Locations:
Search IconSearch
June 21, 2021/Cancer/Research

In-Depth Diagnostic Testing in Older Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

May not translate to better outcomes

Human bone marrow under the microscope.

A new multicenter study coauthored by Cleveland Clinic investigators shows that the survival benefit of complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE) may not outweigh the associated potential costs, pain and anxiety in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The findings, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s 2021 annual meeting, reflect experience in fee-for-service Medicare patients and point to a need for more careful patient selection to eliminate unnecessary CDEs while maximizing therapeutic outcomes.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

MDS is the most common myeloid malignancy in the United States. CDE to definitively establish the diagnosis of MDS requires at minimum a bone marrow biopsy and other supporting studies including fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosomal analysis.

“Because these tests are painful and expensive, clinicians have debated whether they’re necessary for better care in certain patients,” says Sudipto Mukherjee, MD, PhD, MPH, staff in the Department of Hematology and Oncology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and lead author of the study. “We conducted this study to answer that question.”

Study at a glance

Approximately 17,000 MDS patients aged 66 or older identified in a Medicare database from 2011 to 2014 were included in the study. All patients included in the study had no more than one cytopenia and no dependence on blood transfusions in the 16 weeks before or after diagnosis of MDS.

To assess the value of CDE in this population, the investigators focused on variables that provided clinical context about the decision regarding the testing. They included age, race, sex, number of Elixhauser comorbid conditions, nursing home status, prior history of cancer, gastrointestinal bleeding and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Impact on outcomes, and whether CDE led to therapy initiation, particularly use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and lenalidomide, were also explored.

Combinations of factors that resulted in little clinical justification for CDE were determined with a classification and regression-tree analysis, a machine learning approach. Survival outcomes in patients who had and had not undergone CDE were compared with a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Advertisement

Choosing the appropriate patients

Overall, just over half (51%) of the study population received CDE. Nearly half of them (46.6%) were aged 80 or older, 33.6% had at least five chronic conditions and 4.8% were nursing home residents.

In MDS patients that had an isolated cytopenia and no transfusion needs, the investigators found that 46% of those aged 80 years or older and 57.7% of those aged 66 to 79 years underwent CDE in the absence of a history of CKD or colonoscopy or received HMA or ESA post CDE. In the group that had no cytopenias, 56.2% of those who received CDE did not have a prior history of cancer or progress to acute myeloid leukemia in the first year following MDS diagnosis or received HMA or ESA.

In adjusted regression analyses, no survival benefit was associated with receipt of CDE (P = 0.24).

“Our findings show that careful patient selection may reduce unnecessary CDE for older MDS patients and should be a priority in clinical decision-making as a way to promote patient-centered care and minimize use of low-value procedures that may be of limited benefit,” concludes Dr. Mukherjee.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Acupuncture in wrist
May 29, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Can Acupuncture Really Help with Cancer Treatment Side Effects?

Evidence-based recommendations for managing pain, nausea and other treatment reactions

Head and neck cancer illustration
May 28, 2026/Cancer

What Is the Outlook for Treatment De-Intensification Strategies for Head & Neck Cancer?

Emerging data and practice changes reduce toxicity burden of treatment

Young patient with doctor
May 26, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Coming of Age with Cancer

Understanding supports for adolescent and young adult patients

Patient with nurse

Supporting our Patients Living with Cancer and Beyond

Reframing cancer survivorship

Ad