Locations:
Search IconSearch
September 17, 2019/Cancer/Research

Postprostatectomy Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics Associated with Recurrence After Salvage Radiation

Relapse more likely with faster PSA doubling time

650×450-PSA-Test

The integration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics into a nomogram widely used to predict outcomes of salvage therapy offers physicians and patients a more nuanced, longer-term look at prostate cancer-specific outcomes.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

In 2007, a multi-institutional cohort led by Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute developed a nomogram to predict prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality at six years after salvage radiotherapy (SRT).

Almost a decade later, a study led by Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center radiation oncologist Rahul D. Tendulkar, MD, updated the nomogram with evidence that early initiation of SRT following radical prostatectomy (RP) reduced biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastases (DM).

The researchers’ most recent update to the nomogram was presented at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

“One critique of our previous update was the lack of PSA kinetics among the predictive factors,” says Shauna Campbell, DO, chief resident, radiation oncology, Cleveland Clinic. “This version of the nomogram adds initial postoperative PSA level and PSA doubling time [PSADT] to the picture.”

Refining the data

Early versions of the nomogram included patients from 10 consortium institutions, in many of whom researchers could not accurately estimate PSADT. For this study, the team narrowed the data to 1,005 patients from five institutions with available PSA kinetic data, and were able to calculate PSADT from 662 of them. Study subjects had node-negative prostate cancer with median pre-SRT PSA levels of 0.4 ng/mL, with a median follow up of five years.

The team performed multivariable analyses (MVA) by Cox proportional hazards regression to pinpoint risk factors for DM and BF (defined as post-SRT PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Most subjects had a Gleason score (GS) of 7 (n = 632, 63%), with 20% having GS 6 (n = 197) and 9% each with GS 8 (n = 86) and GS 9-10 (n = 90). Fifty-four percent of subjects had extraprostatic extension (EPE), and 19% had seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Margins were positive in 59%. Thirteen percent received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 46% were treated to ≥ 66 Gy and 20% received pelvic RT.

Advertisement

Impact of PSA kinetics

MVA showed that pre-SRT PSA and PSADT were significantly associated with BF, along with GS, surgical margins, use of ADT, RT dose ≥ 66 Gy, pelvic nodal RT and SVI.

PSADT and pre-SRT PSA were also significantly associated with DM, in addition to GS, surgical margins, SVI and pelvic nodal RT. Specifically, PSADT of less than 6 months was significantly associated with increased DM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, P = 0.015) and BF (HR 1.5, P = 0.018). “We did not find a significant association in the PSADT 6- to 12-month group,” notes Dr. Campbell. “The faster a patient’s PSA doubling time, the more likely they are to experience recurrence after SRT.”

The team also noted a significant association between an initial postoperative PSA of ≥ 0.5 ng/mL and risk of BF, when compared with a postoperative PSA of < 0.2 ng/mL (HR 1.4, P = 0.046).

“Our results confirm our previous finding that early SRT at lower pre-SRT levels improves rates of recurrence,” says Dr. Campbell. “Incorporating PSA kinetics allows us a more precise look at potential outcomes.”

Calculating patients’ results

Patients with prostate cancer are a heterogenous group, making mortality and outcomes prediction complex for physicians to calculate and share.

“Our nomogram update adds an important tool in the physician-patient discussion, because it takes 12 individual characteristics into consideration, so it’s quite personalized,” says Dr. Campbell. “Patients with this disease are very interested in long-term outcome estimates, and we want to offer them the best answers possible with this 10- and 15-year prediction.”

Advertisement

A preview of the nomogram was presented at ASTRO, and the team is developing an online calculator built from the nomogram that will be available to providers and patients within the next year.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Timothy Gilligan
April 27, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Getting Tough Conversations Right in Cancer Care

Reflections from an oncology provider and communications educator on new ASCO Guidelines on Patient-Clinician Communication

p53 mutation illustration
April 22, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Study Holds Promise for Targeting Elusive P53 Gene Mutation

Phase 1 trial outcomes offer encouraging news for developing targeted therapy for solid tumors

Synovial sarcoma cells
April 20, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

T-Cell Receptor Therapy Available for Segment of Population with Synovia Sarcoma

Cleveland Clinic to administer first-of-its-kind T-cell therapy

Dr. Jagadeesh and patient
April 14, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Bispecific Antibody Shows Deep Remission in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Heavily pretreated patients experience improved progression-free survival and quality of life with CD20xCD3 therapy

Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy

Case Study: Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Bilateral Mastectomy Improves Outcomes

Innovative procedure reduces scarring, recovery time and nipple sensation

Doctor comforting patient
April 1, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

What Gets in the Way of End-of-Life Care Discussions?

Best practices for supporting patients with honesty and compassion

Hospice nurse with patient
March 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Centering End-of-Life Care Around What Matters Most

Goal-of-care discussions drive earlier hospice access

Dr. Lauren Kopicky headshot
March 4, 2026/Cancer/Podcast

Rethinking Axillary Management in Breast Cancer (Podcast)

Clinical trials and de-escalation strategies

Ad