Locations:
June 5, 2017/Cancer/Research

Trial Finds Maximum Tolerable Dose for Combination Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

Axitinib and crizotinib stabilized disease in most

Dale Shepard, MD

A phase 1b clinical trial made up of a majority of Cleveland Clinic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) identified the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) for effective combination therapy using axitinib (AX) and crizotinib (CZ).

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Both drugs are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). AX is a TKI of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and CZ is a TKI of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET).

The study — which was accepted for presentation at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago — is ongoing.

Two drugs, two separate pathways

AX, which works by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels by cancer tumors, is standard treatment for mRCC, but patients typically develop resistance to it over time. Researchers involved in this trial wondered if combining it with CZ, which inhibits the c-MET pathway, a signaling route that when aberrantly activated can lead to the development of certain cancers, might overcome that resistance.

“Essentially we’re trying to come up with a better therapy by combining two drugs that work on two separate pathways,” says Dale Shepard, MD, PhD, Director of the Taussig Cancer Institute phase 1 clinical trials and sarcoma programs. “The thought is, if you just work on one pathway, the cell finds a way to get around that. If you block both, you might get a better response.”

Dose escalation phase finds tolerable, safe side effects

During the dose-escalation phase of the trial, 22 patients were treated with increased dosages:

  • Five patients on AX 3 mg twice daily + CZ 200 mg twice daily
  • Three patients on AX 3 mg twice daily + CZ 250 mg twice daily
  • Four patients on AX 5 mg twice daily + CZ 200 mg twice daily
  • Ten patients on AX 5 mg twice daily + CZ 250 mg twice daily

Patients received between one and 23 cycles of the drugs, with an average of four cycles. The majority, 68 percent, experienced some adverse effects — fatigue, nausea and diarrhea — but nothing life-threatening. One patient died due to disease progression.

Advertisement

“Those [side effects] are the standard toxicities that you would expect from these drugs independently,” says Dr. Shepard. “We got all the way with the highest dose, which is the standard dose for each drug, and we did not have any dose-limiting toxicities along the way. Essentially, this combination is very safe.”

Dose expansion phase shows combination exhibits anti-tumor effect

In the second phase, which is ongoing, Dr. Shepard and his colleagues divided patients into two cohorts: those with mRCC who were treatment naive and those with mRCC who had received one to two prior treatments.

So far, 15 patients — 11 in the first cohort and four in the second — have been treated with the MTD of AX 5 mg twice daily and CZ 250 mg twice daily. There has been one complete response (CR), three partial responses (PR) and four stable disease (SD) in 10 evaluable patients in the first cohort and one PR and two SD in the second cohort. Overall, 67 percent experienced side effects, most often nausea and diarrhea, and one patient died due to disease progression.

“That’s a pretty good response,” Dr. Shepard says. “Of those that were not previously treated, eight out of 10 had stable disease or better. In patients with mRCC, you can’t cure them, but if you can have people on a therapy that is keeping their disease from growing and they’re tolerating it well, that’s success.”

He cautioned that because the trial is not completed no firm conclusions can be drawn, but added that the fact that one patient had a CR indicates that combination therapies should not be ignored. “If you have a combination where you can get a complete response, you start thinking about the dual-pathway inhibitors and whether there are other pathways that could be inhibited.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Arun Singh
October 21, 2026/Cancer

Preserving Vision in Uveal Melanoma (Podcast)

Understanding expanding treatment options and potential advances

Patient and doctor
October 9, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

First Radioligand Therapy Approved for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Adding 177Lu-PSMA-617 to ADT plus an ARPI cut the risk of radiographic progression or mortality by 28%

Woman running
October 7, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Pilot Project Aids Cancer Survivors in Achieving Healthy Weight and Reducing Recurrent Risk

New program will help patients improve fitness and manage weight after cancer treatment

Dr Keith McCrae
October 6, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

How is ITP Therapy Evolving?

Cleveland Clinic hematologist highlights new guidelines and treatment advances in immune thrombocytopenia

Bone metastasis
October 5, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Digital Platform Cuts Bone Metastasis Treatment Decision Time

NIMBLE replaces weekly tumor board delays with same-day multidisciplinary recommendations

Prostate cancer
October 2, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

ArteraAI Prostate Biomarker Accurate Across Diverse Populations

Cleveland Clinic study provides validation for the test, which combines AI and pathological data to predict outcomes in postoperative patients

Prostate cancer illustration
October 1, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

PSMA PET Scan-Guided LDR Brachytherapy Can Control Localized Prostate Cancer Recurrence

Advanced imaging technology catches metastases much earlier, allowing treatment with fewer side effects

Throat cancer
September 30, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Same Cure Rate, Less Radiation in HPV-Associated Oral Cancer

Reduced radiation for lymph node areas reduces side effects

Ad