Advertisement
Two smaller sequential doses may be better than one
A novel two-stage approach to Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery is showing improved outcomes for treating large brain metastases, and Cleveland Clinic has become the first center outside Japan to embrace it. By allowing for delivery of an overall higher dose of radiation with minimal toxicity, the strategy represents a potential new standard of care for large brain metastases.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Brain metastases arise in some 20 to 40 percent of patients diagnosed with systemic cancer, and that proportion is likely to rise with earlier detection and personalized targeted therapies that lengthen survival for increasing numbers of oncology patients.
Meanwhile, in recent years Gamma Knife radiosurgery has gained favor as monotherapy for brain metastases. It is minimally invasive, is performed on an outpatient basis, results in little or no disruption of systemic treatment for the patient’s primary cancer, and is often highly effective in controlling brain tumors while avoiding the toxicity of whole-brain radiation therapy.
However, standard Gamma Knife radiosurgery has been less successful for brain metastases larger than 2 cm, with local control rates of just 37 to 62 percent reported in the literature.
“The question is how to get a large dose to a large tumor so patients don’t fail therapy,” explains Cleveland Clinic neurosurgeon Lilyana Angelov, MD. “These cases are exceptionally daunting to take on because the outcomes are quite poor compared with smaller tumors.”
In recent years, Dr. Angelov and colleagues in Cleveland Clinic’s Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center have become the first team outside Japan to use a novel approach that could dramatically improve the odds of a good outcome.
Instead of a single radiation dose limited by the toxicity resulting from treating these large tumors, Gamma Knife therapy for large tumors is now delivered in medium-high doses over two stages about a month apart.
Advertisement
“This allows us, in most cases, to spare the patient the risks of open surgery and the toxicity of whole-brain radiation therapy,” Dr. Angelov explains. “It’s a game changer.”
Indeed, among Cleveland Clinic’s first 54 patients — with a total of 63 brain metastases 2 cm or larger — the local control rate at six months has been 88 percent. That compares with a prior local control rate of 49 percent for similar-sized brain metastases treated with single-stage Gamma Knife therapy at Cleveland Clinic.
The median time between treatments in these 54 patients was approximately one month. In many cases, the tumor decreased in size markedly enough so that the second stage of treatment was able to deliver a lower radiation dose to regions adjacent to the tumor, thus better protecting the surrounding normal brain tissue.
There were only seven instances of adverse radiation effects, such as headaches and seizures, in these initial 54 patients. Radiation effects that did occur were mostly mild and transient. “Because we’re dividing the dose, the treatment is better tolerated,” Dr. Angelov notes.
Since that analysis, which has been submitted for journal publication, her team has used the staged approach for about 150 additional cases, with continued positive outcomes.
MRIs from a patient who underwent staged Gamma Knife therapy. Top images are before the first session (left) and immediately before the second session (right). Bottom images are from six months (left) and four years (right) after the second session, where significant reduction in the size of the metastases can be seen.
Advertisement
Not every patient with a large brain metastasis is eligible. For example, those whose tumor is causing neurological dysfunction, such as cognitive problems or paralysis, need immediate surgery.
Moreover, patients who don’t live nearby may find it difficult to come back for two treatments, though Dr. Angelov says most patients are comfortable doing so.
“I tell patients this is essentially a boost,” she continues. “You kick the tumor when it’s down by giving another dose. It’s not a difficult concept for patients.”
Dr. Angelov expects that, once published, her team’s first report will be “the reference paper on this topic” but that a prospective multicenter study will be needed to make the findings definitive.
Ultimately, she expects the approach to become the standard of care across the country for large brain metastases: “I see it as a primary modality for treating these patients in a minimally invasive manner. I think many patients will be well-served.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Prediction and bioinformatic data could prove valuable for therapeutic interventions targeting this malignancy
Study measures real-world outcomes for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma
Optimized responses in transplant- and CAR T-cell therapy-eligible patients
Phase 3 trial found no survival differences between weekly or biweekly doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or between weekly or biweekly paclitaxel
Findings strengthen evidence for risk-reducing procedures
Findings from large database important to inform clinical practice
Socioeconomic disparities have a notable influence on access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant
Offers a new option for patients 60 and older with relapsed/refractory disease