March 18, 2019/Cancer

Identifying Lung Cancer Risk Factors in Lung Transplant Recipients

Registry linkage study reports on incidence, risk factors and survival

Valapour_LT_lung_cancer

By Maryam Valapour, MD, MPP

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

With the increasing use of lung transplantation for patients with end-stage lung disease comes an increase in the long-term complications of transplant, including the risk of lung cancer. My colleagues and I, including first author Matthew Triplette, MD, MPH, recently conducted a registry linkage study to explore this poorly understood increase in risk and published our results in the American Journal of Transplantation.

We used data from the Transplant Cancer Match (TCM) study, which links U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) with 17 state and regional cancer registries, to quantify lung cancer risk, histology, stage, treatment and survival in lung transplant recipients compared with the general population as well as to identify risk factors for its development.

Our cohort of 8993 patients was comprised of 53 percent male recipients, and the median age at time of transplant was 54 years. Forty-five percent had undergone single lung transplantation and the remainder a double lung procedure. The top three indications for transplantation were COPD (34 percent), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (25 percent) and cystic fibrosis (16 percent). Of the 77 percent of recipients with available smoking data, 64 percent had a pretransplant history of smoking.

Cancer incidence

We found that recipients of a single lung transplantation had a 13-fold increased risk of lung cancer (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 13; 95% CI, 11-15) in the native lung compared with similar persons in the general population who did not have a transplant. Risk of lung cancer was about five times higher for all lung transplant recipients compared with the general population (SIR 4.8; 95% CI, 41.-5.5). The below table summarizes our results.

Republished with permission from the American Journal of Transplantation.

Advertisement

Risk factors

The following factors were significantly associated with increased risk for lung cancer in recipients of a single lung transplant: history of cigarette smoking pretransplant, older age at transplant, lower education level and longer time since transplant. A vast majority of native lung cancers (90 percent) occurred in recipients with COPD or IPF, but only IPF was associated with a significantly higher risk (adjusted IRR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.6).

Staging and survival

Compared with lung cancer patients in the general population, transplant recipients with lung cancer were younger (P < 0.001), more likely to have localized disease (28 versus 20 percent, P = 0.04), and more likely to be treated with surgery (37 vs 26 percent, P = 0.05). Despite presenting at earlier stages, survival was shorter for transplant recipients than for other patients (median 153 versus 245 days, P < 0.001). All-cause and cancer-specific mortality was higher for transplant recipients.

Implications for screening and practice

Our findings suggest that pre-existing damage in the native lung contributes significantly to the increased risk of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients. Our results also may indicate that transplant-related factors (e.g., immunosuppression) contribute to carcinogenesis, as our analysis showed that native lung cancer risk increased with time from transplant and that risk increased for transplanted lungs as well. We also observed a difference in tumor histology, with a disproportionate increase in squamous cell cancer following transplantation, suggesting that distinct oncogenic mechanisms may be involved.

The increase in mortality despite the earlier stage at presentation and greater use of surgical intervention may reflect a more aggressive cancer biology with loss of immune control of cancer progression. Transplant-related comorbidities such as chronic allograft dysfunction and infection likely also contribute to the excess mortality. Regardless of etiology, lung transplant recipients face a 6.5-fold increase in mortality when diagnosed with lung cancer.

These findings have a few important implications. First, a patient’s individual risk of developing lung cancer in a native lung may need to be included among the many other factors that are considered in the decision to perform a bilateral versus single lung transplant. Second, consideration should be given to more rigorous post-transplant lung cancer surveillance particularly among those receiving a single lung transplant, though it is unclear whether this strategy will improve survival of those diagnosed with cancer.

Advertisement

Dr. Valapour is Director of Lung Transplant Outcomes for the Respiratory Institute and Senior Staff for Lung Transplantation for the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

Feature image: H460 non-small cell lung cancer cells were exposed to the antitumor drug cisplatin after autophagy inhibition. The image shows the H460 cells (in green) showing changed staining intensity after inhibition of autophagy. The small bright green bodies are likely to be micronuclei. Autophagy represents a response to chemotherapy and radiation that may be one component of resistance to therapy. Source: NCI Visuals Online. Creator: David A. Gewirtz, Tareq Saleh

Related Articles

Director of the Novel Cancer Therapeutics Center
May 2, 2024/Cancer/Innovations
Oncology Pharmacovigilance Clinic Expands Specialties

First-of-its-kind clinic for immune-related adverse events supports oncologists in managing severe side effects

Scrambler therapy for nerve pain
April 29, 2024/Cancer
Scrambler Technology Life Changing for Many Patients with Neuropathic Pain

Novel therapy “retrains” the brain to disrupt pain signals

Women's health physician
April 16, 2024/Cancer
Watching Out for Primary Ovarian Insufficiency

An underdiagnosed condition in patients with cancer

Fluorescent imaging during small bowel surgery
April 11, 2024/Cancer/Surgical Oncology
Fluorescence Imaging Augments Surgical Inspection and Palpation for Small Bowel Carcinoid Tumors

Study demonstrates superior visualization of occult primary lesions

microwave ablation of liver tumor
150-Watt, Single-Antenna Microwave Ablation System Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy

New device offers greater tumor control for malignant liver lesions

viral-induced cancer
April 3, 2024/Cancer
Mechanism of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) May Serve as Clue to More Effective Treatment

Cleveland Clinic researchers discover what drives – and what may halt – virus-induced cancer

Dr. Mukherjee at Cleveland Clinic
April 1, 2024/Cancer/Blood Cancers
Many Patients with “Indolent” Systemic Mastocytosis Experience Rapid Decline and Lower Survival

First-ever U.S. population-level retrospective analysis reveals many patients with systemic mastocytosis need faster intervention

Cleveland Clinic physiatrist
March 22, 2024/Cancer/Innovations
The Vital Role of Oncology Rehabilitation (Podcast)

New program provides prehabilitation and rehabilitation services to help patients with cancer maintain and regain function

Ad