Advertisement
Pioneering and refining the approach in pyeloplasty, nephrectomy and more
Low anterior access (LAA) can further enhance the benefits of single-port (SP) robotic approaches in certain urologic surgeries, including pyeloplasty, partial nephrectomy and ureteric reimplant, according to multiple reports and extensive experience at Cleveland Clinic.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
“The single-port robotic system allowed us to further regionalize surgeries and avoid the intraperitoneal space,” says Jihad Kaouk, MD, Director of the Center of Advanced Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery at the Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute. “With the addition of low anterior access, we can spare upper abdominal muscles, improve cosmesis and decrease postoperative pain, creating a better perioperative and postoperative experience for our patients.”
According to Dr. Kaouk, the SP robotic system allows for the most minimally invasive surgery available to date by simultaneously introducing three multijointed, wristed surgical instruments; a steerable 3D high-definition camera; and an assistant accessory port into the abdomen through one small incision. The single arm allows 360-degree multiquadrant access. This design provides improved maneuverability through limited surgical fields and permits new and different surgical routes that have not been feasible before.
The SP system makes possible a more streamlined surgical technique for urologic procedures, such as with direct percutaneous access into the bladder for transvesical prostatectomy (opioid-sparing outpatient radical prostatectomy) and direct access into the retroperitoneum for various upper tract procedures. This allows for the complete preservation of the peritoneum and all intraperitoneal organs. In a retroperitoneal approach, surgeons can perform partial nephrectomies for tumors located on the anterior surface of the kidney and are not limited to posteriorly located tumors, as is the case with standard retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomies.
Advertisement
Under the direction of Dr. Kaouk, Cleveland Clinic was the first to report using LAA with the SP robot for pyeloplasty and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. A report from the 20th meeting of the European Urology Association demonstrated that the technique enables opioid-sparing recovery and discharge within 24 hours for anterior, posterior and lateral tumors.
“The SP robotic system solves the problem of the working distance from an inferior incision to the kidney, even when working in the upper pole,” says Dr. Kaouk.
LAA access involves a single 3 cm incision two fingers’ breadth above the superior pubic ramus. Then, the surgeon performs blunt finger dissection to open the extraperitoneal space for the insertion of the purpose-built SP access kit.
The surgeon preserves the peritoneum by gently pushing it down before inserting the kit. The SP robot is then docked at an acute angle towards the ipsilateral kidney, with the camera either at 6 or 12 o’clock depending on the location of the tumor.
The video below shows the full technique through specimen retrieval.
“Our carefully selected patients love this approach,” notes Dr. Kaouk, “because recovery is faster and less painful, and cosmesis is improved. It has also allowed us to expand our indications for single-port surgery as we can reach more tumors retroperitoneally, even those located on the anterior surface of the kidney.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Applications, outcomes and untapped potential
Fully-automated process uses preop CT, baseline GFR to estimate post-nephrectomy renal function
Revolutionizing pediatric urology with a new, less invasive approach
What updated techniques, counseling and a changing workforce could mean
Retrospective study shows SGLT-2 inhibitors may lead to worse urologic outcomes
Early, individualized diagnosis and comprehensive management key to preserving fertility
Up to 3 days faster than waiting for urine culture results
Review the advantages and disadvantages of newer interventions