March 14, 2017/Cancer

Trimodality Therapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer

An alternative to radical cystectomy for eligible patients


By Omar Mian, MD, PhD


Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Over the past several decades, organ preservation relying on combined modality treatment has become the standard of care for a variety of cancers. Trimodality therapy (TMT) relies on varied combinations of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy and has proven advantageous in preserving organ function and quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes.

A large body of evidence supports TMT across the spectrum of oncologic diseases, including breast, head and neck, lung, colorectal, gynecological and urothelial cancers.

While radical cystectomy remains the standard curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, TMT is an underutilized, safe and effective alternative with comparable outcomes to cystectomy for patients who meet certain criteria.

Patient selection is important

Should a patient present with localized, nonmetastatic, muscle-invasive disease, the following factors are associated with favorable outcomes with TMT:

  • T2 to T3a, node-negative disease
  • Good baseline bladder function (worth preserving)
  • Complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)
  • Unifocal tumors smaller than 5cm
  • Urothelial histology and absence of extensive carcinoma in situ
  • Preserved renal function and ability to receive chemotherapy
  • Absence of ureteral involvement or tumor-associated hydronephrosis

TMT regimen

Treatment with TMT for bladder cancer involves maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), followed by radiation with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy. In the U.S., chemotherapy usually involves weekly cisplatin. An alternative regimen often used in Europe is mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil, which may offer reduced impact on kidney function.

In the TMT approach, radiation oncologists typically deliver 40-45 Gy to the entire bladder, prostatic or proximal urethra and the adjacent lymph node basin in the pelvis, followed by a restaging cystoscopy with repeat TURBT and biopsies.



Planning CT scan for concurrent chemoradiation therapy following maximal TURBT in a bladder cancer patient; radiation dose graded by color. The red outline encircles tumor location.

If a patient demonstrates complete response, concurrent chemoradiation continues to a total dose of 64-65 Gy. A minority of patients either fail to respond or progress during chemoradiation. In such patients who display aggressive resistant histology, immediate salvage radical cystectomy is recommended.

The NCI-funded Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has conducted six large multi-institution trials evaluating TMT with variations of radiation dose and chemotherapy. Highlights from these studies include:

  • 71 percent five-year cancer specific survival rate (pooled analyses)
  • 65 percent 10-year cancer specific survival rate (pooled analyses)
  • 87 percent of patients had no local disease recurrence
  • 80 percent of patients retained their bladder at five years and rates of late toxicity were low: 6 percent had significant (grade 3+) late urinary side effects, and 2 percent had significant late gastrointestinal side effects

Quality-of-life and urodynamic studies show 75 percent of patients with normally functioning bladders after TMT, while long-term survivors continue to report favorable qualities of life.

TMT: Discuss with eligible patients

The stepwise approach of TMT—involving TURBT, chemotherapy and radiation, coupled with post-treatment surveillance and response-adapted salvage therapy—offers patients a well-established option to retain their native bladder without compromising quality of life or treatment efficacy.

TMT should therefore be discussed as an alternative to radical cystectomy in all eligible patients, ideally at a multidisciplinary urologic oncology center.

Dr. Mian is on staff in the Department of Radiation Oncology in the Taussig Cancer Institute and Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute.

Related Articles

Fluorescent imaging during small bowel surgery
April 11, 2024/Cancer/Surgical Oncology
Fluorescence Imaging Augments Surgical Inspection and Palpation for Small Bowel Carcinoid Tumors

Study demonstrates superior visualization of occult primary lesions

microwave ablation of liver tumor
150-Watt, Single-Antenna Microwave Ablation System Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy

New device offers greater tumor control for malignant liver lesions

viral-induced cancer
April 3, 2024/Cancer
Mechanism of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) May Serve as Clue to More Effective Treatment

Cleveland Clinic researchers discover what drives – and what may halt – virus-induced cancer

Dr. Mukherjee at Cleveland Clinic
April 1, 2024/Cancer/Blood Cancers
Many Patients with “Indolent” Systemic Mastocytosis Experience Rapid Decline and Lower Survival

First-ever U.S. population-level retrospective analysis reveals many patients with systemic mastocytosis need faster intervention

Cleveland Clinic physiatrist
March 22, 2024/Cancer/Innovations
The Vital Role of Oncology Rehabilitation (Podcast)

New program provides prehabilitation and rehabilitation services to help patients with cancer maintain and regain function

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Hematologist at Cleveland Clinic
March 14, 2024/Cancer/Blood Cancers
Advances in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (Podcast)

Global R&D efforts expanding first-line and relapse therapy options for patients

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024/Cancer/Research
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels