Locations:
Search IconSearch
April 12, 2019/Cancer/Tumor Oncology

Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cancer Patients Have Positive Response to Immunotherapy

Analysis provides evidence to guide treatment of uncommon RCC subtypes

chronic kidney disease

Over the past decade, major progress has been made in treating metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), with immunotherapy now a standard of care in ccRCC. However, progress has lagged behind for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC), which affects only a fraction of all RCC patients, and is not well understood.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Treatment for metastatic nccRCC has been based mainly on extrapolation of data from metastatic ccRCC treatment with limited prospective data to guide its use. The data that is available has shown that nccRCC is often resistant to systemic treatments used for ccRCC. In studies evaluating the previous standard of care — vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors — for advanced nccRCC, sunitinib and everolimus showed modest clinical activity with lower response rates than ccRCC.

In 2018, the immunotherapy regimen ipilimumab/nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) was approved as a firstline treatment for IMDC intermediate and poor risk metastatic ccRCC patients but was not tested in nccRCC patients. Nivolumab monotherapy, however, has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for nccRCC in a multicenter retrospective analysis of 41 patients, which included patients from Cleveland Clinic.

To learn about the clinical activity of Ipi/Nivo in metastatic nccRCC patients, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center conducted a retrospective analysis, which was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium earlier this year. “Since Ipi/Nivo was approved last year for clear cell RCC, many clinicians are using it for non-clear cell RCC patients as well. Our aim was to better characterize our experience with this regimen and provide information about clinical activity,” says Moshe Ornstein, MD, a medical oncologist at Cleveland Clinic.

Advertisement

Patient characteristics

The 18 patients included in the study cohort had non-clear cell histologies including: papillary (6), adenocarcinoma of renal origin not otherwise specified (2), unclassified (3), chromophobe (5), translocation (1) and medullary (1). Seven patients had ECOG PS 0, nine ECOG PS 1 and 2 ECOG PS 2. The median age was 60; 14 patients were male, and four female.

Treatment administration

Ipi/Nivo was administered according to the protocols of CHECKMATE 214, the metastatic ccRCC trial that led to the treatment’s approval. Most patients received Ipi/Nivo as firstline treatment and the remaining received it following other systemic therapy. Patients had computed tomography scans at baseline and every 12 weeks to assess disease response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Positive results

Of the 18 patients, four patients showed a partial response (PR), and four had stable disease. In total, this represents a 42% disease control rate. Eleven patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which included: colitis (4), hepatotoxicity (3), hypophysitis (1), fatigue (1), rash (1) and encephalitis (1). All were resolved except the encephalitis, which caused the patient’s death. Four other patients died from the disease.

“Overall, this retrospective analysis demonstrated promising results and expected toxicity for ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with for non-clear cell RCC,” says Dr. Ornstein.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Male patient with doctor
June 17, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Overcoming Taboos: Helping Men with Cancer Restore Sexual Health

Creating a safe space for patients

Masked patient with physician
June 15, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Managing Infection Risk in the Era of Cell Therapy

Long-term immune effects reshape preventative strategies and timelines

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Ad