Locations:
Search IconSearch
January 14, 2022/Neurosciences/Epilepsy

Continuous EEG in Critically Ill Patients: Study Raises Reasons to Revisit Monitoring Duration

Consider 36-hour standard, with certain risk factors prompting longer or shorter windows

Medications in the ICU. Medicinal lines next to patient bed

It may be time to extend the standard time window for continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring among critically ill patients, suggests a large retrospective Cleveland Clinic study published in Epilepsia Open.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The study found that among critically ill patients undergoing cEEG monitoring, seizure detection increases linearly for the first 36 hours, with detection after that time more likely to occur in patients who are taking antiseizure medications or who have altered mental status, periodic epileptiform discharges or an acute brain insult.

“Based on the linear trend to 36 hours that we found for seizure detection in critically ill patients, we recommend extending the current cEEG monitoring standard of 24 hours,” says the study’s senior author Stephen Hantus, MD, Director of Continuous EEG and Epilepsy Consult Service at Cleveland Clinic. “And with this large study cohort, we were able to identify risk factors to justify longer — or shorter — monitoring durations.”

Current monitoring recommendations based on insufficient evidence

Nonconvulsive or subclinical seizures can be detected in up to about 20% of critically ill patients undergoing cEEG monitoring. While most such seizures can be detected within 24 hours of monitoring, others are delayed and therefore easily missed. Current recommendations are to monitor for up to 24 hours for most patients, and for at least 48 hours in patients who are comatose or have a history of seizures. This guidance is based on risk factors identified by other investigations of highly selected patient cohorts.

The current study was designed to identify any additional risk factors for delayed seizure detection by cEEG in a large and more varied patient population.

Study design and findings

The study cohort consisted of hospitalized adults who underwent cEEG at Cleveland Clinic during 2016. Of 2,402 patients, 316 (13.2%) had at least one nonclinical seizure. The mean age of the entire cohort was 59.4 ± 17.4 years (49.6% female), and the most common primary etiologies of presentation were toxic/metabolic/infectious encephalopathy, brain bleeds and ischemic strokes. The most common indication for monitoring was an observed seizure-like episode.

Advertisement

Timing of first nonclinical seizure detection by cEEG occurred at the following rates:

  • 4% within 24 hours
  • 6% between 24 and 48 hours
  • 0% after 48 hours

Cumulative seizure detection increased linearly for the first 36 hours of monitoring, after which the odds of seizure detection increased by 46% for each additional day of monitoring.

The following were identified as risk factors for delayed seizure detection (i.e., after 48 hours):

  • Stupor (patient unresponsive except with vigorous, repeated stimuli)
  • Lethargy (patient hypersomnolent but arousable with minimal stimulus)
  • Lateralized periodic discharges
  • Generalized periodic discharges
  • Acute brain insult (25.5%, P = 0.036)
  • Brain bleeds, especially multiple concomitant bleeds
  • Altered mental status as primary indication for cEEG
  • Use of antiseizure medications

Guidance for optimal monitoring duration

Dr. Hantus notes that a patient’s clinical presentation provides some of the most important indicators of optimal duration of cEEG monitoring. Patients who present with an acute brain insult, especially mixed bleeds, are at high risk of delayed seizure detection and need longer monitoring. Likewise, anyone with coma, stupor or lethargy is likelier than patients with awake mentation to need extended monitoring.

The study report outlines the following general guidelines for duration of cEEG monitoring.

Standard monitoring duration should be 36 hours. This is an increase from current published recommendations of up to 24 hours of cEEG for patients who are not comatose and without a seizure history. As 36 hours is the optimal duration among the entire study cohort regardless of risk factors, it is most relevant for patients for whom little clinical history information is available.

Advertisement

For certain patients, up to 24 hours of continuous monitoring is adequate. For awake patients without interictal epileptiform discharges, less than 24 hours monitoring should suffice. Also, although patients who have a witnessed seizure-like event are at high risk for having seizures during monitoring, these are usually detected within 24 hours.

Multiple situations warrant 48 hours of cEEG monitoring. These include:

  • Comatose, stuporous or lethargic state
  • Presence of lateralized or generalized periodic discharges
  • Presence of an acute brain insult of any type, with multiple concomitant bleeds posing the highest risk
  • Altered mental status as the primary indication for cEEG
  • Existing use of antiseizure medications

“Timely seizure detection with cEEG may reduce medical and neurological complications, and even in-hospital mortality,” concludes Dr. Hantus. “Findings from this study can help clinicians make decisions about optimal cEEG monitoring duration with increased confidence.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

illustration of lumbar spine with inset showing area of defect
April 23, 2026/Neurosciences/Spine Care

Two-Level Fusion Eases Complex Bertolotti Syndrome Disability

Study finds broadly similar outcomes between MIS and open surgical approaches

Woman helping older woman as she walks with a cane

New Model Performs Well Predicting Parkinson’s Sentinel Falls

System uses clinical data routinely collected at clinical visits

Portrait of Dr. Dani
April 17, 2026/Neurosciences/Podcast

Updated Brain-Death Guidelines Add Specificity (Podcast)

Newer protocols address testing, language and communication

screen showing EEG tracings from multiple patients
April 7, 2026/Neurosciences/Epilepsy

Harnessing AI to Bring Real-Time EEG Interpretation to the ICU

Collaboration with AI startup promises to reshape neurocritical care monitoring at scale

Physical therapist helping patient walk with a powered exoskeleton and walker

Exoskeleton-Aided Physical Therapy Proves Feasible in MS

Study looked at mobility measures and safety

portrait of Dr. Kriti Bhayana against decorative background with podcast overlay
April 2, 2026/Neurosciences/Podcast

Practice Essentials for Pediatric and Perinatal Stroke (Podcast)

Types and presentation may differ from adults, but early recognition and intervention are just as key

Two-dimensional scatter plot of peak T1 versus T2 times from pre-extended lumbar drainage MRI

MR Fingerprinting Predicts Shunt Efficacy in NPH

Study tests potential for a more accurate treatment predictor

person going into a Gamma Knife machine for radiotherapy
March 25, 2026/Neurosciences/Brain Tumor

Predicting Response to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma

Study uses molecular and clinical stratification to help guide patient selection

Ad