Locations:
Search IconSearch
February 6, 2017/Cancer/Research

Promise of PARP Inhibitors for BRCA1/BRCA2 Cancers

Clinical trials testing olaparib in breast cancer

BRCA1

Update: The FDA approved olaparib for patients with BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative breast cancer in January 2018.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

For patients with triple-negative breast cancer and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, current treatment options may at times be limited; currently, there are no specific treatments for BRCA1/BRCA2-mutated cancers that address the genetic defects seen in these cancers. However, there is growing interest in the use of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in this setting.

Promise of PARP inhibition in BRCA-mutated disease

“In patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, PARP inhibitors are one of the most promising treatments to be tested recently in clinical trials,” says Jame Abraham, MD, Director of Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center’s Medical Breast Oncology Program and Co-Director of the Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program.

PARP inhibitors interfere with base excision repair and therefore DNA repair, to effect death of tumor cells. PARP inhibitors can be highly lethal to tumor cells in patients who already have impaired DNA repair from BRCA mutation, Dr. Abraham says.

Although triple-negative breast cancer can be sporadic, these cancers share traits that involve DNA repair defects with those occurring in BRCA-mutated carriers. Eighty percent of hereditary BRCA-mutated cancers share the triple-negative breast cancer phenotype. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in triple-negative breast cancer ranges from 4 to 14.3 percent, and an additional 27 to 37 percent have somatic inactivation of BRCA1.

As a class, PARP inhibitors can cause profound damage to cancer cells in breast cancers that involve DNA repair pathway defects. A number of PARP inhibitors are undergoing clinical development, but none is yet FDA-approved for breast cancer.

Advertisement

OlympiAD and OlympiA: Clinical trial experience with olaparib

Cleveland Clinic is currently participating in two phase III clinical trials evaluating olaparib as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer as well as for stage II/III BRCA1/BRCA2, HER2-negative and triple-negative disease.

OlympiAD, the phase III trial on olaparib in metastatic breast cancer is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants and results are expected soon. In the meantime, Cleveland Clinic is enrolling patients in the OlympiA study, a phase III trial with olaparib as an adjuvant treatment for earlier-stage breast cancers with DNA repair defects — that is, in women with stage II and stage III breast cancer who have completed local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

“We have enough evidence from metastatic breast cancer trials to know that olaparib is active in stage IV breast cancer. So now we want to see what kind of benefit stage II/III breast cancer patients will derive from use of olaparib,” Dr. Abraham says.

Olaparib was the first PARP inhibitor approved by both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency for patients with BRCA1/2 mutant ovarian cancer. In 2014, the FDA approved olaparib for patients with germline BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer who have undergone three or more lines of chemotherapy. The treatment was approved along with the BRACAnalysis CDx, a companion diagnostic test.

In the same year, the European Medicines Agency approved olaparib as maintenance treatment for patients with relapsed BRCA-mutated, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who have responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. In clinical studies, among the most common adverse reactions with olaparib were anemia, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, dyspepsia and headache. In addition, myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia have occurred in patients exposed to olaparib.

Advertisement

Olaparib in the adjuvant setting after definitive treatment

The new phase III trial on olaparib is enrolling patients with stage II and stage III breast cancer who underwent initial surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. To be included, patients in this trial must either have triple-negative breast cancer (ER and PgR negative and HER2 negative; not eligible for anti-HER2 therapy) or ER and/or PgR positive, HER2 negative.

The randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study will test a dose of 300 mg of olaparib administered twice daily for 12 months, while the control group will receive a matching placebo. The primary outcome is invasive disease-free survival, up to 10 years. Assessments will also include overall survival; distant disease-free survival; and the incidence of new primary contralateral breast cancers, new primary ovarian cancers, new primary fallopian cancers and new primary peritoneal cancers. Secondary outcomes also include patient-reported outcomes using the FACIT-Fatigue and EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life questionnaires.

At baseline, gene sequencing will be used to identify patients who have BRCA mutations. During the trial, patient exposure to olaparib (in plasma) will be monitored in those women receiving the medication as adjuvant therapy. Safety and tolerability of olaparib will also be assessed in the trial.

“This newest phase III clinical trial on olaparib in women with stage II/stage III breast cancer will give us an idea of the efficacy of olaparib in earlier-stage cancers,” Dr. Abraham says. “This is a very good trial for investigating a potentially promising adjuvant therapy for women with BRCA1/BRCA2 and HER2-negative breast cancer in the earlier stages of their disease.”

Advertisement

He notes that no PARP inhibitor is yet FDA-approved for breast cancer and that other PARP inhibitors — veliparib and niraparib — are also going through clinical trials right now. (Update: The FDA approved olaparib for patients with BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative breast cancer in January 2018.)

Photo Credit: ©Russell Lee

Advertisement

Related Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Acupuncture in wrist
May 29, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Can Acupuncture Really Help with Cancer Treatment Side Effects?

Evidence-based recommendations for managing pain, nausea and other treatment reactions

Head and neck cancer illustration
May 28, 2026/Cancer

What Is the Outlook for Treatment De-Intensification Strategies for Head & Neck Cancer?

Emerging data and practice changes reduce toxicity burden of treatment

Ad