Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 5, 2021/Cancer

Less Radiation Needed to Control Small Choroidal Melanoma

Apical-height dosing produces outcomes comparable to 5-mm dosing

21-EYE-2317711-CQD-Melanoma Brachytherapy_Arun Singh_fig1 hero

Small choroidal melanoma needs less radiation to control than once thought. Conventional practice has been to apply radiation therapy to a minimum height of 5 mm, even for tumors smaller than 5 mm, as recommended by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). However, new research has found that applying treatment only to the actual height of the tumor, no matter how small — as recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) — is just as effective.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“COMS recommended treating up to 5 mm to prevent undertreatment of these small tumors,” says Arun D. Singh, MD, Director of Ophthalmic Oncology at Cleveland Clinic’s Cole Eye Institute. “But there’s also a risk of overtreatment, especially considering that many of these tumors are too small to biopsy and may not be melanoma at all.”

The more radiation, the higher likelihood of vision loss and other adverse effects. A lower dose may prevent those effects. Now, according to the study recently published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology and coauthored by Dr. Singh, findings show that a lower (apical) dose also offers patients the same excellent outcomes in visual acuity, recurrence, eye survival and metastasis as the higher (5 mm) dose.

Local control rate: 99.3%

Researchers reviewed the charts of 161 consecutive patients with small choroidal melanoma (apical height 1.0-2.5 mm, largest basal diameter < 16.0 mm) treated at Cole Eye Institute from 2004 to 2017. All patients were treated with 85 Gy of iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy dosed to the apical height of the tumor.

At a mean follow-up of 40 months:

  • More than two in three patients (69%) had a visual acuity of 20/50 or better.
  • Only one patient had a local recurrence.
  • Only one patient had an enucleation.
  • No patients had metastases.

“Outcomes of this low dosing were very, very good, with a local control rate of 99.3%,” says Dr. Singh. “Treating these very small tumors to 5 mm may be unnecessary.”

Preserved visual acuity

Validation of apical-dose ABS guidelines for small and medium choroidal melanoma was recently published in Brachytherapy.

Advertisement

In that study, the actual apical-height radiation dosing in more than 300 patients was compared with simulated 5-mm dosing. Mathematical models indicated that patients had received 34% less radiation to their lens, 40% less radiation to their optic disc and 41% less radiation to their fovea than if they had received 5-mm dosing.

Visual acuity of 20/50 or better after three years was found in 56% of these patients. According to estimates, that number would have been only 31% had patients had 5-mm dosing.

What patients most want to know

With proper treatment, patients diagnosed with small melanoma can expect good local control (Figures 1 and 2) and a negligible risk of mortality. The British Journal of Ophthalmology study indicated overall survival of 97% and metastatic-free survival of 100% at three years.

Figure 1. A 60-year-old male presented with a choroidal melanoma (12 mm x 9 mm x 3 mm) close to the optic disc and fovea in the left eye.

Figure 2. Ten years following episcleral brachytherapy (prescribed per ABS guidelines), the tumor was regressed with preserved visual acuity (20/20) and absence of metastasis.

“This was the first study to evaluate all four key clinical outcomes, things that patients with choroidal melanoma most want to know: Will the treatment stop the cancer from coming back? Will I keep my eye? Will I preserve my vision? Will I save my life?” says Dr. Singh. “We now can feel confident about answering yes to all those things.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Acupuncture in wrist
May 29, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Can Acupuncture Really Help with Cancer Treatment Side Effects?

Evidence-based recommendations for managing pain, nausea and other treatment reactions

Head and neck cancer illustration
May 28, 2026/Cancer

What Is the Outlook for Treatment De-Intensification Strategies for Head & Neck Cancer?

Emerging data and practice changes reduce toxicity burden of treatment

Ad