Locations:
Search IconSearch

Preoperative Group Education and Perceptions of Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy

Increased preparedness improves patient expectations of postoperative sexual function

650×450-Prostate-GettyImages-580120508_New Header_17-URL-680

Men who reported good preoperative understanding of their prospects for recovering sexual function after radical prostatectomy had more accurate expectations of their recovery and reported better sexual function outcomes than men who did not demonstrate good understanding, according to results of a Cleveland Clinic study presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The more prepared a man was before undergoing prostatectomy, the more likely he was to report his recovery was going as expected,” says Bradley C. Gill, MD, MS, study author and staff in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute.

Two hundred and ten men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled in a preoperative group education seminar led by advance practice providers. The session covered the expected postoperative course, including the probability of erectile dysfunction and expectations for recovery of erections. Patients were asked to complete surveys about their expectations and understanding at baseline, and interviewed by telephone at three weeks, three months, six months and one year.

Variance in subjective and objective measures

Of 147 men with intact erectile function at baseline, 62.6% (92) completed a survey at three weeks, 46.9% (69) at three months, 32.7% (48) at six months and 24.5% (36) at one year after surgery. Partial or full erections increased from 20.7% at three weeks to 58.3% at one year. However, patient-reported satisfaction with erections (defined as erections that were “as expected” or better) decreased from 56.8% at three weeks to 11.8% at one year. Dr. Gill suggests that the difference between the subjective and objective measures of erectile function “shows men coming to the realization that they may have reached their peak recovery and perhaps that they didn’t recover as much function as they hoped they would.”

When the group was divided into those who had good understanding preoperatively and those who didn’t despite going to the educational seminar, those in the former category were more likely to report that their erections were “as expected” or better after surgery than those in the latter category (52.5% versus 0% at three months [P = 0.006] and 45.2% versus 0% at six months [P = 0.003]). Not surprisingly, among men who did not experience any recovery of erectile function, the proportion who said their erections were “as expected” was reduced from 48.5% at three weeks to 0% at one year (P < 0.05).

Advertisement

“Although we did not have a control group in this study, by identifying the men who were more prepared for surgery and comparing them with those who were less prepared, we were able to determine the impact of preparedness between these two groups — and the bottom line was that better preparedness led to more accurate expectations and greater patient satisfaction,” says Dr. Gill.

Recovery prep is key

“We counsel all men considering radical prostatectomy that the amount of erectile function recovery they’ll achieve is dependent in large part on the amount of function they have going into surgery and the extent of their cancer,” explains Dr. Gill. “Obviously, if they have more advanced cancer that requires wider resection and removal of nerves that produce erections, they’re more likely to have impaired recovery erectile function after surgery.” The surgeons also explain that the majority of recovery will occur during the first 12 months after surgery, although recent evidence shows improvements in erections can continue to occur up until 18 months. “This suggests we need to both prepare men well for the surgery and counsel them to be patient during their recovery,” Dr. Gill concludes.

Advertisement

Related Articles

CT scan of female patient bladder cancer
November 26, 2024/Urology & Nephrology/Urology
Use of Interim Imaging To Preserve Eligibility for Vaginal-Sparing Cystectomy

Retrospective study evaluates clinical upstaging during neoadjuvant treatment

Microscopic view of bladder cancer with variant histology
November 19, 2024/Urology & Nephrology/Urology
Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer With Variant Histology: When To Consider a Bladder-Sparing Approach

Retrospective study finds acceptable cancer control among most histologic subtypes with intravesical therapy

Single-port robot docked in the operating room
November 12, 2024/Urology & Nephrology/Urology
Single-Port Pyeloplasty in a Pediatric Patient: A Novel Surgical Technique

Revolutionizing pediatric urology with a new, less invasive approach

Physician smiles at patient in a preoperative setting
September 12, 2024/Urology & Nephrology/Urology
Improving the Bladder Cancer Survivorship Experience for Women

What updated techniques, counseling and a changing workforce could mean

Surgeons in the operating room with the single-port robot
Novel Single-Port Robotic Urology Surgery Surpasses 1,000 Cases

Applications, outcomes and untapped potential

Photo of Dr. Bajic
Counseling Your Patients on SGLT-2 Inhibitors and Adverse Urologic Outcomes

Retrospective study shows SGLT-2 inhibitors may lead to worse urologic outcomes

Illustration of red blood cells in motion
Review Underscores Impact of Red Blood Cell Disorders on Male Reproduction

Early, individualized diagnosis and comprehensive management key to preserving fertility

UTI bacteria and artificial intelligence
AI Algorithms Accurately Predict Antibiotic Resistance in UTI

Up to 3 days faster than waiting for urine culture results

Ad