Locations:
Search IconSearch
April 30, 2026/Cancer/Tumor Oncology

Bladder Cancer Treatment Takes Key Steps Forward

Pivotal Studies Guide Treatment Decisions in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Dr. Shilpa Gupta and patient

Two practice-changing studies are providing clinicians with data to better inform decisions for treating various populations with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

First treatment in decades for frail patients who are ineligible for platinum chemotherapy

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) administered perioperatively in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer resulted in a significant improvement in disease-free survival, along with unprecedented pathologic complete responses (pCR). In a phase 3 study, the combination therapy is the first to show demonstrable efficacy for patients not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy or who decline the treatment.

“Previously in bladder cancer, the best pathologic responses were 30-40% with gemcitabine cisplatin,” explains lead principal investigator Shilpa Gupta, MD, genitourinary oncologist at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute and Professor of Medicine at Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. “With EV/Pembro, those numbers jumped to 57%, which is remarkable, especially in this patient population.”

Background

“We already knew that there was a survival benefit for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery, but over half of patients aren’t candidates for cisplatin,” explains Dr. Gupta.

Patients with kidney or cardiac issues, neuropathy, hearing issues or poor ECOG status cannot take cisplatin. Bladder cancer patients have a median age of 71 years, and many have these comorbidities. Thus, treating these patients has historically been a challenge. Since the alternative, carboplatin, was not effective, patients in this situation typically received surgery alone. Disease burden was high and recurrence tended to occur quickly. Thus, there was a large unmet need for treating this population.

Advertisement

Study design

Of the patients enrolled in the study, 46% were 75 years of age or older and 82% had T3/T4 and N1 disease.

Patients were randomized to receive EV/pembro (three cycles of EV 1.26 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 and pembro 200 mg on day 1), followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, and then six cycles of EV and 14 cycles of pembro. Patients in the control arm were treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection alone. One hundred seventy patients were randomized to the EV/pembro arm and 174 patients to the control arm. Median follow-up was 25.6 months.

Study outcomes

Patients in the EV/pembro arm experienced significant improvements. Event-free survival was 15.7 months in the control arm and was not reached in the EV/pembro arm. Overall survival was 41.7 months in the control arm and was not reached in the EV/pembro arm.

In the control arm, pCR rates were 8.6%, compared to 57.1% in the EV/pembro arm.

“What is notable is the remarkable event-free survival and overall survival benefit and the pathologic complete response rates despite many patients having a high stage of disease, including some that were node positive,” says Dr. Gupta. “This study is significant because we now have effective treatment for frail patients.” Based in part on this study, EV/pembro received FDA approval in December 2025 and is now the new standard of care in this setting.

Only 67% of patients in the EV/pembro arm received the six cycles of adjuvant EV/pembro, either due to physician preferences or due to struggles recovering from surgery. Despite this, patients still benefited from the combination therapy.

Advertisement

The primary adverse events were rash and neuropathy. In the EV/pembro arm, 71.3% of patients experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related side effects, compared to 45.9% in the control arm. It is crucial to monitor for toxicity and dose reduce/discontinue promptly. "Despite only around two thirds of patients receiving adjuvant therapy, we saw a tremendous benefit," says Dr. Gupta.

Future studies should focus on treatment de-escalation, using tools like circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) and efforts for bladder preservation in those attaining clinical complete response.

First study to show role of circulating tumor DNA in informing adjuvant treatment decisions

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based detection of molecular residual disease may identify patients at high risk for recurrence after cystectomy who can benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy, thus sparing patients at lower risk from unnecessary treatment burden. In the phase 3 ImVigor011 trial, investigators monitored patients for up to a year after surgery via ctDNA testing. Those who tested ctDNA-positive during that time received atezolizumab administered intravenously or placebo every four weeks for one year.

Study design

In this study, 761 patients were enrolled, of which 250 patients tested ctDNA-positive. Of those, 167 were randomized to the atezolizumab arm and 83 to the placebo arm.

Study outcomes

The median disease-free survival was improved in patients receiving atezolizumab, at 9.9 months compared to 4.8 months in the placebo arm. The median overall survival was 32.8 in the atezolizumab arm compared to 21.1 months in the placebo arm. Of those patients who remained ctDNA-negative, disease-free survival was 88% at two years. The study outcomes were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Advertisement

“Looking forward, this data will help us optimize who will benefit from treatment and spare unnecessary toxicity and financial burden for patients who don’t need treatment,” says Dr. Gupta.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Timothy Gilligan
April 27, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Getting Tough Conversations Right in Cancer Care

Reflections from an oncology provider and communications educator on new ASCO Guidelines on Patient-Clinician Communication

p53 mutation illustration
April 22, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Study Holds Promise for Targeting Elusive P53 Gene Mutation

Phase 1 trial outcomes offer encouraging news for developing targeted therapy for solid tumors

Synovial sarcoma cells
April 20, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

T-Cell Receptor Therapy Available for Segment of Population with Synovia Sarcoma

Cleveland Clinic to administer first-of-its-kind T-cell therapy

Dr. Jagadeesh and patient
April 14, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Bispecific Antibody Shows Deep Remission in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Heavily pretreated patients experience improved progression-free survival and quality of life with CD20xCD3 therapy

Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy

Case Study: Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Bilateral Mastectomy Improves Outcomes

Innovative procedure reduces scarring, recovery time and nipple sensation

Doctor comforting patient
April 1, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

What Gets in the Way of End-of-Life Care Discussions?

Best practices for supporting patients with honesty and compassion

Hospice nurse with patient
March 10, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Centering End-of-Life Care Around What Matters Most

Goal-of-care discussions drive earlier hospice access

Dr. Lauren Kopicky headshot
March 4, 2026/Cancer/Podcast

Rethinking Axillary Management in Breast Cancer (Podcast)

Clinical trials and de-escalation strategies

Ad