November 7, 2019/Primary Care/News & Insights

Aspirin: Still Learning After 4,000 Years

Its origins, uses and limitations


By Kenneth C. Cummings, III, MD, MS, FASA


Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and its progenitors are valuable medications with a history spanning at least four millennia. An enormous number of patients take aspirin for a variety of reasons, and managing their therapy around the time of surgery can be challenging.1 Even after 4,000 years, we are still learning about these remarkable drugs.

What we still need to learn

Over the years, we have learned the broad outlines of using aspirin to prevent and treat cardiovascular disease, to relieve pain and inflammation (its original purpose), and to prevent stent thrombosis.

However, many details remain to be filled in. We need to better define groups who should and should not take aspirin for primary prevention. We also need to understand aspirin’s role in cancer chemoprevention, to find better ways to mitigate its undesirable effects, and to study its role in treating myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.

Finally, we need to determine which (if any) patients without coronary stents will benefit from continuing their aspirin perioperatively or even initiating aspirin therapy preoperatively.

Will humanity still be using salicylates 4,000 years from now? Probably not. But what we have learned and will continue to learn from this remarkable group of medications will certainly inform new and better therapies in the years to come.


A brief history of aspirin

Medicines made from the bark of willow trees (genus Salix) and other salicylate-rich plants have been used as analgesics since at least 2000 bce. References exist on the Ebers Papyrus from Egypt (circa 1550 bce) as well as on ancient Sumerian tablets.2 It was not until the 18th century, however, that Edmund Stone identified salicin, a glycoside of salicylic acid and the active compound in willow bark extract. Searching for a way to reduce the burning throat and dyspepsia caused by salicylic acid, chemists at Friedrich Bayer & Company—the same group that popularized heroin as a “nonaddictive” form of morphine—eventually produced acetylsalicylic acid. Bayer gave the compound the brand name “Aspirin,” using “A” for acetylation, “-spir-“ for Spirea (another common source of salicylic acid), and “-in” as a conventional drug-name ending.3

In the 1940s, a general practitioner in California named Lawrence Craven recognized that many of his post-tonsillectomy patients had to be hospitalized for bleeding after he started recommending they use aspirin-containing chewing gum for pain relief.4 Under the then-debated hypothesis that myocardial infarction (MI) involves thrombosis, he recommended that adult men should take aspirin daily. He believed that women had lower rates of MI because they were more likely to take aspirin, something that men did not view as a “masculine” thing to do.

In a series of letters in journals such as the Mississippi Valley Medical Journal,5 Craven reported his observations of very low rates of MI and no strokes in aspirin users. Given the nonrigorous nature of his research and the obscure journals in which he published, his findings languished for many years. Ironically, he died of an MI in 1957.

In the late 1960s, Weiss et al reported that aspirin rapidly and irreversibly inhibits platelet aggregation.6 In parallel, using biological assays in work that eventually led to the Nobel Prize, Vane discovered that inflammation involves the de novo synthesis of prostaglandins and that aspirin directly inhibits this synthesis.7 Further work connecting these lines of investigation led us to understand that platelet aggregation is enhanced by the prostaglandin derivative thromboxane A2, produced by cyclooxygenase-1, and that aspirin irreversibly inhibits this enzyme by acetylation.

Learning when to use aspirin

After decades of research ranging from the Physicians’ Health Study to well-named trials such as ARRIVE, ASCEND, and ASPREE, we now know that taking daily low doses of aspirin for primary prevention can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer—but at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding.8


Which patients will gain the most benefit and incur the least risk is still debated. What is certain, however, is that aspirin has an important role in acute coronary syndromes, secondary prevention of MI and stroke, and prevention of thrombosis after coronary stent placement. In the perioperative setting, we are learning that aspirin may benefit patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, a recently described clinical entity associated with surprisingly high mortality rates.9,10


  1. Prabhakaran A, Whinney C. Should we stop aspirin before noncardiac surgery? Cleve Clin J Med. 2019;86(8):518–521.
  2. Jeffreys D. Aspirin: The Remarkable Story of a Wonder Drug. New York: Bloomsbury; 2008.
  3. Mann CC, Plummer ML. The Aspirin Wars: Money, Medicine, and 100 Years of Rampant Competition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1991.
  4. Miner J, Hoffhines A. The discovery of aspirin’s antithrombotic effects. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(2):179–186.
  5. Craven LL. Prevention of coronary and cerebral thrombosis. Miss Valley Med J. 1956;78(5):213–215.
  6. Weiss HJ, Aledort LM, Kochwa S. The effect of salicylates on the hemostatic properties of platelets in man. J Clin Invest. 1968;47(9):2169–2180.
  7. Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nat New Biol. 1971;231(25):232–235.
  8. US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(6):396–404.
  9. Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):564–578.
  10. George R, Menon VP, Edathadathil F, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery—incidence and predictors from a prospective observational cohort study at an Indian tertiary care centre. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(19):e0402.

Please note: This is an abridged version of an article originally published in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

Related Articles

How to Respond to Flu Vaccine Doubters

12 reasons people give for not wanting the influenza vaccine

Flu vaccine
January 30, 2019/Primary Care/News & Insights
Influenza Vaccination: A 2018-2019 Update

How will the components and uptake of this year’s influenza vaccine impact patient health?

Flu virus
January 23, 2019/Primary Care/News & Insights
Influenza Update 2018–2019: 100 Years After the Great Pandemic

A centennial year update on epidemiology, transmission and treatment of influenza.

December 12, 2018/Primary Care/News & Insights
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: A Valuable Tool in Primary Care

It’s safe and accurate, but who should be tested?

October 31, 2018/Primary Care/News & Insights
Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Class 1 Recommendation That Deserves to Be Treated Like One

Long-overdue efforts to make it more widespread start to take hold