Locations:
Search IconSearch
April 29, 2021/Cancer

Early Pelvic Drain Removal Does Not Increase Infection Risk

Challenging an old surgical standard

18-DDI-5519-Rectal-Cancer-Hero-Image-650x450pxl

The early removal of pelvic drains following abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is not associated with increased pelvic or perineal surgical site infections (SSI), according to a retrospective study presented at the American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting. This finding challenges the longstanding surgical dogma that leaving pelvic drains helps prevent SSI or perineal wound complications after APR and encourages further prospective trials investigating the omission of pelvic drains following APR.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Recently, prospective trials have shown that pelvic drains are not helpful in the context of low anterior resection for rectal cancer,” says David Liska, MD, Director of the Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia at Cleveland Clinic’s Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute and senior author of the study. “And yet, most surgeons still use them, hoping to reduce pelvic fluid collection and infection, or perineal wound complications but with no data supporting their use.”

Currently, timing of drain removal varies widely and is sometimes guided by arbitrary levels of drainage volume. Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) call for avoiding drains or removing them early to accelerate recovery and patient discharge.

Morbidity increases with drain time

Researchers reviewed all rectal cancer patients treated with APR at Cleveland Clinic from 2009 to 2017 and tracked preoperative patient factors, operative details and 30-day outcomes. They separated patients whose pelvic drains were removed after volume decreased to < 150 mL and those with drain removal with output ≥ 150 mL.

Of 139 patients included, 53 had drain volume ≥ 150 mL on the day preceding removal, and 86 had removal following a volume decrease below < 150 mL. The high-volume removal group had pelvic drains removed earlier (median 4 days vs. 6 days, P < 0.001) than the group with lower drain volume upon removal. They also more frequently had minimally invasive surgery (69.8% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.001) and were more often treated within the context of an ERP (39.6% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.002).

Advertisement

The early drain removal group had lower overall morbidity (43.4% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.009) and incisional SSI (7.55% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.045). Researchers found no significant difference in pelvic and/or perineal SSI between the groups (11.3% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.168). When controlling for differences in the use of minimally invasive surgery and ERP, early drain removal was not associated with increased pelvic or perineal SSI.

“Instead, we found that delaying drain removal was actually associated with an increase in morbidity,” says Dr. Liska (RR = 1.48, P < 0.001).

Deconstructing the dogma

These results are in line with findings of recent prospective trials that pelvic drains after low anterior resection for rectal cancer are not of benefit to the patient. “We demonstrated that removing the drains sooner, regardless of drainage volume, confers no disadvantage,” says Dr. Liska. “These findings lay the groundwork for future prospective trials and get us one step closer to deconstructing the surgical dogma of routinely using pelvic drains after abdominoperineal resections for patients with rectal cancer.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Khorana
April 25, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Molecular Insights into Early-Onset Biliary Tract Cancer (Podcast)

A call for awareness about the importance of genomic testing

Dr. Melenhorst
April 24, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Explore Developments in CAR T-Cell Therapy for CLL (Podcast)

Discussing research into improving CAR T-cell therapy efficacy

Dr. Cherian
April 23, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
De-intensifying Radiation Therapy in Low-Risk Breast Cancer

Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation and Partial Breast Irradiation Reduce Many Toxicities

Pathology image
April 22, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Patient Case Study: Second Opinion Reveals Misdiagnosed Cancer

Patient receives liver transplant and a new lease on life

Clinician talking with patient
April 21, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Hematology Clinic Created to Support Spanish-Speaking Population

Lutheran Hospital team brings emerging treatments to community setting

Dr. Pennell and patient
April 10, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
BiTE Therapy Emerges for Treating Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Hybrid treatment model helps improve cancer care access

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
April 8, 2025/Cancer
Building on Initial Trial Data about New Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Treating Colorectal Cancer

Insights indicate that treatment may be beneficial beyond MSI-H tumors

Dr. Gerds with a patient
April 7, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Positive Results from Prospective, Randomized, Phase 3 Registrational Trial of Pelabresib + Ruxolitinib for JAK Inhibitor-Naive Myelofibrosis

Combination therapy doubles the number of meaningful spleen volume responses over monotherapy

Ad