Locations:
Search IconSearch
September 17, 2021/Cancer

Techniques and Lessons Learned: What to Know About Single-Port Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy

Early experiences and outcomes on the brink of 200 cases

Single-port robot

Cleveland Clinic was the first U.S. medical center to begin using the single-port (SP) robot for urologic procedures in late 2018. Since then, experts at Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute continue to fine-tune their surgical technique.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Jihad Kaouk, MD, Director of the Center for Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery and the Zegarac-Pollock Endowed Chair in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, elaborates on the benefits of performing the prostate cancer surgery extraperitoneally, noting, “By avoiding the sac in which the bowel is contained, the surgery is compartmentalized, limited to the area just around the prostate. The gas bubble in which the robotic arms work expands the peritoneum, pushing the bowel out of the way, allowing better visibility.”

In addition, the SP robotic technique avoids the steep Trendelenburg positioning, which improves recovery time and mitigates potential risks associated with such positioning, including optical nerve edema, congestion and respiratory problems during surgery. Patients undergoing the procedure with SP robotic prostatectomy lie flat. They experience a single incision, versus the five incisions required in a patient’s abdomen in previous robotic radical prostatectomy procedures.

These key differences in the SP robotic technique allow for easier extraperitoneal access, which helps avoid intra-abdominal adhesions. The technique also avoids assistant ports. Improved recovery aspects of the SP robotic procedure include decreased opioid use (70 percent of patients do not use opioids), an increase in same-day discharges with a median hospital stay of 4.8 hours, no drains and no reported ileus, with good functional and oncologic outcomes. Nearly 90 percent of patients were continent at six months.

Advertisement

The team shared their experience using the SP robot to perform extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in 185 cases at the American Urological Association 2021 Annual Meeting.

Learn more in their virtual presentation:

SP Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Lessons on the Brink of 200 Cases (Graphic)

Advertisement

Related Articles

Surgeon
June 30, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Potential for Deintensification of Surgical Interventions in Low-Risk Breast Cancer

Reconsidering axillary lymph node dissection as well as depth of surgical margins

Dendritic cell
June 26, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Avelumab Induces Natural Killer Cell Activation and Dendritic Cell Crosstalk

Researchers uncover profound differences in the mechanism of action between different PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors

World map
June 19, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Breaking Barriers to Cancer Care: Cleveland Clinic’s Global Approach

A multi-pronged strategy for tackling cancer access problems

CAR T-cell therapy illustration
June 12, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
First-Ever U.S. Trial of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory AL Amyloidosis

Early results show patients experiencing deep and complete response

Genomic profiling
June 10, 2025/Cancer
Cleveland Clinic’s Hemato-Oncology Team Spearheads the Development of Guidelines for Genomic Profiling of MDS to Inform Allo-HCT

Inclusion of genomic profiling and risk factors recommended for treatment planning

scan showing cholangiocarcinoma
June 5, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Exploring Novel Therapeutic Avenues in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: Lessons from the EA2187 Trial

Collaborative research effort underscores the urgent need for effective second-line therapies in this rare, aggressive cancer

Anticoagulant sign
June 4, 2025/Cancer/News & Insight
Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Safe for Patients with Brain Metastasis

Largest study to date comparing direct-acting oral anticoagulants to low-molecular-weight heparin

Ad