Advertisement
Gradual titration and extended release formulation should reduce adverse effects
By Vinni Makin, MBBS, MD, FACE, and M. Cecilia Lansang, MD, MPH
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Metformin improves glycemic control without tending to cause weight gain or hypoglycemia. It may also have cardiovascular benefits. Metformin is an inexpensive agent that should be continued, if tolerated, in those who need additional agents for glycemic control. It should be considered in all adult patients with type 2 diabetes, with possible exceptions noted below.
Because metformin is renally cleared, it has caused some concern about nephrotoxicity, especially lactic acidosis, in patients with impaired renal function. But the most recent guidelines have relaxed the criteria for metformin use in this patient population.
Metformin’s labeling,1 revised in 2016, states the following:
These labeling revisions were based on a systematic review by Inzucchi, et al.2 that found metformin is not associated with increased rates of lactic acidosis in patients with mild to moderate kidney disease. Subsequently, an observational study published in 2018 by Lazarus, et al. 3 showed that metformin increases the risk of acidosis only at eGFR levels below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Also, a Cochrane review published in 2003 did not find a single case of lactic acidosis in 347 trials with 70,490 patient-years of metformin treatment.4
Advertisement
Previous guidelines used serum creatinine levels, with metformin contraindicated at levels of 1.5 mg/dL or above for men and 1.4 mg/dL for women, or with abnormal creatinine clearance. The ADA and the AACE now use the eGFR5, instead of the serum creatinine level to measure kidney function because it better accounts for factors such as the patient’s age, sex, race and weight.
Despite the evidence, the common patient perception is that metformin is nephrotoxic, and it is important for practitioners to dispel this myth during clinic visits.
Metformin’s gastrointestinal adverse effects such as diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting are a barrier to its use. The actual incidence rate of diarrhea varies widely in randomized trials and observational studies, and gastrointestinal effects are worse in metformin-naive patients, as well as those who have chronic gastritis or Helicobacter pylori infection.7
We have found that starting metformin at a low dose and up-titrating it over several weeks increases tolerability. We often start patients at 500 mg/day and increase the dosage by one 500-mg tablet every one to two weeks. Also, we have noticed that intolerance is more likely in patients who eat a high-carbohydrate diet, but there is no high-level evidence to back this up because patients in clinical trials all undergo nutrition counseling and are therefore more likely to adhere to the low-carbohydrate diet.
Also, the extended-release formulation is more tolerable than the immediate-release formulation and has similar glycemic efficacy. It may be an option as first-line therapy or for patients who have significant adverse effects from immediate-release metformin.8 For patients on the immediate-release formulation, taking it with meals helps lessen some gastrointestinal effects, and this should be emphasized at every visit.
Advertisement
Finally, we limit the metformin dose to 2,000 mg/day, rather than the 2,550 mg/day allowed on labeling. Garber et al9 found that the lower dosage still provides the maximum clinical efficacy.
Metformin should be avoided in patients with acute or unstable heart failure because of the increased risk of lactic acidosis.
It also should be avoided in patients with hepatic impairment, according to the labeling. But this remains controversial in practice. Zhang et al10 showed that continuing metformin in patients with diabetes and cirrhosis decreases the mortality risk by 57% compared with those taken off metformin.
Diet and lifestyle measures need to be emphasized at each visit. Wing et al11 showed that calorie restriction regardless of weight loss is beneficial for glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in obese patients with diabetes.
Advertisement
Note: This is an abridged version of an article originally published in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Falling from standing height should not break bones
Comprehensive approach can make a transformative impact
Screening and medication key to better outcomes
While the skeletal effects of nutrient deficiency are well-known, it’s important to consider how deficiency impacts the endocrine system
The tool can provide better clarity on evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules, reduce the number of unnecessary surgeries and help providers tailor patient care
Guidance for counseling patients on the use of one of the most common daily supplements taken in the US
Two case studies illustrate why it’s important to look at DXA data holistically when treating patients with fracture risk
Because treatment options are reserved for classic Cushing’s, monitoring changes is critical in the management of subclinical Cushing’s