Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 5, 2021/Cancer

Less Radiation Needed to Control Small Choroidal Melanoma

Apical-height dosing produces outcomes comparable to 5-mm dosing

21-EYE-2317711-CQD-Melanoma Brachytherapy_Arun Singh_fig1 hero

Small choroidal melanoma needs less radiation to control than once thought. Conventional practice has been to apply radiation therapy to a minimum height of 5 mm, even for tumors smaller than 5 mm, as recommended by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). However, new research has found that applying treatment only to the actual height of the tumor, no matter how small — as recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) — is just as effective.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“COMS recommended treating up to 5 mm to prevent undertreatment of these small tumors,” says Arun D. Singh, MD, Director of Ophthalmic Oncology at Cleveland Clinic’s Cole Eye Institute. “But there’s also a risk of overtreatment, especially considering that many of these tumors are too small to biopsy and may not be melanoma at all.”

The more radiation, the higher likelihood of vision loss and other adverse effects. A lower dose may prevent those effects. Now, according to the study recently published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology and coauthored by Dr. Singh, findings show that a lower (apical) dose also offers patients the same excellent outcomes in visual acuity, recurrence, eye survival and metastasis as the higher (5 mm) dose.

Local control rate: 99.3%

Researchers reviewed the charts of 161 consecutive patients with small choroidal melanoma (apical height 1.0-2.5 mm, largest basal diameter < 16.0 mm) treated at Cole Eye Institute from 2004 to 2017. All patients were treated with 85 Gy of iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy dosed to the apical height of the tumor.

At a mean follow-up of 40 months:

  • More than two in three patients (69%) had a visual acuity of 20/50 or better.
  • Only one patient had a local recurrence.
  • Only one patient had an enucleation.
  • No patients had metastases.

“Outcomes of this low dosing were very, very good, with a local control rate of 99.3%,” says Dr. Singh. “Treating these very small tumors to 5 mm may be unnecessary.”

Preserved visual acuity

Validation of apical-dose ABS guidelines for small and medium choroidal melanoma was recently published in Brachytherapy.

Advertisement

In that study, the actual apical-height radiation dosing in more than 300 patients was compared with simulated 5-mm dosing. Mathematical models indicated that patients had received 34% less radiation to their lens, 40% less radiation to their optic disc and 41% less radiation to their fovea than if they had received 5-mm dosing.

Visual acuity of 20/50 or better after three years was found in 56% of these patients. According to estimates, that number would have been only 31% had patients had 5-mm dosing.

What patients most want to know

With proper treatment, patients diagnosed with small melanoma can expect good local control (Figures 1 and 2) and a negligible risk of mortality. The British Journal of Ophthalmology study indicated overall survival of 97% and metastatic-free survival of 100% at three years.

Figure 1. A 60-year-old male presented with a choroidal melanoma (12 mm x 9 mm x 3 mm) close to the optic disc and fovea in the left eye.

Figure 2. Ten years following episcleral brachytherapy (prescribed per ABS guidelines), the tumor was regressed with preserved visual acuity (20/20) and absence of metastasis.

“This was the first study to evaluate all four key clinical outcomes, things that patients with choroidal melanoma most want to know: Will the treatment stop the cancer from coming back? Will I keep my eye? Will I preserve my vision? Will I save my life?” says Dr. Singh. “We now can feel confident about answering yes to all those things.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

CAR T cell
March 28, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
What’s New and on the Horizon for Treating Multiple Myeloma?

Making sense of the fast-moving treatment landscape

Myelofibrosis cells
March 18, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Personalizing Treatment of Myelofibrosis-Associated Anemia

Combination therapy may help address underlying disease

Basal cell carcinoma
March 14, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Definitive Radiation Therapy Effective for Treating Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Major study demonstrates importance of having a multidisciplinary approach to treatment for large, locally advanced tumors

PET scan
March 4, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Case Study: First Patient at Cleveland Clinic Treated with Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy

Highly personalized treatment shrinks tumors resistant to immunotherapy

cells with idiopathic multicentric Castleman Disease
February 20, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Study Offers New Insights into Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease

Highlighting treatment gaps and challenges in the management of rare condition

CAR T-cell therapy
February 18, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Top Myths About CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Explaining common misconceptions about chimeric antigen receptor therapy

Silhouettes of man and woman
February 7, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Pharmacokinetics of Many Anticancer Drugs Differ Among Sexes

Slower drug elimination from the body among females may impact safety and efficacy

Ad