April 29, 2021/Cancer

Early Pelvic Drain Removal Does Not Increase Infection Risk

Challenging an old surgical standard

18-DDI-5519-Rectal-Cancer-Hero-Image-650x450pxl

The early removal of pelvic drains following abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is not associated with increased pelvic or perineal surgical site infections (SSI), according to a retrospective study presented at the American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting. This finding challenges the longstanding surgical dogma that leaving pelvic drains helps prevent SSI or perineal wound complications after APR and encourages further prospective trials investigating the omission of pelvic drains following APR.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Recently, prospective trials have shown that pelvic drains are not helpful in the context of low anterior resection for rectal cancer,” says David Liska, MD, Director of the Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia at Cleveland Clinic’s Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute and senior author of the study. “And yet, most surgeons still use them, hoping to reduce pelvic fluid collection and infection, or perineal wound complications but with no data supporting their use.”

Currently, timing of drain removal varies widely and is sometimes guided by arbitrary levels of drainage volume. Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) call for avoiding drains or removing them early to accelerate recovery and patient discharge.

Morbidity increases with drain time

Researchers reviewed all rectal cancer patients treated with APR at Cleveland Clinic from 2009 to 2017 and tracked preoperative patient factors, operative details and 30-day outcomes. They separated patients whose pelvic drains were removed after volume decreased to < 150 mL and those with drain removal with output ≥ 150 mL.

Of 139 patients included, 53 had drain volume ≥ 150 mL on the day preceding removal, and 86 had removal following a volume decrease below < 150 mL. The high-volume removal group had pelvic drains removed earlier (median 4 days vs. 6 days, P < 0.001) than the group with lower drain volume upon removal. They also more frequently had minimally invasive surgery (69.8% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.001) and were more often treated within the context of an ERP (39.6% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.002).

The early drain removal group had lower overall morbidity (43.4% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.009) and incisional SSI (7.55% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.045). Researchers found no significant difference in pelvic and/or perineal SSI between the groups (11.3% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.168). When controlling for differences in the use of minimally invasive surgery and ERP, early drain removal was not associated with increased pelvic or perineal SSI.

“Instead, we found that delaying drain removal was actually associated with an increase in morbidity,” says Dr. Liska (RR = 1.48, P < 0.001).

Advertisement

Deconstructing the dogma

These results are in line with findings of recent prospective trials that pelvic drains after low anterior resection for rectal cancer are not of benefit to the patient. “We demonstrated that removing the drains sooner, regardless of drainage volume, confers no disadvantage,” says Dr. Liska. “These findings lay the groundwork for future prospective trials and get us one step closer to deconstructing the surgical dogma of routinely using pelvic drains after abdominoperineal resections for patients with rectal cancer.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Blood clot
May 17, 2024/Cancer/Research
Managing the Risks of Venous Thromboembolisms in Patients with Cancer

Oral anticoagulants may be beneficial but need to be balanced against bleeding risks

Director of the Novel Cancer Therapeutics Center
May 2, 2024/Cancer/Innovations
Oncology Pharmacovigilance Clinic Expands Specialties

First-of-its-kind clinic for immune-related adverse events supports oncologists in managing severe side effects

Scrambler therapy for nerve pain
April 29, 2024/Cancer
Scrambler Technology Life Changing for Many Patients with Neuropathic Pain

Novel therapy “retrains” the brain to disrupt pain signals

Women's health physician
April 16, 2024/Cancer
Watching Out for Primary Ovarian Insufficiency

An underdiagnosed condition in patients with cancer

Fluorescent imaging during small bowel surgery
April 11, 2024/Cancer/Surgical Oncology
Fluorescence Imaging Augments Surgical Inspection and Palpation for Small Bowel Carcinoid Tumors

Study demonstrates superior visualization of occult primary lesions

microwave ablation of liver tumor
150-Watt, Single-Antenna Microwave Ablation System Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy

New device offers greater tumor control for malignant liver lesions

viral-induced cancer
April 3, 2024/Cancer
Mechanism of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) May Serve as Clue to More Effective Treatment

Cleveland Clinic researchers discover what drives – and what may halt – virus-induced cancer

Ad