Locations:
Search IconSearch

Why It’s Worth Your (and Your Patients’) Time to Verify Penicillin Allergy

19 in 20 will not have an allergic reaction

penicllium-mold_650x450

Nearly 10 percent of the U.S. population self-reports an allergy to penicillin, thereby limiting their access to this effective antibiotic. But true IgE-mediated allergy to penicillin is uncommon. Moreover, evidence accumulated over the past decade and a half suggests that alternative antibiotics are less effective and cause more complications than penicillins.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The answer to this problem is simple: Verify the accuracy of this diagnosis before the patient requires another antibiotic.

“In our experience, 19 of 20 patients will be skin-test negative and able to tolerate penicillin without an adverse reaction,” says David Lang, MD, Chairman of the Department of Allergy and Immunology at Cleveland Clinic and President-elect of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI).

Three reasons explain why the overwhelming majority of patients with a history of penicillin allergy will have negative skin tests, he says:

  1. The previous exposure to penicillin entailed a coincident adverse experience that did not reflect an allergic reaction.
  2. An adverse reaction occurred based on a non-IgE-mediated mechanism that did not include immunologic memory, making this reaction unlikely to occur on re-exposure to penicillin.
  3. An IgE-mediated (true allergic) reaction did occur; however, with avoidance of penicillins, the potential for an allergic reaction waned over time.

Challenging the diagnosis

With concerns about the effects of inappropriate antibiotic use on antimicrobial resistance, the AAAAI, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America looked into the issue. Their recent guidelines for evaluating patients for penicillin allergy are designed to help practitioners differentiate true allergic reactions from sensitivities and safely evaluate reported penicillin allergy. The guidelines delineate risk stratification for penicillin allergy evaluation.

Advertisement

Defining low-risk patients

Very low and low-risk patients include those reporting reactions that are unlikely to be allergic in nature, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, sleepless nights or rash without pruritis, as well as family history of penicillin allergy.

Unknown reactions not compatible with an IgE mechanism that occurred more than 10 years prior also render a patient low-risk.

These patients may be prescribed a course of amoxicillin or challenge dose of amoxicillin under observation.

“Most people are in this category: They simply had an adverse experience that was never verified as a true allergic reaction and resulted in their being mislabeled with a penicillin allergy,” says Dr. Lang.

Testing moderate-risk patients

Patients considered at moderate pre-test probability for allergic reaction with re-exposure to a penicillin should be skin tested. If the skin testing is negative, an amoxicillin challenge under observation should follow.

“These patients may have reported cutaneous symptoms such as urticaria, pruritis, angioedema or flushing, or a reaction with features of IgE, but not anaphylaxis. Symptoms also may be respiratory, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal in nature,” says Dr. Lang.

High-risk patients merit referral

Patients at high risk for penicillin allergy include those who experienced anaphylaxis, had reactions to multiple beta-lactam antibiotics or had a positive penicillin skin test. They should be referred to an allergist/immunologist for further evaluation.

A new level of detail

The new, triple society-authored guidelines contain comprehensive detail on symptoms, procedures and contraindications to testing, along with the management of drug-challenge reactions. The information is designed to provide clinicians with the knowledge necessary to be comfortable moving ahead with evaluation of patients with unverified penicillin allergy.

Advertisement

“It is in the best interest of these patients to determine whether they are truly allergic to penicillin. If they are not, this opens the door to using a class of antimicrobial agents with fewer complications, while increasing the likelihood of a improved healthcare outcomes,” says Dr. Lang.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Controls for a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform
March 23, 2026/Pulmonary/News & Insight

Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Lung Lesions: What Matters Beyond Navigation

A physician's perspective on confirmation imaging, diagnostic confidence and choosing the right robotic platform for patients

portraits of Joy Ussavarungsi, MD, and Les Tolle, MD
March 16, 2026/Pulmonary/Podcast

Understanding LAM: Insights Into This Rare Lung Disease (Podcast)

A look into recent developments in the diagnosis of LAM and its clinical presentation

Peter Mazzone, MD, MPH; Angel Coz-Yataco, MD; and Matt Siuba, DO
February 11, 2026/Pulmonary/Podcast

2025 CHEST Conference Highlights (Podcast)

Takeaways from the most recent annual meeting centered around clinical advances, AI integration and professional development

patient coughing
January 23, 2026/Pulmonary/News & Insight

Redefining Bronchiectasis Management: Multidisciplinary Teams and Modern Therapies at Cleveland Clinic Florida

Recent breakthroughs have brought attention to a previously overlooked condition

physician checking patient breathing
January 20, 2026/Pulmonary/Podcast

Treating CTEPH: Surgery, Medication or Balloon Angioplasty? (Podcast)

A review of treatment options for patients who may not qualify for surgery

Patient injecting herself
January 12, 2026/Pulmonary/News & Insight

Advances in COPD Treatment: The Role of Biologics

Looking at the real-world impact and the future pipeline of targeted therapies

Medical Ventilator
December 19, 2025/Pulmonary/Critical Care

Closing the Ventilator Training Gap with SEVA

The progressive training program aims to help clinicians improve patient care

Patient receiving shot in arm
November 26, 2025/Pulmonary/Asthma

Biologics for Asthma and COPD: What Providers Need to Know

New breakthroughs are shaping the future of COPD management and offering hope for challenging cases

Ad