Check out our latest data in these core cardiovascular areas
Below we share recent volumes and clinical outcomes from two programs in Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute: heart failure and recovery, and electrophysiology and cardiac pacing.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
EP lab procedure volume, 2020-2024
EP lab procedure volume in 2024, highest annual total to date
Lead extraction procedures, 2020-2024
Clinical success rate for lead extractions
In-hospital mortality, vs. benchmark of 1.2% (Kusumoto et al., Heart Rhythm. 2017)
Atrial fibrillation ablations, 2020-2024
Major complication rate, vs. benchmark of 2.5% (Hsu et al., J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023)
Ventricular arrhythmia ablations, 2020-2024
Major complication rate, vs. benchmark of 10% (Cronin et al., Heart Rhythm. 2020)
Watchman™ and Amplatzer Amulet™ devices placed for LAAO procedures (includes both EP and interventional cases), 2020-2024
Major complication rate within 7 days of LAAO device implant, vs. benchmark of 2.7%-8.7% in published trials (Boersma et al., Eur Heart J. 2016)
Number of heart transplants, including 2 pediatric cases
Number of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations
Number of patient referrals for advanced heart failure
| Time frame | Cleveland Clinic | U.S. benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| At 1 year | 96.9% | 92.2% |
| At 3 years | 89.0% | 84.7% |
| Time frame | ||
| At 1 year | ||
| Cleveland Clinic | ||
| 96.9% | ||
| U.S. benchmark | ||
| 92.2% | ||
| At 3 years | ||
| Cleveland Clinic | ||
| 89.0% | ||
| U.S. benchmark | ||
| 84.7% |
Number of LVAD implants over the past 3 years, among the highest in the U.S.
1-year post-implant survival, primary LVADs (vs. 87.1% STS Intermacs survival) (for period 7/1/23-12/31/24)
1-year post-implant survival, continuous-flow LVADs for destination therapy (vs. 85.0% STS Intermacs survival) (for period 7/1/23-12/31/24)
| Time frame | Cleveland Clinic | STS Intermacs |
|---|---|---|
| 12 months | 85.8% | 83.0% |
| 48 months | 61.2% | 56.3% |
| 60 months | 53.3% | 48.6% |
| Time frame | ||
| 12 months | ||
| Cleveland Clinic | ||
| 85.8% | ||
| STS Intermacs | ||
| 83.0% | ||
| 48 months | ||
| Cleveland Clinic | ||
| 61.2% | ||
| STS Intermacs | ||
| 56.3% | ||
| 60 months | ||
| Cleveland Clinic | ||
| 53.3% | ||
| STS Intermacs | ||
| 48.6% |
Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute has a long tradition of reporting volume and outcomes data across various subspecialty areas. For more information like the data above, visit clevelandclinic.org/hvtioutcomes and clevelandclinic.org/e15.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Freely accessible LEADconnection.org is a one-stop shop for advice and more
Connecting interactions adds clarity to the full patient story
Large retrospective analysis may prompt prospective studies
The Center for Environment, Place and Health Research connects clinicians with mapping tools and other real-world data resources to help guide medical insights
A scannable recap of recent volumes and clinical metrics from Cleveland Clinic
Nurse manager turns a patient safety concern into a data-driven effort to improve protocols and inspire innovation
AHA statement provides the latest comprehensive, evidence-based information
Building a cohesive data structure delivers trusted insights, inspires innovation