Locations:
Search IconSearch
March 24, 2021/Cancer/Research

Venous Thromboembolism Common in Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

An underappreciated immune-related adverse event

Nivolumab

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 25% of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy, according to a Cleveland Clinic study published recently in Med. Researchers also identified potential biomarkers that can assist in stratifying patients’ risk of VTE when treated with immunotherapy.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The impact of immunotherapy on cancer prognosis for many patients cannot be understated,” says Keith R. McCrae, MD, Director of Benign Hematology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and coauthor of the study, “but neither can the potential for and prevalence of immune-related adverse events. Our results show that VTE should be considered a common toxicity of cancer immunotherapy.”

The study was part of a $4.7 million grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and led by Dr. McCrae and Alok Khorana, MD, to study the prevention of life-threatening, cancer-associated thrombosis.

Study design and results

This retrospective cohort study included 1,686 patients who were treated with immunotherapy for various malignancies. The mean age was 64.5 years, and most patients were male (60.1%), white (86.8%) and non-Hispanic (96.4%) with metastatic disease (90.3%). Both the incidence and impact on mortality of VTE were tracked.

Nivolumab was the most commonly used therapy, followed by pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, avelumab and durvalumab. VTE occurred during immunotherapy in 24% of patients and was associated with a significant decrease in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.41, P < 0.008). Researchers found no significant difference in rate of VTE among the therapies.

“This was interesting because the majority of malignancies represented in our cohort were not ones normally associated with VTE, like pancreatic cancer,” says Dr. McCrae. “This further suggests a role for the treatment in the development of VTE, rather than the malignancy itself.”

Advertisement

Previous evidence has implied a potential role for cellular immune response, inflammatory cytokine and compliment-mediated inflammation playing a role in the various immune-related adverse events patients can experience after immunotherapy. Researchers analyzed blood samples taken before the start of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients for 51 plasma cytokines and chemokines associated with inflammation. Those who developed VTE (N = 15) had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.0045), soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (P = 0.0385) and interleukin 8 (P = 0.016) than patients who did not develop VTE (N = 10).

VTE a continued concern despite therapeutic advancements

The work of Dr. Khorana, Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research and Vice-Chair for Faculty Development at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, and senior author of the study, previously established the association of VTE with standard cancer therapies. “In this study, we built upon this work to show that the risk continues for our cancer patients, despite advances in therapy,” he says. “This study is also the first to identify potential biomarkers that can help us determine thrombotic risk in patients treated with immunotherapy.”

The CASSINI and AVERT trials demonstrated that prophylactic anticoagulation can prevent VTE in patients with cancer; if data from the present study can be replicated, and safety can be established, prophylactic anticoagulation may also become standard for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

Advertisement

“This preliminary study opens the door for further exploration of the connection between immunotherapy and VTE,” notes Dr. McCrae. “If we can predict and then prevent this adverse event in patients receiving immunotherapy, we can reduce morbidity and mortality and provide better overall care for our patients, which is always the goal.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Jack Khouri with patient

A Call to Increase Awareness About AL Amyloidosis

New guidelines empower clinicians with practical diagnostic framework

Dr. Shilpa Gupta and patient
April 30, 2026/Cancer/Tumor Oncology

Bladder Cancer Treatment Takes Key Steps Forward

Pivotal Studies Guide Treatment Decisions in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Dr. Timothy Gilligan
April 27, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Getting Tough Conversations Right in Cancer Care

Reflections from an oncology provider and communications educator on new ASCO Guidelines on Patient-Clinician Communication

p53 mutation illustration
April 22, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Study Holds Promise for Targeting Elusive P53 Gene Mutation

Phase 1 trial outcomes offer encouraging news for developing targeted therapy for solid tumors

Synovial sarcoma cells
April 20, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

T-Cell Receptor Therapy Available for Segment of Population with Synovia Sarcoma

Cleveland Clinic to administer first-of-its-kind T-cell therapy

Dr. Jagadeesh and patient
April 14, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Bispecific Antibody Shows Deep Remission in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Heavily pretreated patients experience improved progression-free survival and quality of life with CD20xCD3 therapy

Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy

Case Study: Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Bilateral Mastectomy Improves Outcomes

Innovative procedure reduces scarring, recovery time and nipple sensation

Doctor comforting patient
April 1, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

What Gets in the Way of End-of-Life Care Discussions?

Best practices for supporting patients with honesty and compassion

Ad