Locations:
September 25, 2018/Cancer/Research

Try Ruxolitinib Again When Effectiveness Wanes in Myelofibrosis

Second (or third) time’s a charm in reducing splenomegaly and other symptoms

Spleen_650x450

“If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.” That old proverb is the newfound wisdom surrounding ruxolitinib use in patients with myelofibrosis (MF).

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

A recent study in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia demonstrates that resuming use of the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, after ceasing use when it lost effectiveness, can reactivate a response, reducing both splenomegaly (enlarged spleen) and constitutional symptoms.

This is encouraging because these complications of MF can be severe and negatively impact a patient’s quality of life. Splenomegaly can cause abdominal, chest or back pain; early satiety and bloating. Constitutional symptoms can include weight loss, fever and night sweats.

“COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II were landmark trials that showed ruxolitinib’s clinical benefits in reducing spleen size and improving constitutional symptoms,” says the new study’s first author Aaron T. Gerds, MD, MS, of Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology. “But those trials didn’t establish a treatment for when patients progress on ruxolitinib.”

Progression is marked by a 25 percent or greater increase in spleen volume or leukemic transformation.

“To date there is only one FDA-approved medication, and still no approved treatment for patients whose disease progresses or who stop using ruxolitinib due to toxicities,” says Dr. Gerds. “But anecdotally in clinic — and backed up by preclinical models — we’ve seen that patients may derive benefit after a rechallenge.”

That’s what inspired Dr. Gerds and fellow researchers at Cleveland Clinic and the University of Southern California to conduct a retrospective study.

Up for a rechallenge

Researchers reviewed the cases of 13 patients (median age 71) with MF who were retreated with ruxolitinib at least once between 2012 and 2017. All patients had received 5-25 mg of the drug twice daily for a median of 62 weeks.

Advertisement

During the patients’ first course of ruxolitinib, they had shown initial improvement in constitutional symptoms and reduced spleen size. But then improvements waned or toxicity became intolerable, and they stopped taking the drug.

After one week or longer, patients were re-exposed to ruxolitinib (at any dosage) for at least two weeks.

Based on electronic medical record data, researchers recorded each patient’s:

  • Duration of therapy.
  • Dosage at initiation and cessation.
  • Spleen length at initiation and cessation.
  • Reason for discontinuation — including loss of response or inadequate response, change to alternate therapy, and intolerable toxicity.

They found that after retreatment with ruxolitinib:

  • Spleen size reduced significantly — a mean of 7.1 cm — in nine of the 13 patients (69 percent). Compare that to the initial treatment, when spleen size reduced a mean of 10.9 cm.
  • Constitutional symptoms improved in 12 of the 13 patients (92 percent).

Four patients that stopped taking ruxolitinib a second time due to diminishing response began taking it a third time. All four again reported improvement in spleen size and symptoms.

When the study was published in June 2018, six of the 13 patients were continuing to have a favorable response from their second or third course of ruxolitinib.

What this means to clinicians

“Other case series have found similar results — that retreatment with ruxolitinib can successfully reduce spleen size and other symptoms when it didn’t the first or even second time,” says Dr. Gerds.

Yes, this recent study was retrospective, the sample size small, and the cause of resensitization uncertain, but it can happen, he says. In some cases, the response to intermittent treatment is durable.

Advertisement

More research is needed to confirm these findings, but results suggest that retreatment with ruxolitinib is safe and potentially effective for MF patients without other standard therapy options.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Arun Singh
October 21, 2026/Cancer

Preserving Vision in Uveal Melanoma (Podcast)

Understanding expanding treatment options and potential advances

Patient and doctor
October 9, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

First Radioligand Therapy Approved for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Adding 177Lu-PSMA-617 to ADT plus an ARPI cut the risk of radiographic progression or mortality by 28%

Woman running
October 7, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Pilot Project Aids Cancer Survivors in Achieving Healthy Weight and Reducing Recurrent Risk

New program will help patients improve fitness and manage weight after cancer treatment

Dr Keith McCrae
October 6, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

How is ITP Therapy Evolving?

Cleveland Clinic hematologist highlights new guidelines and treatment advances in immune thrombocytopenia

Bone metastasis
October 5, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Digital Platform Cuts Bone Metastasis Treatment Decision Time

NIMBLE replaces weekly tumor board delays with same-day multidisciplinary recommendations

Prostate cancer
October 2, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

ArteraAI Prostate Biomarker Accurate Across Diverse Populations

Cleveland Clinic study provides validation for the test, which combines AI and pathological data to predict outcomes in postoperative patients

Prostate cancer illustration
October 1, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

PSMA PET Scan-Guided LDR Brachytherapy Can Control Localized Prostate Cancer Recurrence

Advanced imaging technology catches metastases much earlier, allowing treatment with fewer side effects

Throat cancer
September 30, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Same Cure Rate, Less Radiation in HPV-Associated Oral Cancer

Reduced radiation for lymph node areas reduces side effects

Ad