Locations:
Search IconSearch
June 15, 2022/Cancer/Research

Assessing the Benefit of Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Multi-center study indicates benefit is associated with risk stratification and the utilization of radiation therapy

22-CNR-2960980-CQD-Hero-650×450-breast-cancer-DCIS

A newly released study examining adjuvant therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) following breast-conserving surgery confirms previous findings on the role of radiation and demonstrates when endocrine therapy may benefit patients, using a seven-gene predictive DCIS biosignature.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Past studies such as NSABP B24 and NSABP B35 have looked at the role of endocrine therapy in DCIS and have shown a benefit,” says Chirag Shah, MD, a physician in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Radiation Oncology, Co-director of the Breast Cancer Program and second author on the study. “However, we wanted to ascertain if all patients derive a consistent benefit and if some do not require endocrine therapy given that endocrine therapy is associated with side effects and additional costs.”

Study methods and analysis

Patients with DCIS have traditionally been treated with breast-conserving surgery, followed by radiotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy based on multiple randomized and prospective clinical trials. However, those trials have failed to identify subsets of patients who do not benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy or endocrine therapy after breast-conserving surgery.

The multi-center study, which was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in June, evaluated the ability of a seven-gene predictive DCIS biosignature to assess the impact of endocrine therapy on 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence risk after breast-conserving surgery alone or with radiation therapy.

“We looked at the three groups that the biosignature defines – low risk, elevated risk and residual risk – and evaluated the impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy for each, as well as the interaction of radiation and endocrine therapy,” says Dr. Shah. The three groups are defined by decision scores (DS) from the DCISionRT® test with integrated residual risk subtype (RRt) by PreludeDX: Low risk (DS ≤ 2.8), elevated risk (DS > 2.8 without RRt) and residual risk (DS > 2.8 with RRt). The groups were assessed for 10-year total ipsilateral breast recurrence risk by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis.

Advertisement

Results and clinical implications

The study included approximately 900 women who were treated with breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy and with or without endocrine therapy. Results were as follows:

  • For low-risk patients, there was no benefit to endocrine therapy in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery without radiation therapy. Also, no benefit was seen with radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. This was consistent with previous studies evaluating the biosignature.
  • For patients in the elevated risk group, there was a benefit to the addition of radiation, but no additional benefit to endocrine therapy for those who received radiation. However, there was a benefit to endocrine therapy for patients who did not receive radiation.
  • In the residual risk group, there was no benefit to endocrine therapy for patients who received radiation; while radiation reduced rates of recurrence, rates of recurrence in this cohort remained elevated compared to other groups. Among patients not receiving radiation, endocrine therapy reduced recurrence rates.

Dr. Shah says the results point to the need for conversations and informed decision-making with patients in all three groups.

“It spurs the discussion with low-risk patients about whether surgery alone is adequate given their low risk of recurrence,” he says. “For elevated-risk patients, perhaps a short course of radiation should be considered as a substitute for endocrine therapy. Similarly, do we need to adjust or intensify our treatment strategy in patients with residual risk, given that they are still at an elevated risk regardless of what we do?”

Advertisement

Dr. Shah and his colleagues would like to conduct follow-up research, tracking the study participants for 10 years to determine long-term outcomes in patients with breast-conserving surgery with or without radiation therapy and/or endocrine therapy.

Advertisement

Related Articles

DNA
October 10, 2024/Cancer/Research
Blocking YES1 Protein Resensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Treatment

Obstructing key protein allows for increased treatment uptake for taxane chemotherapy

Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia
September 23, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pomalidomide Effective in Treating Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia

Oral medication reduces epistaxis and improves quality of life for patients with rare vascular disorder

Radiation therapy
September 17, 2024/Cancer/Research
ASTRO 2024 Highlights

A preview for radiation oncologists

Dr. Shilpa Gupta
September 16, 2024/Cancer/Research
New Studies Reinforce Benefits of Combination Treatment for Urothelial Carcinoma

Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab benefited patients, regardless of biomarker expression

Before and after scan
August 28, 2024/Cancer/Research
Case Study: Patient with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Has No Remaining Evidence of Disease

Treatment involved checkpoint inhibitor, surgery and intravesical therapy

Dr. Maciejewski
August 23, 2024/Cancer/Research
Studies Evaluate Anti-Complement Inhibitors for Treating Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Researchers Assess Real-Life Experiences of Patients Treated Outside of Clinical Trials

Dr. Raza
August 19, 2024/Cancer/Research
Understanding the Role of Palliative Care in AL Amyloidosis

Multi-specialty coordination essential for improving quality of life

Ad