Locations:
Search IconSearch
October 21, 2015/Cancer/Research

Updated Nomogram Predicts Modern Outcomes After Salvage Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy

Study involved more than 3,000 patients at 10 institutions

ASTRO_690x380
Rahul Tendulkar, MD

Rahul Tendulkar, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

A contemporary update of a 2007 predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy offers a modernized forecast of cure compared to its predecessor.

“This (updated nomogram) can have an immediate impact by providing patients and clinicians with an accurate and personalized method of predicting their chances of successful treatment,” says Rahul D. Tendulkar, MD, of Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, lead author on the study that informs the nomogram update. “It may also help patients and clinicians decide whether to be more aggressive with treatment, or perhaps consider participating in a clinical trial. Also, it may help determine the urgency of treating patients sooner rather than later.”

Original nomogram was first of its kind

A nomogram incorporates multiple data points and returns a graphical computation, simplifying decision-making. The 2007 nomogram was the first of its kind for predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. It was created by Andrew J. Stephenson, MD, who is currently the Director of the Center for Urologic Oncology at Cleveland Clinic. It demonstrated that an increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was the initial sign of recurrent prostate cancer among patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).

SRT might eradicate locally recurrent cancer, but studies to distinguish local from systemic recurrence lacked sensitivity and specificity, Dr. Stephenson noted in 2007. The original nomogram predicted the probability of cancer control at six years after SRT for PSA-defined recurrence by evaluating markers such as cancer stage, tumor grade and PSA level.

Advertisement

Updated nomogram focuses on treatment at earlier signs of recurrence

The updated 2016 nomogram takes into account the more recent trend of treating patients at lower PSA levels than in the past (“early SRT”). Randomized trials published since the original nomogram was created have demonstrated the benefit of early SRT in high-risk patients.

“We found that treatment at lower PSA levels does indeed improve the chance of cure,” says Dr. Tendulkar. He describes the updated nomogram in an abstract presented to the 57th annual meeting of the American Society for Radiology Oncology (ASTRO) in San Antonio, Texas.

The 2016 study was a multi-institutional collaborative effort including more than 2,400 patients from 10 institutions. It represents the largest series in the literature regarding SRT after RP, Dr. Tendulkar says.

The retrospective cohort study examined 2,460 patients with a median follow-up of 5 years from the end of radiation. Early SRT was associated with improved freedom from biochemical failure and freedom from distant metastases.

The updated nomogram is designed to better estimate individual patient outcomes after SRT. “The nomogram can give an estimate of the five- and 10-year rates of developing (or not developing) a biochemical recurrence (by elevated PSA) or distant metastases,” says Dr. Tendulkar. “While we describe rates at specific benchmark times, in some cases late recurrences can indeed happen.”

New nomogram will be available to clinicians, patients worldwide

Once the study is published, the nomogram will be made available online at no charge. “Patients and clinicians worldwide can utilize the information to help make decisions regarding treatment,” says Dr. Tendulkar.

Advertisement

Were findings a surprise? “Our hypothesis was consistent with the study outcome,” he says. “We have known that certain factors can predict patient outcomes. This nomogram provides a more refined predictive tool than previously available.”

The next steps, says Dr. Tendulkar, will include conducting subset analyses to learn more about which patients need what kind of treatment. Ideally, clinical trials could be designed based on these findings.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Before and after scan
August 28, 2024/Cancer/Research
Case Study: Patient with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Has No Remaining Evidence of Disease

Treatment involved checkpoint inhibitor, surgery and intravesical therapy

Dr. Maciejewski
August 23, 2024/Cancer/Research
Studies Evaluate Anti-Complement Inhibitors for Treating Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Researchers Assess Real-Life Experiences of Patients Treated Outside of Clinical Trials

Dr. Raza
August 19, 2024/Cancer/Research
Understanding the Role of Palliative Care in AL Amyloidosis

Multi-specialty coordination essential for improving quality of life

Dr. Chirag Shah and colleague
August 12, 2024/Cancer/Research
DCISionRT Decision Score Predicts the Need of Radiation Therapy for Treating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Seven-gene biosignature becomes first effective means to reduce over- and under-treatment with radiation therapy

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
August 1, 2024/Cancer/Research
Emerging Second- and Third-Line Treatments Improve Outcomes in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

CAR T-cell therapy, bispecifics and antibody drug conjugates have changed disease management

genomic testing
July 30, 2024/Cancer/Research
New Research Highlights Novel Risk Stratification Model for Soft Tissue and Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Approach could help clinicians identify patients at an increased risk of progression who could benefit from more aggressive treatment

Dr. Holly Pederson
July 25, 2024/Cancer/Research
Evaluating Risk Scores for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Black Women (Podcast)

Polygenic risk score could help predict who will develop this aggressive breast cancer

Ad