Locations:
Search IconSearch
February 20, 2018/Cancer

Development of a Model to Predict Likelihood of N2/3 Disease in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

When is EBUS-TBNA staging necessary?

17-PUL-3761-Almeida-Hero-Image-650x450pxl

By Francisco A. Almeida, MD, MS

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Determining the nodal status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without metastatic disease is crucial for defining the treatment plan. When mediastinal staging is indicated, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) lung cancer guidelines recommend a needle-based technique as the initial procedure of choice. Cleveland Clinic is one of the highest volume centers for endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedures in the nation with over 1,000 cases per year. In keeping with the ACCP guidelines, this is our preferred procedure for the diagnosis and staging of suspected or confirmed lung cancer that appears to be limited to the chest. While the indication to perform EBUS staging of the mediastinum is well established in certain situations based on current evidence (e.g., clinical N1-N3 disease based on CT alone or PET-CT findings), it may not be necessary in situations where the likelihood of N2 or N3 disease is very low.

In order to address ongoing uncertainties about the indications for EBUS staging, we sought to develop a model to predict the probability of finding N2 or N3 disease with EBUS. In conjunction with investigators from three other major U.S. hospitals, we performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patient undergoing EBUS-TBNA staging for NSCLC. Patients with recurrent NSCLC stage 4 disease, suspected or confirmed synchronous primaries, T4 tumors with direct mediastinal invasion, and those with small-cell lung cancer were excluded. A total of 1,533 patients with radiographic stage T1-3, N0-3, M0 disease who underwent staging EBUS-TBNA, and for whom PET scans were available, were included in the analysis. The primary analysis was performed on 633 patients and the external validations on 722 patients.

Advertisement

Younger age, location of the primary tumor within the central one third of the hemithorax, adenocarcinoma histology and higher nodal stage by CT and PET were associated with an increased probability of N2 or N3 disease on EBUS-TBNA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) for the primary analysis cohort and 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.91) for the external validation cohort.

In addition to determining the probability of finding N2 or N3 disease on EBUS-TBNA the model is also able to predict the presence of mediastinal disease when EBUS-TBNA nodal sampling is negative. Thus, the model is useful not only in determining which patients should undergo staging EBUS-TBNA but also which patients with negative EBUS-TBNA should go on to mediastinoscopy. For example, the probability of a false negative EBUS in a 70-year-old patient with a peripheral squamous cell carcinoma and radiographic stage 2 disease is sufficiently low to argue against a mediastinoscopy before definitive surgical resection or radiation therapy.

Our prediction model appears to perform better compared to existing models published to date to estimate mediastinal nodal involvement in patients with NSCLC. We believe the model will be very useful to both physicians and patients in developing an appropriate strategy for mediastinal staging.

Dr. Almeida is staff in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Researcher with microscope
June 26, 2026/Cancer

Testosterone May Offer Anti-Tumor Activity in Glioblastoma

Research findings offer clues for improving disease outcomes in men

Male patient with doctor
June 17, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Overcoming Taboos: Helping Men with Cancer Restore Sexual Health

Creating a safe space for patients

Masked patient with physician
June 15, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Managing Infection Risk in the Era of Cell Therapy

Long-term immune effects reshape preventative strategies and timelines

Immune checkpoint inhibitor illustration
June 12, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Immunotherapy Appears to Reduce the Risk of Secondary Primary Cancers

Large-scale database also reveals potential for immunotherapy to protect against cancer

T53 mutation illustration
June 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

TP53 Mutation Acquisition Timing Influences Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Findings may help guide discussions around prognosis and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Woman consoling another
June 5, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Equal Access to Modern Therapy May Help Eliminate Survival Differences in Multiple Myeloma

Research underscores the importance of access to timely diagnosis and treatment in this patient population.

Multiple myeloma cells
June 4, 2026/Cancer/Blood Cancers

Machine Learning Model Outperforms Standard Risk Tools for Multiple Myeloma

A Cleveland Clinic model combining clinical staging, genomics and AI predicts survival with 18% greater accuracy — and could help match patients to more effective treatments.

Dr. Kamath & colleagues in the lab
June 2, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Tissue Tumor Mutation Burden Outperforms Blood-Based Testing for Predicting Immunotherapy Response

Study serves as ‘cautionary tale’ for physicians tempted to rely on liquid biopsy results alone

Ad