January 6, 2020

Acute Reperfusion Therapies Are Improving Ischemic Stroke Survival, Database Study Shows

Greatest benefits seen with combined thrombolytic and thrombectomy therapies

thrombolysis of a clot in ischemic stroke

Among U.S. Medicare patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke from 2009 to 2013, 30-day mortality declined for those who received reperfusion therapies but not for those who did not, reveals a Medicare database analysis published by Cleveland Clinic researchers in the Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (2019 Dec 10 [Epub ahead of print]). One-year mortality rates improved across the board during the same period, with particular improvement among patients who received reperfusion with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) or both.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Declining death rates from ischemic stroke coincided with the increasing use of acute reperfusion therapy,” says lead author Shumei Man, MD, PhD, a neurologist with Cleveland Clinic’s Cerebrovascular Center. “IVT and EVT were each associated with survival benefit, but the greatest advantage was evident for patients who received both therapies, followed by those receiving EVT.”

The backdrop: Nationwide efforts to reduce stroke’s impact

Over the past 20 years, stroke incidence and mortality rates have declined in the U.S. While reduced incidence has been attributed to a focus on managing cardiovascular risk factors, reasons for reduced mortality have not been well explored. Several randomized trials have shown that IVT and EVT, when given for acute ischemic stroke, improve functional outcomes, but epidemiologic assessment of the increasing use of these therapies has been lacking.

Study design and results

Data for the current analysis were drawn from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review national database between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. The study included 1,070,574 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke.

During the study period, the proportion of stroke patients treated with IVT ranged from 5.2% in 2009 to 8.3% in 2013, increasing by 60%. Treatment with EVT increased by 130% over the same period, but annual use rates were less than 1% during the entire period, reaching just 0.8% in 2013.

The study assessed trends in 30-day and one-year mortality following a stroke according to the acute therapies received, with multivariate logistic regression models generated to adjust for demographics and comorbidities.

Advertisement

Trends in 30-day mortality across the study period were as follows:

  • Patients treated with neither IVT nor EVT, no change (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01)
  • Patients treated with IVT but not EVT, 13% reduction (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92)
  • Patients treated with EVT but not IVT, 25% reduction (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95)
  • Patients treated with both IVT and EVT, 37% reduction (HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.77)

Trends in one-year mortality across the study period were as follows:

  • Neither IVT nor EVT, 19% reduction (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.83)
  • IVT but not EVT, 22% reduction (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.81)
  • EVT but not IVT, 33% reduction (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81)
  • Both IVT and EVT, 38% reduction (HR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.73)

Strong support for reperfusion therapy

According to Dr. Man, benefits of the increased use of reperfusion therapy over time were clearly evident in the study. Moreover, each therapy was associated with incrementally increasing benefit over each year of the study. Technical advancements have been ongoing in EVT, which likely explains the improving trends for that therapy. And although there were no procedural changes in IVT during the study period, it is possible that quality improvement efforts shortened the time to IVT administration over time and perhaps broadened IVT use to include milder strokes.

The authors note that improvements in one-year mortality were seen among all groups, including those who received no reperfusion therapy at all. “This likely reflects changes over time in patient care following acute hospitalization,” says senior author Ken Uchino, MD, Director of Research and Education for Cleveland Clinic’s Cerebrovascular Center. “But it’s not known to what extent this is due to prevention of complications after stroke, prevention of stroke recurrence or other changes in healthcare that helped reduce death rates.” Regardless, one-year mortality improved the most among patients who received some form of acute reperfusion.

Notably, the study period preceded the publication of several pivotal trials that demonstrated improved outcomes from more modern methods of endovascular thrombectomy. “Use of these methods has increased since 2013,” Dr. Uchino observes, “and we would expect mortality rates to have further improved since then.”

Advertisement

Moreover, while the study adjusted for potential confounding factors such as age, sex, race and multiple comorbidities, the researchers could not adjust for stroke severity, and patients younger than 65 were not represented.

Despite these limitations, the study is very clear about a couple of key points: 93% of Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke received no reperfusion therapy, and this was the only patient group that saw no gains in short-term mortality over the study period.

“Reperfusion therapy is still greatly underused,” says Dr. Man. “Our study indicates that quality improvement efforts to increase its use present a real opportunity to save more lives. More work can be done to make people aware of stroke signs and the need to call 911 early, as well as to streamline pre-hospital and in-hospital processes to provide timely reperfusion therapy to as many patients as possible.”

Related Articles

22-NEU-2959102-CQD-Hero-650×450
June 15, 2022
MINDS Study Will Assess Lifestyle Interventions for Slowing Brain Pathology in Preclinical Stages

New grant-funded investigation illustrates impact and reach of Cleveland Clinic Brain Study

22-NEU-2671014-CQD-650×450-Type
March 9, 2022
A Closer Look at the Cleveland Clinic Brain Study

How the new longitudinal investigation could become the Framingham Heart Study of brain health

20-NEU-1959738 powered-exoskeleton-for-gait-training_650x450
October 23, 2020
Study Signals Potential of Powered Exoskeleton for Gait Training in Multiple Sclerosis

Pilot findings show good patient acceptance and safety, early hints of efficacy

20-NEU-1990660-sleep-symptoms-in-health-workers-650×450
October 21, 2020
Electronic Screening for Sleep Disorders Among Healthcare Workers Is Feasible – and Sorely Needed

Study finds high prevalence of symptoms, willingness to seek treatment

20-NEU-1946228 neurofilaments_650x450
September 9, 2020
Serum Neurofilament Light as a Progressive MS Biomarker: Guideposts for the Road Ahead

Panel outlines research priorities around a promising alternative to imaging markers

20-NEU-1951118_Impella-temporary-LVAD_650x450_ (1)
September 4, 2020
Study Finds Clues to Acute Neurologic Events With Short-Term Impella Cardiac Support

Suspected factors include antithrombotic intensity, time on device, presence of thrombocytopenia

20-NEU-1929179 deep-brain-stimulation-for-TBI_650x450
September 3, 2020
Could DBS of the Cerebellar Dentate Nucleus Enhance Post-TBI Rehabilitation?

Preclinical studies will assess whether method developed for stroke recovery curbs deficits after brain injury

20-NEU-1932968-sleep-apnea-in-women_650x450
August 12, 2020
Is Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA Being Denied to Many Patients Who Can Benefit Most?

Study finds high coverage denial for women, patients with prior oral appliance use

Ad