Check out our latest volume and outcomes data in these key areas
Below we share recent volumes and clinical outcomes from a sampling of centers in Cleveland Clinic’s Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Over the past 17 years, mortality for these operations at Cleveland Clinic has substantially trended downward even as volumes rise and case complexity increases.
Cleveland Clinic received the highest Composite Quality Rating (3 stars) for these operations in the latest STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database report*:
(vs. 1.4% STS predicted mortality)
(vs. 2.8% STS predicted mortality)
(no predicted rate available)
(vs. 3.8% STS predicted mortality)
(no predicted rate available)
(no predicted rate available)
Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute has a long-established tradition of reporting volume and outcomes data across its various subspecialty areas. For more information like the data reported above, visit clevelandclinic.org/hvtioutcomes and clevelandclinic.org/e15.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recent Cleveland Clinic experience reveals hundreds of cases with anatomic constraints to FEVAR
30-year study of Cleveland Clinic experience shows clear improvement from year 2000 onward
Launch of the tool promises to reshape quality assessment across the specialty
A scannable graphic recap of our latest data
Surgeons credit good outcomes to experience with complex cases and team approach
For many patients, repair is feasible, durable and preferred over replacement
In experienced hands, up to 95% of patients can be free of reoperation at 15 years
Experience and strength in both SAVR and TAVR make for the best patient options and outcomes