May 23, 2014

Poor POISE-2 Results Mean It’s Back to Square One

Neither clonidine nor aspirin protected surgery patients from cardiac complications


Results of the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation 2 (POISE-2) trial, presented at the American College of Cardiology, were not favorable.


Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

POISE-2 was the largest clinical trial to address major cardiovascular complications in non-cardiac surgery. The factorial trial randomized 10,010 patients in 23 countries to low-dose clonidine vs placebo and to low-dose aspirin vs placebo. The primary end point was death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days.

Clonidine results

Patients randomized to clonidine were given 0.2 mg orally before surgery and daily transdermal patches that continued to deliver 0.2 mg/day for 72 hours after surgery. The control group received placebo pills or patches.

At 30 days, clonidine had not improved the primary outcome of mortality and nonfatal MI. In fact, a non-significant increase in MI was seen in the clonidine group, compared with placebo (329 vs 295). However, 48 percent of patients in the clonidine group experienced clinically important hypotension, vs 37 percent of placebo patients, and rates of nonfatal cardiac arrest were significantly greater in those taking clonidine (16) than placebo (5).

Aspirin arm

In the aspirin arm, patients taking aspirin daily for four of the six weeks before surgery were separated from those who did not take aspirin. Aspirin use was stopped 72 hours before surgery in all patients. Patients were then given 200 mg of aspirin immediately before surgery. After surgery, patients who had taken aspirin regularly before surgery took 100 mg or placebo for seven days, then resumed their prior aspirin regimen. Those who had not taken aspirin before surgery took 100 mg of aspirin or placebo for 30 days.

At 30 days, the rate of death or nonfatal MI was 7 percent in the aspirin group and 7.1 percent in the placebo group. However, aspirin-treated patients experienced significantly more clinically important bleeding, affecting 4.6 percent, compared with 3.8 percent in the placebo group.


What clinicians should do

About one-third of patients are taking aspirin when they enter the hospital for surgery, and the trend is to continue the aspirin through surgery. The authors recommend stopping this practice.

“It is clear from the POISE-2 results that aspirin should be discontinued, as it does not prevent MI and does promote serious bleeding,” says Cleveland Clinic’s Daniel I. Sessler, MD, coauthor of the study, which was published in the April 17, 2014, New England Journal of Medicine.

Patients who have had an infarction should presumably be started on aspirin and statins, if they do not already take the drugs — although neither treatment has been specifically tested in this context,” he adds.

A way of preventing postoperative MI has not yet been identified, but avoiding hypotension during and—and particularly after—surgery is likely critical, he says.

“A future study might seek to evaluate a drug that prevents tachycardia without causing much reduction in blood pressure,” he suggests.


Dr. Steven Nissen, Chairman of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Cleveland Clinic, suggests that patients with a strong indication for aspirin should be managed individually since “there may be populations in which stopping aspirin is more risky than continuing this therapy.”

Poise demonstrates clearly that the search for a safe, effective way to protect high-risk heart patients from cardiac complications after non-cardiac surgery must continue.

Related Articles

x-ray of bone fracture in a forearm
March 1, 2024
TRAVERSE Substudy Links Testosterone Therapy to Increased Fracture Risk in Older Men With Hypogonadism

Surprise findings argue for caution about testosterone use in men at risk for fracture

photo of intubated elderly woman in hospital bed
February 23, 2024
Proteomic Study Characterizes Markers of Frailty in Cardiovascular Disease and Their Links to Outcomes

Findings support emphasis on markers of frailty related to, but not dependent on, age

GettyImages-1252287413 [Converted]
September 8, 2023
Black Residents of Historically Redlined Areas Have Increased Heart Failure Risk

Large database study reveals lingering health consequences of decades-old discrimination

23-HVI-4172009 CQD 650×450-2
August 29, 2023
Updates From CLEAR Outcomes and VALOR-HCM: Expanded Benefits With Bempedoic Acid and Mavacamten

Additional analyses of the two trials presented at 2023 ESC Congress

January 6, 2022
Study Confirms Quality-of-Life Benefits of Myectomy in Obstructive HCM

Prospective SPIRIT-HCM trial demonstrates broad gains over 12-month follow-up

21-HVI-2211308 gender-scales_650x450
August 10, 2021
8 Ways to Increase Women’s Participation in Cardiovascular Trials

An ACC committee issues recommendations to accelerate sluggish progress

December 4, 2020
Carotid Endarterectomy and the High-Risk Patient

Review of our recent experience shows it’s still a safe option

November 30, 2020
AI Looms Large in New Studies of Heart Transplant Rejection and Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy

Machine learning may improve risk prediction and guide therapy