Locations:
March 24, 2021/Cancer/Research

Venous Thromboembolism Common in Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

An underappreciated immune-related adverse event

Nivolumab

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 25% of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy, according to a Cleveland Clinic study published recently in Med. Researchers also identified potential biomarkers that can assist in stratifying patients’ risk of VTE when treated with immunotherapy.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The impact of immunotherapy on cancer prognosis for many patients cannot be understated,” says Keith R. McCrae, MD, Director of Benign Hematology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and coauthor of the study, “but neither can the potential for and prevalence of immune-related adverse events. Our results show that VTE should be considered a common toxicity of cancer immunotherapy.”

The study was part of a $4.7 million grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and led by Dr. McCrae and Alok Khorana, MD, to study the prevention of life-threatening, cancer-associated thrombosis.

Study design and results

This retrospective cohort study included 1,686 patients who were treated with immunotherapy for various malignancies. The mean age was 64.5 years, and most patients were male (60.1%), white (86.8%) and non-Hispanic (96.4%) with metastatic disease (90.3%). Both the incidence and impact on mortality of VTE were tracked.

Nivolumab was the most commonly used therapy, followed by pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, avelumab and durvalumab. VTE occurred during immunotherapy in 24% of patients and was associated with a significant decrease in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.41, P < 0.008). Researchers found no significant difference in rate of VTE among the therapies.

“This was interesting because the majority of malignancies represented in our cohort were not ones normally associated with VTE, like pancreatic cancer,” says Dr. McCrae. “This further suggests a role for the treatment in the development of VTE, rather than the malignancy itself.”

Advertisement

Previous evidence has implied a potential role for cellular immune response, inflammatory cytokine and compliment-mediated inflammation playing a role in the various immune-related adverse events patients can experience after immunotherapy. Researchers analyzed blood samples taken before the start of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients for 51 plasma cytokines and chemokines associated with inflammation. Those who developed VTE (N = 15) had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.0045), soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (P = 0.0385) and interleukin 8 (P = 0.016) than patients who did not develop VTE (N = 10).

VTE a continued concern despite therapeutic advancements

The work of Dr. Khorana, Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research and Vice-Chair for Faculty Development at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, and senior author of the study, previously established the association of VTE with standard cancer therapies. “In this study, we built upon this work to show that the risk continues for our cancer patients, despite advances in therapy,” he says. “This study is also the first to identify potential biomarkers that can help us determine thrombotic risk in patients treated with immunotherapy.”

The CASSINI and AVERT trials demonstrated that prophylactic anticoagulation can prevent VTE in patients with cancer; if data from the present study can be replicated, and safety can be established, prophylactic anticoagulation may also become standard for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

Advertisement

“This preliminary study opens the door for further exploration of the connection between immunotherapy and VTE,” notes Dr. McCrae. “If we can predict and then prevent this adverse event in patients receiving immunotherapy, we can reduce morbidity and mortality and provide better overall care for our patients, which is always the goal.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Patient and doctor
October 9, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

First Radioligand Therapy Approved for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Adding 177Lu-PSMA-617 to ADT plus an ARPI cut the risk of radiographic progression or mortality by 28%

Woman running
October 7, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Pilot Project Aids Cancer Survivors in Achieving Healthy Weight and Reducing Recurrent Risk

New program will help patients improve fitness and manage weight after cancer treatment

Dr Keith McCrae
October 6, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

How is ITP Therapy Evolving?

Cleveland Clinic hematologist highlights new guidelines and treatment advances in immune thrombocytopenia

Bone metastasis
October 5, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Digital Platform Cuts Bone Metastasis Treatment Decision Time

NIMBLE replaces weekly tumor board delays with same-day multidisciplinary recommendations

Prostate cancer
October 2, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

ArteraAI Prostate Biomarker Accurate Across Diverse Populations

Cleveland Clinic study provides validation for the test, which combines AI and pathological data to predict outcomes in postoperative patients

Prostate cancer illustration
October 1, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

PSMA PET Scan-Guided LDR Brachytherapy Can Control Localized Prostate Cancer Recurrence

Advanced imaging technology catches metastases much earlier, allowing treatment with fewer side effects

Throat cancer
September 30, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Same Cure Rate, Less Radiation in HPV-Associated Oral Cancer

Reduced radiation for lymph node areas reduces side effects

Lung cancer illustration
September 29, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Single-Fraction SBRT Shows Comparable Outcomes to Three-Fraction Approach in Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Large Cleveland Clinic analysis may help resolve a longstanding question over optimal fractionation

Ad