Locations:
Search IconSearch
March 14, 2017/Cancer

Trimodality Therapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer

An alternative to radical cystectomy for eligible patients

650×450

By Omar Mian, MD, PhD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Over the past several decades, organ preservation relying on combined modality treatment has become the standard of care for a variety of cancers. Trimodality therapy (TMT) relies on varied combinations of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy and has proven advantageous in preserving organ function and quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes.

A large body of evidence supports TMT across the spectrum of oncologic diseases, including breast, head and neck, lung, colorectal, gynecological and urothelial cancers.

While radical cystectomy remains the standard curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, TMT is an underutilized, safe and effective alternative with comparable outcomes to cystectomy for patients who meet certain criteria.

Patient selection is important

Should a patient present with localized, nonmetastatic, muscle-invasive disease, the following factors are associated with favorable outcomes with TMT:

  • T2 to T3a, node-negative disease
  • Good baseline bladder function (worth preserving)
  • Complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)
  • Unifocal tumors smaller than 5cm
  • Urothelial histology and absence of extensive carcinoma in situ
  • Preserved renal function and ability to receive chemotherapy
  • Absence of ureteral involvement or tumor-associated hydronephrosis

TMT regimen

Treatment with TMT for bladder cancer involves maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), followed by radiation with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy. In the U.S., chemotherapy usually involves weekly cisplatin. An alternative regimen often used in Europe is mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil, which may offer reduced impact on kidney function.

In the TMT approach, radiation oncologists typically deliver 40-45 Gy to the entire bladder, prostatic or proximal urethra and the adjacent lymph node basin in the pelvis, followed by a restaging cystoscopy with repeat TURBT and biopsies.

Inset

Planning CT scan for concurrent chemoradiation therapy following maximal TURBT in a bladder cancer patient; radiation dose graded by color. The red outline encircles tumor location.

If a patient demonstrates complete response, concurrent chemoradiation continues to a total dose of 64-65 Gy. A minority of patients either fail to respond or progress during chemoradiation. In such patients who display aggressive resistant histology, immediate salvage radical cystectomy is recommended.

The NCI-funded Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has conducted six large multi-institution trials evaluating TMT with variations of radiation dose and chemotherapy. Highlights from these studies include:

  • 71 percent five-year cancer specific survival rate (pooled analyses)
  • 65 percent 10-year cancer specific survival rate (pooled analyses)
  • 87 percent of patients had no local disease recurrence
  • 80 percent of patients retained their bladder at five years and rates of late toxicity were low: 6 percent had significant (grade 3+) late urinary side effects, and 2 percent had significant late gastrointestinal side effects

Advertisement

Quality-of-life and urodynamic studies show 75 percent of patients with normally functioning bladders after TMT, while long-term survivors continue to report favorable qualities of life.

TMT: Discuss with eligible patients

The stepwise approach of TMT—involving TURBT, chemotherapy and radiation, coupled with post-treatment surveillance and response-adapted salvage therapy—offers patients a well-established option to retain their native bladder without compromising quality of life or treatment efficacy.

TMT should therefore be discussed as an alternative to radical cystectomy in all eligible patients, ideally at a multidisciplinary urologic oncology center.

Dr. Mian is on staff in the Department of Radiation Oncology in the Taussig Cancer Institute and Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Holly Pederson
July 25, 2024/Cancer/Research
Evaluating Risk Scores for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Black Women (Podcast)

Polygenic risk score could help predict who will develop this aggressive breast cancer

Reviewing dental scans
July 8, 2024/Cancer
A Call for More Interdisciplinary and Preventive Care in New Osteoradionecrosis Guidelines

New guidelines offer insight into emerging therapies, dental issues and more

Dr. AlHilli
July 3, 2024/Cancer/Patient Support
Prehabilitation Program Aims to Improve Outcomes for Older Patients with Ovarian or Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical trial to assess the value of nutritional, physical therapy and social supports prior to preoperative chemotherapy

Dr. Nahleh
June 26, 2024/Cancer/Patient Support
Systemic Treatment a Major Factor Impacting Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer with Brain Metastasis

Research demonstrates improved overall survival for patients receiving comprehensive treatment for breast cancer in addition to radiation or surgical intervention for brain cancer

Image showing Dr. Gupta
June 20, 2024/Cancer/Research
Trailblazing Urothelial Cancer Treatments (Podcast)

Platinum-eligible phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab yields ‘unprecedented data’

Dr. Grobmyer and team
June 14, 2024/Cancer/Innovations
Fatima bint Mubarak Center Addresses Inequities in Cancer Care

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute brings multidisciplinary care, precision oncology and clinical research to the United Arab Emirates

Lung cancer cells
June 5, 2024/Cancer/Research
Impact of Tumor Burden on Survival for Patients with EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Treated with Osimertinib

Extent of baseline burden impacts progression-free and overall survival

cancer cells
June 4, 2024/Cancer/Research
Researchers Identify Tumor Microbiome Differences in Early- vs. Average-Onset Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Further study warranted to better understand the clinical implications of these findings

Ad