Locations:
Search IconSearch

Study Highlights Red Flags for Referral to ENT for Ear Foreign Body Retrieval

Prompt referral of difficult cases can ensure removal of objects without complications

18-ENT-934-Mingo_Woodson-Hero-Image-650x450pxl

Early consultation is best in cases of pediatric foreign body presentations in young children with non-graspable objects in their ear canals, according to research presented by Katie M. Mingo, MD, a resident in the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Institute at Cleveland Clinic. She presented at the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Annual Meeting (a section of the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM)) held in Maryland in April.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Pediatric ear foreign body presentation is common, and most cases present to the Emergency Department (ED) or primary care practices for removal of the object first,” explains Dr. Mingo. “Although many of these patients are treated without difficulty, there is a possibility for major complications, so I wanted to compare the success rates in primary care and ED settings to those in otolaryngology.” She also analyzed the characteristics of patients or ear foreign bodies that should prompt early referral to an Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) specialist.

Dr. Mingo performed a retrospective chart review looking for ICD codes to identify pediatric patients who presented to Cleveland Clinic in the year 2016 for ear foreign body removal. She found 275 patients, 133 (48.4 percent) who presented to the ED, 60 (21.8 percent) who presented to a pediatrician, 44 (16 percent) who presented to an ENT and 38 (13.8 percent) who presented to an ENT after previous attempts by other physicians at foreign body removal.

The overall rate of successful removal was high in the study, with 75 percent of pediatricians removing the objects on a first attempt compared to 88 percent of ED physicians and 100 percent of ENTs. Minor complications such as scratches of the ear canal wall were more common with retrieval by an ENT after prior failed attempts by other clinicians, occurring in 26.3 percent of cases versus 2.3 to 6.0 percent. ENTs observed two cases of tympanic membrane perforations after previous failed attempts by other physicians; both of these cases occurred in patients who presented with non-graspable foreign bodies in their ears. (Another possible major complication of ear foreign body removal is ossicular damage, which could lead to permanent hearing loss, she says.)

Advertisement

Dr. Mingo also found that the rate of operative intervention was higher in patients who presented to an ENT after another physician’s failed attempt at removal versus patients who presented to an ENT first (34.2 percent versus 4.6 percent). “There were seven patients who presented to an ENT after previous attempts at removal that were both age five or younger and had non-graspable foreign bodies in their ears,” she reports, “six (85.7 percent) of which required operative intervention for successful removal.”

Key Clinical Takeaways

Although many patients were successfully treated by pediatricians and in the ED, early consultation with an ENT should be considered in certain cases, according to Dr. Mingo. The factors that characterize success versus failure are when clinicians are dealing with:

  • Children under the age of five,
  • Kids who have comorbid behavioral disorders such as attention-deficit activity disorder (ADHD) or autism that make it difficult to get them to sit still, and
  • When difficult-to-grasp objects such as marbles, beads or stones are involved.

“If two or more of these factors are present, ED and primary care physicians should consider referral to an ENT before trying to remove the object themselves because of the high rate of potential failure, complications and need for operative interventions,” she reports. “If you fail to remove the object once with kids, they often will not cooperate because they know the intervention can be uncomfortable. The ear canal is a very sensitive area that can easily become inflamed by a foreign body and by attempts by the child or parent to remove it before coming to see a clinician.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Ku with patient
New ASCO Guideline Highlights Role of TORS in Managing Oropharyngeal Cancer

Evidence-based recommendations for balancing cancer control with quality of life

cochlear implant
Expanding Cochlear Implant Candidacy: Cleveland Clinic Study Supports Off-Label Success

Study shows no negative impact for individuals with better contralateral ear performance

Diagram of Inspire Device
Transforming Sleep for Pediatric Patients with Trisomy 21

HNS device offers new solution for those struggling with CPAP

Vestibular Schwannoma pre- and post-operative CT scans
Successful Multidisciplinary Approach to Complex Neuroma Surgery

Patient with cerebral palsy undergoes life-saving tumor resection

Person coughing into arm
Exploring Longitudinal Trends and Patterns in Chronic Cough (Podcast)

Specialists are increasingly relying on otolaryngologists for evaluation and treatment of the complex condition

Dr. Doyle examining patient's ear
Case Study: Innovative Ear Reconstructions Address Cholesteatoma Pain

Detailed surgical process uncovers extensive middle ear damage causing severe pain and pressure.

Physicians performing rhinoplasty on patient
Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery Insights and Innovations (Podcast)

Despite advancements in the specialty, patient-centered care needs to remain a priority

Ad