamilton_inset

Now next-generational sequencing analysis by Cleveland Clinic researchers reveals that molecular mutations in AML and MDS have prognostic impact on outcomes after allogeneic HCT. The study found that both complex karyotypes and TET2 mutations in MDS and AML were associated with poor overall survival (OS) after transplant. Results of the study were presented at the 57th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition in December.

“In the past year, scientific evidence has begun to accumulate about the prognostic significance of molecular mutations in AML and MDS,” says lead researcher Betty Hamilton, MD, an associate staff physician in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders and Blood and Marrow Transplant Program. Yet, data on the effect of molecular mutations on allogeneic HCT outcomes among AML and MDS patients was lacking, she says.

Researchers examine 60 most commonly mutated genes in myeloid neoplasias

In their study, researchers performed mutational analyses—using a panel of the 60 most commonly mutated genes in myeloid neoplasias—on 123 patients with MDS and AML, who subsequently underwent HCT. Mutations were analyzed individually and by molecular pathway, and the median follow-up on patients in the study was 35 months.

Seventy-two percent of the AML and MDS patients in the study had at least one mutation—most frequently in STAG2 (10.2 percent), TET2 (9.8 percent), ASXL1 (8.1 percent) and RUNX1 (8.1 percent). In multivariable analysis, complex karyotype was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR=2.7) and poor relapse-free survival (HR=3.9). TET2 mutations were associated with a complete response prior to transplant, but after HCT, patients with TET2 mutations had poor overall survival (HR=2.4) in multivariate analysis. The presence of any of the DNA methylation mutations (TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2) was also associated with poor relapse-free survival (HR=1.7).

Advertisement

The results of the study indicated that the three-year OS among patients in the study with a complex karyotype was 23 percent. Yet OS was far better among those without a complex karyotype–48 percent. In patients with TET2 mutations, OS was just 14 percent, but in those without TET2, OS was 46 percent.

Mutational analysis of AML, MDS patients could become standard of care

“Many studies show that patients with complex karyotype have poorer overall survival. Yet our study’s finding about the prognostic importance of TET2 mutations is interesting—particularly since it was associated with treatment response before transplant,” Dr. Hamilton says. She noted that this finding will need to be confirmed and validated in other studies.

Dr. Hamilton and fellow researchers at Cleveland Clinic are planning a larger study on the prognostic significance of molecular mutations in AML and MDS patients, using tissue samples from 200 to 300 patients, she says. Researchers will analyze molecular mutations in these AML and MDS patients over time—at the time of diagnosis, after initial treatment, at the time of relapse, and after use of salvage chemotherapy or transplant.

“This research work will help us understand the significance of molecular mutations in AML and MDS, and their potential effects on patient prognosis and outcomes,” Dr. Hamilton says. “It also shows us that performing mutational analysis for AML and MDS patients may eventually become a standard of care.”.

Advertisement

Dr. Hamilton can be reached at hamiltb2@ccf.org or 216.445.7580.

Related Articles

Hematologist at Cleveland Clinic
March 14, 2024
Advances in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (Podcast)

Global R&D efforts expanding first-line and relapse therapy options for patients

Dr. Jagadeesh at Cleveland Clinic
February 28, 2024
Treating Patient with Systemic T-Cell Lymphoma and Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A case study on the value of access to novel therapies through clinical trials

Treating older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
January 18, 2024
Trial for Patients 75 and Older with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Helps Address Care Inequities

Multiple Cleveland Clinic sites to participate in National Cancer Institute trial comparing treatment regimens for newly diagnosed patients

23-CNR-4221120 ASH 2023 Graphics-CQD
December 4, 2023
Ten ASH Presentations You Don’t Want to Miss

Cleveland Clinic oncologists’ selected abstracts

23-CNR-3741790-CQD-Hero-650×450 cell mobilization
April 24, 2023
Plerixafor is Effective for Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Patients with AL Amyloidosis

On-demand stem cell mobilizer is an effective salvage strategy

CAR T-cell therapy
April 5, 2023
Insights About CAR T-Cell Therapy

Dispelling myths and sharing practical experiences

CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma
March 13, 2023
Ide-CEL CAR T-Cell Therapy Effective in Multiple Myeloma Among Patients with Comorbidities

Research indicates strong rationale for expanding trial eligibility criteria

22-CNR-3245747-CQD-Hero-650×450 aplastic anemia
September 13, 2022
Clinical and Molecular Determinants of Clonal Evolution in Aplastic Anemia and Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Retrospective study yields clues to understanding risk of secondary myeloid neoplasms

Ad