Locations:
Search IconSearch
March 24, 2021/Cancer/Research

Venous Thromboembolism Common in Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

An underappreciated immune-related adverse event

Nivolumab

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 25% of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy, according to a Cleveland Clinic study published recently in Med. Researchers also identified potential biomarkers that can assist in stratifying patients’ risk of VTE when treated with immunotherapy.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“The impact of immunotherapy on cancer prognosis for many patients cannot be understated,” says Keith R. McCrae, MD, Director of Benign Hematology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center and coauthor of the study, “but neither can the potential for and prevalence of immune-related adverse events. Our results show that VTE should be considered a common toxicity of cancer immunotherapy.”

The study was part of a $4.7 million grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and led by Dr. McCrae and Alok Khorana, MD, to study the prevention of life-threatening, cancer-associated thrombosis.

Study design and results

This retrospective cohort study included 1,686 patients who were treated with immunotherapy for various malignancies. The mean age was 64.5 years, and most patients were male (60.1%), white (86.8%) and non-Hispanic (96.4%) with metastatic disease (90.3%). Both the incidence and impact on mortality of VTE were tracked.

Nivolumab was the most commonly used therapy, followed by pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, avelumab and durvalumab. VTE occurred during immunotherapy in 24% of patients and was associated with a significant decrease in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.41, P < 0.008). Researchers found no significant difference in rate of VTE among the therapies.

“This was interesting because the majority of malignancies represented in our cohort were not ones normally associated with VTE, like pancreatic cancer,” says Dr. McCrae. “This further suggests a role for the treatment in the development of VTE, rather than the malignancy itself.”

Advertisement

Previous evidence has implied a potential role for cellular immune response, inflammatory cytokine and compliment-mediated inflammation playing a role in the various immune-related adverse events patients can experience after immunotherapy. Researchers analyzed blood samples taken before the start of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients for 51 plasma cytokines and chemokines associated with inflammation. Those who developed VTE (N = 15) had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.0045), soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (P = 0.0385) and interleukin 8 (P = 0.016) than patients who did not develop VTE (N = 10).

VTE a continued concern despite therapeutic advancements

The work of Dr. Khorana, Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research and Vice-Chair for Faculty Development at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, and senior author of the study, previously established the association of VTE with standard cancer therapies. “In this study, we built upon this work to show that the risk continues for our cancer patients, despite advances in therapy,” he says. “This study is also the first to identify potential biomarkers that can help us determine thrombotic risk in patients treated with immunotherapy.”

The CASSINI and AVERT trials demonstrated that prophylactic anticoagulation can prevent VTE in patients with cancer; if data from the present study can be replicated, and safety can be established, prophylactic anticoagulation may also become standard for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

Advertisement

“This preliminary study opens the door for further exploration of the connection between immunotherapy and VTE,” notes Dr. McCrae. “If we can predict and then prevent this adverse event in patients receiving immunotherapy, we can reduce morbidity and mortality and provide better overall care for our patients, which is always the goal.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Patient with nebulizer
June 1, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Adding Novel Inhaled Agent May Improve Lung Cancer Outcomes

Direct delivery of viral-based vector KB707 to the lungs may boost anti-tumor response and help overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance

Acupuncture in wrist
May 29, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Can Acupuncture Really Help with Cancer Treatment Side Effects?

Evidence-based recommendations for managing pain, nausea and other treatment reactions

Head and neck cancer illustration
May 28, 2026/Cancer

What Is the Outlook for Treatment De-Intensification Strategies for Head & Neck Cancer?

Emerging data and practice changes reduce toxicity burden of treatment

Young patient with doctor
May 26, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Coming of Age with Cancer

Understanding supports for adolescent and young adult patients

Patient with nurse

Supporting our Patients Living with Cancer and Beyond

Reframing cancer survivorship

Ad