An Important but Limited Step Forward in Personalized Multiple Sclerosis Care

Dr. Robert Fox puts a tissue marker study in context

16-neu-2602-trapp-650×450

Treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2018 remains far from what can be described as personalized medicine, but an important initial step toward more personalized management of MS relapses has been achieved by researchers with University Medical Center Goettingen in Germany. So contends Cleveland Clinic neurologist Robert Fox, MD, in an editorial accompanying the German study published online by JAMA Neurology on February 5, 2018.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The retrospective cohort study evaluated the response to apheresis in relation to histopathologically defined immunopathological patterns of MS in 69 patients. As detailed in the published study report, the investigation provides the first evidence that short-term treatment response is related to the underlying inflammatory pathology within MS lesions.

“These observations further support the clinical relevance of MS lesion patterns and suggest that they may be useful in better understanding the heterogeneity in treatment response to MS therapies,” Dr. Fox writes in his editorial. He adds that the study is also helpful in providing further evidence supporting apheresis as short-term therapy for central nervous system demyelination.

At the same time, he notes, the study’s applicability is limited by the fact that all 69 patients underwent brain biopsy, which is highly unusual and invasive for MS patients in real-world practice. “The future of personalized medicine in MS requires markers that are easily obtained and measured,” Dr. Fox writes, citing fluid or imaging biomarkers as examples. Until such markers are identified, the tissue markers from the current study will remain only a research tool for the occasional patient who requires a brain biopsy.

Advertisement

The full Fox editorial is available here, and the Goettingen researchers’ study is available here.

Related Articles

23-NEU-3516858-brain-trauma-650×450
Neurotrauma Guidelines: Where They’ve Been, Where They’re Headed and How to Make the Most of Them

Q&A with Brain Trauma Foundation guideline architect Gregory Hawryluk, MD, PhD

20-NEU-2020111 neuroimmunology_650x450
Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders: Treatable Conditions That Should Not Be Missed

Q&A with newly arrived autoimmune neurology specialist Amy Kunchok, MD

20-NEU-1984276 multimodal-monitoring_650x450
Multimodal Monitoring in the Neuro ICU: Essentials for Clinicians (Podcast)

A neurocritical care specialist shares what’s spurring growth of this new evaluation approach

central vein sign in multiple sclerosis
New Frontiers in Diagnosing and Monitoring Multiple Sclerosis (Podcast)

Get ready for central vein sign and optical coherence tomography

20-NEU-1938374-migraine_650x450
CGRP Antagonists for Decreasing Migraine Frequency: A Primer

How these new drugs fit into practice two years out from their first approvals

20-NEU-1892171 CQD_650x450_CCC-1901608_06-03-20_0443
What’s Afoot and What’s Ahead for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

A conversation on the state of physiatry with the AAPM&R’s Vice President

Ad