Locations:
Search IconSearch
June 2, 2018/Cancer/Research

T-DM1 + Neratinib’s Safety and Efficacy in Women with Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer

Phase 1b trial shows good response rate

breast cancer metastases

Despite improvements in surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, 40,000 women still die each year from breast cancer, many from its most aggressive form, HER2+ breast cancer.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Results of a phase 1b study demonstrate that a new drug combination offers a promising regimen to attack HER2, a protein that promotes the growth of cancer cells.

“About 25 percent of breast cancers are HER2+, and they tend to be more aggressive,” says Jame Abraham, MD, Director of the Breast Medical Oncology Program at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. “Fortunately, in the past 10 to 15 years, we have developed several new treatment options for HER2+ breast cancer that specifically target the HER2 protein. One is trastuzumab emtansine, T-DM1. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to it.”

Dr. Abraham is the principal investigator of a multi-institutional phase 1b clinical trial sponsored by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). The trial, called NSABP FB-10, combines T-DM1 and neratinib to treat women with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer who relapsed or progressed after trastuzumab– and pertuzumab-containing regimens. Dr. Abraham recently presented data from the trial at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting.

“Neratinib was recently approved for treatment in early HER2+ breast cancer but not metastatic breast cancer,” he says. “This particular trial is testing this drug in combination with T-DM1 in women who have HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.”

Trial characteristics

In the trial, patients received concurrent therapy with T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and neratinib as a continuous daily oral dose. The neratinib dose-escalation included four dose levels — 120 mg, 160 mg, 200 mg and 240 mg — and used a 3+3 design.

Advertisement

Twenty-four patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 20 were evaluable for efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in six patients during cycle one. Treatment-related grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (five patients), thrombocytopenia (four patients) and ALT elevation (one patient).

The duration of the response lasted from 42 days to over 600 days. There was not a correlation of dose and peak or steady-state levels; responses were seen at all doses.

High response rate

Overall the combination of full-dose T-DM1 and neratinib at 160 mg/d was well tolerated. The overall response rate was 64 percent, with four patients experiencing a complete response (CR) and nine experiencing a partial response (PR). (Updated data from the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium show a 63 percent response, with three patients experiencing CR and nine PR.)

“That’s actually pretty high, and we’re really happy with that,” Dr. Abraham says. “We have some patients going on almost two years on this regimen.”

A phase 2 trial to further test the safety and effectiveness of the drug combination is already started. Depending on the results, Dr. Abraham says, a phase 3 trial may compare patients treated with T-DM1 versus those treated with T-DM1 and neratinib.

Image: Nanoparticles in breast cancer metastases. Image source: National Cancer Institute/Case Western Reserve University

Advertisement

Related Articles

Male patient with doctor
June 17, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Overcoming Taboos: Helping Men with Cancer Restore Sexual Health

Creating a safe space for patients

Masked patient with physician
June 15, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Managing Infection Risk in the Era of Cell Therapy

Long-term immune effects reshape preventative strategies and timelines

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Ad