Locations:
July 22, 2022/Cancer/Research

New Paradigm Evolving for Treatment of Advanced Gliomas

Molecular targets may offer noncytotoxic treatment path

22-CNR-3055674-CQD-Hero-650×450 gliomas

Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation have for several decades been the mainstay treatments for advanced gliomas. These therapies intend DNA damage. The cellular response to this damage is upregulation of the tumor suppressor protein p53 and its key co-factor p16. p53/p16. in turn, upregulation of these co-factors activates programs that attempt to repair the damage, and if the damage persists, trigger cell-suicides (apoptosis also known as cytotoxicity). But gliomas typically mutate and/or delete p53 and/or p16, thereby compromising chemotherapy and radiation efficacy. The chemotherapy and radiation treatments meanwhile do destroy p53/p16-intact normal cells to cause toxicities.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

It is logical therefore to pursue new treatment approaches that can work even when p53/p16 are absent and chemotherapy and radiation fail. Recent insights into the genetics and epigenetics (gene packaging) of gliomas point to specific molecular targets for such non-cytotoxic treatments, as described in a perspective and review appearing in International Journal of Cancer.

“Our reliance on crude impositions of stress, to thereby activate cytotoxicity as the means to terminate glioma and other cancer growth, is because we did not understand enough about the molecular mechanisms driving relentless cancer growth,” says senior author Yogen Saunthararajah, MD, staff and professor of medicine, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research in the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute. “Absent such understanding, we could not envisage elegant repairs to restore normal cell function and purpose. Instead, we have had to attempt to compel cell-suicides via physiologic insults. The conventional approach is a search and destroy paradigm. The state of the science today opens doors toward healing, repair paradigms instead, to hew more closely to core values and goals in medicine.”

Glial cells are physiologic and physical supports for the neurons in our brains; they are specialized cells vital for normal brain health. Genes that must be activated or turned on for a cell to become a specialized glial cell (‘late-glial genes’) have a critical property: They are wrapped up in our chromosomes, such that extensive unpackaging work, called chromatin remodeling, must be executed first. By contrast, the genes that all cells rely on to grow and divide (‘replication genes’), and the genes that are activated to define commitment toward becoming specialized glial cells (‘early-glial genes’), are accessible. They are configured or packaged in such a way that they are primed for activation, even in the earliest cell-type of all, the embryonic stem cell.

Advertisement

The cancer evolution process that produces lethal gliomas exploits these constitutive differences in chromatin configuration by selecting to disrupt the chromatin-remodeling machinery needed to activate final specialized glial cell programs. The consequence is glial lineage-committed cells that are stalled in their journeys to becoming specialized glial cells; they “spin their wheels,” growing and dividing in place, producing relentless, uncontrolled cell growth. Replication without onward glial-lineage differentiation equates to malignant self-replication.

The specific chromatin remodeling components disrupted vary by glioma subtype and by pediatric versus adult gliomas. The number of these abnormalities increases as the gliomas evolve and become more aggressive. The final consequence is the same, however: Increased friction against activating late-glial genes and thereby increased replications.

Stated another way, gliomas depend on packaging, or ‘off’ enzymes, to keep late-glial genes ‘off’ so that they can continue to replicate. Drugs to inhibit the ‘off’ enzymes that maintain late glial genes in a wrapped-up inaccessible configuration therefore resume glial-lineage journeys to stop their growth. Specific ‘off’ enzyme molecular targets reviewed and discussed in the article include DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1, IDH2), Enhancer of Zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2), chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 4 (CHD4) and dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH).

Advertisement

Dr. Saunthararajah explains, “Inhibitors of these enzymes have been shown to work well against gliomas in the test tube and in animals, exploiting the fact that gliomas are poised to transition into nondividing specialized glial cells. This transition occurs because they highly express key glial-differentiation-driving transcription factors NFIA, ATF3 and RUNX2, even as they are at the same time in no hurry to commit suicide with absent p53/p16.” He adds, “Such an approach aligns with a Hippocratic dictum that natural forces within us are the true healers of disease.”

To translate this science into effective clinical therapy for gliomas, the authors have identified two key challenges. The first is that many of the available drugs to inhibit ‘off’ enzymes much more easily penetrate into blood cells than into brain cancers, such that effects on blood counts in patients may limit the ability to achieve the intended target engagement in brain cancers. The second challenge is that gliomas disrupt several chromatin remodeling components needed to turn on late-glial genes, and engaging just one or two of their opposing ‘off’ enzymes may be insufficient; several may have to be inhibited safely.

To address these challenges, the researchers at University of Heidelberg and Cleveland Clinic have been developing new drugs that are better able to penetrate into brain cancers, and tailoring their dosages and schedules to limit or avoid cytotoxicity and side effects, to enable safe combinations of the drugs to inhibit several ‘off’ enzymes simultaneously. They are developing these drugs and regimens toward clinical trials, to hopefully be initiated in the near term.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Dedousis
November 2, 2026/Cancer/Podcast

Expanding Germline Genetic Testing in Oncology (Podcast)

Are we missing patients?

Dr. Hanlee Chung
October 29, 2026/Cancer/Podcast

Redefining Resectability in Advanced Rectal Cancer (Podcast)

Expanding treatment options for patients with advanced and recurrent rectal cancer

Patient and healthcare providers
October 28, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Desire for Preventative Screening is Strong Among People Experiencing Homelessness

Study analyzes creative approaches to support people facing housing insecurity

AI tech
October 26, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

AI Task Force Develops Unified Strategy to Integrate Tech Innovations

Evaluating AI initiatives and their impact on operations and care delivery

DNA test
October 23, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Early Genetic Testing Linked to Bilateral Mastectomy in Young BRCA Carriers with Breast Cancer

Study reinforces the importance of genetic testing prior to local therapy decisions

Dr. Arun Singh
October 21, 2026/Cancer

Preserving Vision in Uveal Melanoma (Podcast)

Understanding expanding treatment options and potential advances

Patient and doctor
October 9, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

First Radioligand Therapy Approved for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Adding 177Lu-PSMA-617 to ADT plus an ARPI cut the risk of radiographic progression or mortality by 28%

Woman running
October 7, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Pilot Project Aids Cancer Survivors in Achieving Healthy Weight and Reducing Recurrent Risk

New program will help patients improve fitness and manage weight after cancer treatment

Ad