Locations:
Search IconSearch
September 27, 2017/Cancer/Research

Beyond Pack-Years: Assessing & Treating HPV+ Oropharynx Cancer

20 pack-years better indicator of high-risk disease

HPV-illus_650x450

Incorporation of longer terms of smoke exposure and other relevant parameters into disease classification may improve overall risk-stratification paradigms and strengthen clinical trial designs for patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharynx cancer, according to a new study.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Smokers are known to have worse outcomes and shorter survival than nonsmokers in cases of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer,” says Shlomo Koyfman, MD, senior author on the study and a radiation oncologist at Cleveland Clinic. “Our analysis showed that 20 pack-years of smoke exposure is a more reliable indicator of high-risk disease than the typical 10-year cutoff affords.”

Additional relevant variables include Charlson comorbidity score and primary tumor size, according to the study, “Impact of smoking on outcomes in HPV+ oropharynx cancer: It′s more than pack-years,” which is being presented this week at the ASTRO conference in San Diego.

Finding an overlooked indicator

Suspicious that existing risk-stratification tools and clinical trial designs underappreciate the effect that higher pack-years and other indicators can have, Dr. Koyfman and the team set out to examine the impact of smoking status on clinical outcomes in HPV+ squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

They found that active smoking at the time of diagnosis and/or continued smoking through treatment represented the most powerful predictor of both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

“We weren’t surprised by this,” says Dr. Koyfman. “It’s pretty straightforward.”

The second most-powerful predictor was exposure to 20 pack-years of smoke or more.

“What did surprise us is that most clinical trials and risk-stratification schemes cutoff their assessments at 10 pack-years when both 20 pack-years and active smoking represent more meaningful indicators,” he continues.

Advertisement

Broad range of patients and tumor types

The study involved a retrospective statistical analysis of 484 patients with HPV+ SCC of the oropharynx between 2001 and 2005 whose cancers ranged from stage I-IVB. Participants included 94 active smokers (19 percent), 226 former smokers (47 percent) and 164 never smokers (34 percent).

About half of the active and former smokers (247 patients, 51 percent) had at least 10 pack-years of smoke exposure, and about one-third of them (179 patients, 37 percent) had at least 20 pack-years exposure.

Analyses performed on the cohort included univariate, multivariate, Charlson scoring of comorbidities and primary tumor sizing.

A detailed analysis

On univariate analysis, all smoking parameters (any smoker, > 10 pack-years, > 20 pack-years and active smokers) were significantly associated with inferior OS. Multivariate analysis showed active smoking was the smoking-related variable most strongly associated with inferior OS and PFS (HR = 3.4 and HR 2.2, respective univariate and multivariate analysis).

Other parameters significantly associated with inferior OS and PFS included higher Charlson scores (HR = 4.2 and HR = 4.0, univariate and multivariate analysis) and T4 primary tumor size (HR = 2.9 and HR = 3.0).

When analyzed by pack-years in a separate multivariate analysis, smoking 20 or more pack-years was significantly associated with worse OS and PFS (HR = 3.1 and HR = 1.6), in addition to higher Charlson scores and T4 disease.

“We conclude that future studies should validate these findings and potentially replace the 10 pack-year cutoff with either a 20 pack-year cutoff or active smoking cutoff,” says Dr. Koyfman.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Masked patient with physician
June 15, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Managing Infection Risk in the Era of Cell Therapy

Long-term immune effects reshape preventative strategies and timelines

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Acupuncture in wrist
May 29, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Can Acupuncture Really Help with Cancer Treatment Side Effects?

Evidence-based recommendations for managing pain, nausea and other treatment reactions

Ad