Locations:
Search IconSearch
November 14, 2016/Cancer

Genetic Risk Assessment for Breast Cancer Using Multi-gene Panel Testing

A New Paradigm

By Mariam AlHilli, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

On June 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made a landmark decision that broke the monopoly on BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene testing held by Myriad Genetics. Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 alone and in combination with other genes is now available through several companies.

Traditionally, individuals susceptible to hereditary cancers were screened based on history and offered testing for mutations in a single gene or a set of genes associated with a particular syndrome (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2 for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer or mismatch repair genes for Lynch syndrome). Today, advances in next-generation sequencing allow simultaneous testing for multiple genes associated with hereditary cancers.

Multi-gene panel testing

Multi-gene panel testing encompasses tests for a wide range of mutations, including:

  • Mutations in homologous recombination (HR) (BRCA1/2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D)
  • Mismatch repair genets (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM)
  • Breast cancer susceptibility genes (CDH1, PTEN, STK11, TP53)
  • Other cancer susceptibility genes

This is a highly cost-effective and time-effective method for the simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes. It has allowed for the identification of 40 to 50 percent more individuals with hereditary cancer gene mutations than is possible testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 alone. However, these tests have some noteworthy limitations.

  • Multi-gene panel testing is more likely to detect rare variants of unknown significance or novel variants with unknown pathological or clinical significance.
  • There are limited data on the degree of cancer risk associated with each gene identified or the age-adjusted risks attributable to the genes.
  • There are no guidelines on the management of many deleterious mutations identified.
  • It is unclear if these individuals would benefit from risk-reduction strategies.

Advertisement

Multi-gene panel testing for gynecologic cancers

Women with BRCA1 mutations have a 65 to 85 percent risk for breast cancer and a 39 to 46 percent risk for ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers by age 70.

Similarly, women with BRCA2 mutations have a 45 to 85 percent risk of breast cancer and a 10 to 27 percent risk of ovarian cancer by age 70.

Mutations in other genes, including BRIP1, RAD51D and RAD51C, have been described to be associated with a 10 to 15 percent lifetime risk of ovarian cancer.

Approximately 20 to 25 percent of ovarian carcinomas are thought to result from a hereditary predisposition. While BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for the vast majority of hereditary ovarian cancers, several other genes within the HR pathway have been shown to contribute to a similar phenotype. Patients with these phenotypes have a better prognosis and clinical response to platinum therapies. In addition, they are likely to benefit from targeted therapies (PARP inhibitors) that exploit defects in the HR pathway.

Current guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists recommend genetic counseling and testing for all women with ovarian cancer, regardless of age or family history.

In addition, patients with a history consistent with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer should be given the option of pursuing panel testing when other cancer types are present in the family, rare syndromes are being considered or the results would influence medical management.

Advertisement

Related Articles

scan showing cholangiocarcinoma
June 5, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Exploring Novel Therapeutic Avenues in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: Lessons from the EA2187 Trial

Collaborative research effort underscores the urgent need for effective second-line therapies in this rare, aggressive cancer

Anticoagulant sign
June 4, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Safe for Patients with Brain Metastasis

Largest study to date comparing direct-acting oral anticoagulants to low-molecular-weight heparin

Squamous cell carcinoma
June 2, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Adjuvant Immunotherapy in High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Pembrolizumab does not improve outcomes, but immunotherapy may still offer benefit

Photonic sensor
May 22, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Novel Partnership Aims to Advance ctDNA Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cleveland Clinic, the University of Minnesota and University of Cambridge receive $1M grant to develop point-of-care biosensor for early detection and treatment personalization

gastroesophageal cancer illustration
May 20, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Roughly One-Third of Patients with Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer May be Eligible for New Targeted Therapy

Long-acting antiemetics and high-dose steroids key to minimizing acute nausea

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy
May 16, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Changing Course in Treating Advanced Melanoma

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes

Dr. Abhay Singh
May 14, 2025/Cancer
Managing Weight and Diabetes May Offer Promise for Blood Cancer Prevention (Podcast)

Use of GLP-1s and improving cardiovascular health lowers risk of hematologic malignancies

Ad