April 12, 2018/Cancer/Research

Thyroid Cancer Treatment with Radioactive Iodine Increases Risk of Leukemia

Study shows risk of overtreating patients

thyroid-cancer-650×450

Previous studies have shown that patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) who are treated with resection followed by radioactive iodine (RAI) have a small but significant risk of developing leukemia.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Now a new study by Cleveland Clinic researchers shows that such patients have an early and significantly increased risk of developing two types of leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The study also shows that patients who develop AML as a second cancer have worse survival.

“Several studies in the past have looked at the risk of developing leukemia in well-differentiated thyroid cancer patients who receive surgery followed by radioactive iodine, but they grouped together all different kinds of leukemias under one broad category,” says Sudipto Mukherjee, MD, MPH, associate staff in the Department of Hematology and Oncology and senior author on the study, published recently in the Journal of Oncology.

“Analyzing all leukemia subtypes under one category may not reflect true risk,” he says, “because not all leukemia subtypes behave the same way, are treated the same way or have the same prognosis.”

Small but significant risk

Dr. Mukherjee and his colleagues did a retrospective analysis of patient data from 1973 to 2016, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registries of the National Cancer Institute, to identify the risk of development of several types of hematologic malignancies in WDTC patients treated with RAI.

The investigators analyzed 148,215 patients diagnosed with WDTC of which 53 percent received surgery alone and 47 percent received surgery followed by RAI. After a median interval of 6.5 years, 783 patients developed hematologic malignancies — 417 after surgery alone and 366 after surgery plus RAI.

Advertisement

The researchers then analyzed the risk of developing seven types of hematologic malignancies. In addition to AML and CML, they also looked at acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non- Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The elevation in risk following RAI exposure was significant only for AML and CML.

Survival lower for patients with AML

Dr. Mukherjee and his co-authors also found that the patients who developed AML and CML did so quickly — within one or two years of receiving surgery and RAI. RAI was associated with decreased leukemia-free survival for AML and CML in these patients.

Additionally, the investigators found that the patients with WDTC who developed AML after surgery and RAI did not survive as long compared with patients with WDTC who did not develop AML (median of eight vs 31 years).

“If you develop AML as a first cancer versus as a second cancer after having well-differentiated thyroid cancer treated with surgery and radioactive iodine, survival is adversely affected,” says Dr. Mukherjee. “AML occurring after RAI behaves biologically as a more aggressive cancer.”

Overtreating with radioactive iodine

The researchers’ data show that the use of RAI has gone up significantly in the U.S. in the past four decades from about 5 percent in 1973 to 50 percent in 2016. “That’s a staggering increase,” Dr. Mukherjee says.

Advertisement

The incidence of WDTC also increased significantly during that period, but Dr. Mukherjee says that increase is due mainly to increased ultrasound detection of low-risk tumors.

“There is a concern of overdiagnosis of WDTC tumors and potential overtreatment with RAI, and recommendations against routine use of RAI in WDTC patients with low-risk disease and some intermediate-risk disease,” says Dr. Mukherjee.

“What our data suggest is that giving radioactive iodine is not without any risk. There is a risk of leukemia, even though the risk is small, and it may be potentially avoidable.”

Related Articles

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024/Cancer/Research
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024/Cancer/Research
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024/Cancer/Research
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024/Cancer/Research
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

24-CNR-4545611-CQD-Podcast-967×544
February 1, 2024/Cancer/Research
Possibilities of CRISPR Technology (Podcast)

Gene editing technology offers promise for treating multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies, as well as solid tumors

Disparities in multiple myeloma
January 25, 2024/Cancer/Research
Major Study Identifies Global Disparities in Drug Toxicity for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Study of 401,576 patients reveals differences in cancer burdens as well as overall survival

Dr. Shilpa Gupta
December 27, 2023/Cancer/Research
A New Standard Emerges in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Decades of First-Line Chemotherapy

Enfortumab plus pembrolizumab reduced risk of death by 53% compared with platinum-based chemotherapy

Ad