Case Report: 3-Month Journey From Health to Multiorgan Transplant to Discharge

Young man saved multiple times by rapid collaborative response

A 36-year-old man with no remarkable medical history was transferred from an outside hospital to Cleveland Clinic with pulseless electrical activity, fulminant biventricular dysfunction (Figure) and severe malperfusion to multiple organs. Kidney and liver function were poor. The patient was immediately intubated and placed in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU).


Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“This patient was about as sick as possible at presentation,’” says Aaron Weiss, MD, PhD, the Cleveland Clinic cardiothoracic surgeon who saw the patient that day and was on his care team throughout his stay. “Fortunately, we have an extremely effective cardiogenic shock team that can be activated at once.”

The Cleveland Clinic shock team consists of a multidisciplinary group of experts who can be assembled rapidly for a conference call to consult on a patient to develop a lifesaving management strategy. Among those included on the call, often with others, are a heart failure cardiologist, a heart failure cardiac surgeon and an ICU physician. A senior member of the nursing staff also listens on the line to immediately organize room placement and care preparations as needed.

The shock team can also be accessed from outside the hospital to consult on patients not in the Cleveland Clinic system. This provides expertise to colleagues and facilitates transfer to Cleveland Clinic if appropriate.

Figure. Echocardiograms at presentation revealing severe biventricular dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation, also shown in the video below.

ECMO and Impella 5.5 placed for biventricular failure

The shock team determined that the patient needed aggressive acute lifesaving circulatory support to buy time and help salvage his organs. He was immediately placed on the following:

  • Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to provide full cardiopulmonary support and restore perfusion
  • An Impella 5.5® device via the right axillary artery to unload the left ventricle
  • Dialysis

The patient improved, and after two days, he was taken off ECMO. He was extubated a few days later. Although he made progress and his liver function improved, he remained on dialysis and stayed in the ICU with his heart fully dependent on the Impella 5.5 without evidence of heart recovery.


Major complications develop

Soon after, the patient developed what was suspected to be heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Initial testing was positive for HIT and he was empirically transitioned to bivalirudin therapy. The mechanical support kept the patient stable enough to wait for confirmatory testing, which was negative for HIT.

After a few weeks for further stabilization, the transplant team agreed to list him for heart and kidney transplantation due to end-stage cardiomyopathy with Impella dependence and continued renal failure. He was determined to be status 2 (hospitalized and on mechanical support).

Subsequently, the Impella device — which is not designed for use beyond more than a few weeks — failed, causing a stroke. In an emergency procedure, it was exchanged for a new one via the left axillary artery, and the patient recovered from his stroke within a few days.

Because of this complication, his transplant priority classification was upgraded to status 1 (critically ill and on mechanical support). “If the Impella failed again, it would have been much more difficult to place another device, putting his life in imminent danger without a good solution,” Dr. Weiss explains.

Heart-kidney transplant

Ten weeks after the patient initially presented, organs became available, and he underwent a heart transplant with successful removal of the Impella 5.5. He was returned to the ICU and then underwent a kidney transplant the following day.

“Heart-kidney transplant is an unusual combination, and we probably have just a handful or so of them every year at Cleveland Clinic,” says Ventakesh Krishnamurthi, MD, who performed the renal transplant in this case. “While the surgery itself was standard, the behind-the-scenes coordination for such a complex transplantation was anything but.”


The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged a few weeks later with excellent function in both transplanted organs. Three months after transplant he was doing well at home, undergoing physical therapy and expected to be able to resume full normal activities.

What saved this patient?

“This young man went from not knowing he was sick to being the sickest patient in the hospital, to walking out the door three months later with a new heart and kidney as well as a new lease on life,” says Dr. Weiss. “This amazing trajectory could only have happened at a large tertiary center like Cleveland Clinic that emphasizes collaborative, multidisciplinary care.”

The care team highlight the following pivotal points in his care:

  • Activating the cardiogenic shock team. “To have the ability to gather a multidisciplinary team of experts in minutes is critical when minutes really count,” says Pavan Bhat, MD, the heart failure cardiologist who participated in the initial cardiogenic shock call and was on the patient’s care team.
  • Initiating full mechanical support early. Immediately using combined ECMO and the Impella 5.5 spared the patient from developing further organ failure, which would likely have occurred had the team used a less aggressive approach.
  • Quickly and effectively dealing with severe complications. Suspected development of HIT and the Impella 5.5 malfunction were two major episodes with life-threatening potential. Quick action by the team and determination to continue care for this young patient led to a positive outcome in both situations.
  • A streamlined transplant process. Dr. Krishnamurthi emphasizes that because Cleveland Clinic conducts many complex operations, the process of obtaining and maintaining the donor organs and coordinating the surgeries was seamless. “Facilities, physicians and support staff are in the same area, allowing for excellent communication,” he explains. “This fosters the collaborative culture that was essential to saving this patient.”

That collaborative culture also promoted an additional key to success in this case: continuity of care. “The same team that placed this patient on mechanical support also performed his heart transplant and was involved with the kidney transplant by Dr. Krishnamurthi,” says Dr. Weiss. “That type of continuity can be invaluable in a complex case like this.”

Related Articles

intraoperative photo of robotic tracheobronchoplasty
Robotically Assisted Tracheobronchoplasty: A Case Study

Excessive dynamic airway collapse presenting as dyspnea and exercise intolerance in a 67-year-old

22-HVI-2987079 CQD 650×450
Off-Label Endovascular Intervention for Giant Aortic Arch Aneurysm: A Case Study

Necessity breeds innovation when patient doesn’t qualify for standard treatment or trials

22-HVI-3200903 CQD 650×450
Case Study: A Young Man With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy and Uncontrolled VT

After optimized medical and device therapy, is there a role for endocardial-epicardial VT ablation?

22-HVI-2958608-1 650×450
When the Ross Procedure Fails: Fifth Operation Offers Young Man a New Start

Fever and aortic root bleeding two decades post-Ross procedure

Case Study: When Lung Transplant Evaluation Reveals a Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

How to time the interventions, and how to manage anesthesia risks?

The Ross Procedure in a Reoperative Setting: A Case Study

A potentially definitive repair in a young woman with multiple prior surgeries

MIDCAB: A Case Study in Its Benefits, Considerations for Patient Selection

Matching the minimally invasive CABG alternative to the right candidates

A Longtime Alliance Partner Sees Benefits From Collaboration on Clinical Projects and Beyond

Initiatives cover everything from STS performance metrics to facility renovations