Locations:
Search IconSearch
March 24, 2021/Cancer/Research

Venous Thromboembolism Common in Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

An underappreciated immune-related adverse event

Nivolumab

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 25% of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy, according to a Cleveland Clinic study published recently in Med. Researchers also identified potential biomarkers that can assist in stratifying patients’ risk of VTE when treated with immunotherapy.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The impact of immunotherapy on cancer prognosis for many patients cannot be understated,” says Keith R. McCrae, MD, Director of Benign Hematology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and coauthor of the study, “but neither can the potential for and prevalence of immune-related adverse events. Our results show that VTE should be considered a common toxicity of cancer immunotherapy.”

The study was part of a $4.7 million grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and led by Dr. McCrae and Alok Khorana, MD, to study the prevention of life-threatening, cancer-associated thrombosis.

Study design and results

This retrospective cohort study included 1,686 patients who were treated with immunotherapy for various malignancies. The mean age was 64.5 years, and most patients were male (60.1%), white (86.8%) and non-Hispanic (96.4%) with metastatic disease (90.3%). Both the incidence and impact on mortality of VTE were tracked.

Nivolumab was the most commonly used therapy, followed by pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, avelumab and durvalumab. VTE occurred during immunotherapy in 24% of patients and was associated with a significant decrease in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.41, P < 0.008). Researchers found no significant difference in rate of VTE among the therapies.

“This was interesting because the majority of malignancies represented in our cohort were not ones normally associated with VTE, like pancreatic cancer,” says Dr. McCrae. “This further suggests a role for the treatment in the development of VTE, rather than the malignancy itself.”

Advertisement

Previous evidence has implied a potential role for cellular immune response, inflammatory cytokine and compliment-mediated inflammation playing a role in the various immune-related adverse events patients can experience after immunotherapy. Researchers analyzed blood samples taken before the start of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients for 51 plasma cytokines and chemokines associated with inflammation. Those who developed VTE (N = 15) had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.0045), soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (P = 0.0385) and interleukin 8 (P = 0.016) than patients who did not develop VTE (N = 10).

VTE a continued concern despite therapeutic advancements

The work of Dr. Khorana, Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research and Vice-Chair for Faculty Development at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, and senior author of the study, previously established the association of VTE with standard cancer therapies. “In this study, we built upon this work to show that the risk continues for our cancer patients, despite advances in therapy,” he says. “This study is also the first to identify potential biomarkers that can help us determine thrombotic risk in patients treated with immunotherapy.”

The CASSINI and AVERT trials demonstrated that prophylactic anticoagulation can prevent VTE in patients with cancer; if data from the present study can be replicated, and safety can be established, prophylactic anticoagulation may also become standard for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

Advertisement

“This preliminary study opens the door for further exploration of the connection between immunotherapy and VTE,” notes Dr. McCrae. “If we can predict and then prevent this adverse event in patients receiving immunotherapy, we can reduce morbidity and mortality and provide better overall care for our patients, which is always the goal.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Physician checking patient's heart rate
July 15, 2026/Cancer

First-Generation BTK Inhibitors Associated with Higher Risk of Cardiac Events

Patients on ibrutinib were more than twice as likely to experience atrial fibrillation or heart failure than those on second-generation alternatives.

Thyroid cancer illustration
July 13, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

New ASCO Guidelines Help Clinicians Navigate Rapid Shifts in Thyroid Cancer Treatment

Expert recommendations introduce use of targeted agents

AML cells in blood flow
July 10, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Ziftomenib + Chemotherapy Drives Deep Remission in Frontline NPM1-m/KMT2A-r AML

Combination therapy may soon represent new standard of care

Researcher with microscope
June 26, 2026/Cancer

Testosterone May Offer Anti-Tumor Activity in Glioblastoma

Research findings offer clues for improving disease outcomes in men

Male patient with doctor
June 17, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Overcoming Taboos: Helping Men with Cancer Restore Sexual Health

Creating a safe space for patients

Masked patient with physician
June 15, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Managing Infection Risk in the Era of Cell Therapy

Long-term immune effects reshape preventative strategies and timelines

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Ad