Locations:
Search IconSearch

Central Vein Sign on FLAIR* MRI Comparable to CSF Oligoclonal Bands for Diagnosing MS

Initial pilot study findings suggest a potential reduced need for cerebrospinal fluid testing

22-NEU-3409067_central-vein-sign_650x450

Detection of the central vein sign on brain imaging showed similar accuracy as oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) in a retrospective analysis of the Central Vein Sign in the Early Diagnosis of MS (CAVS-MS) pilot study.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The finding, reported in a poster presentation at the 38th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS 2022), is a notable boost for the potential utility of the central vein sign, a blood vessel seen within lesions in white matter on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequences.

“The diagnostic performance of the central vein sign detected by FLAIR* was similar to that of OCB in CSF,” says the study’s first author, Karlo Toljan, MD, a neurology resident at Cleveland Clinic. “Using the central vein sign as a diagnostic criterion may one day decrease the need for invasive CSF investigations and enable earlier and more accurate MS diagnosis.”

MS diagnosis is still inexact

The presence of OCB in CSF can serve to meet the requirement for dissemination in time in the 2017 McDonald criteria for diagnosing MS. However, the criteria were developed in patients with a typical presentation, and it is estimated that 20% of patients diagnosed with MS may have been incorrectly diagnosed, many times leading to unnecessary use of expensive and sometimes risky medications.

The central vein sign — best detected using FLAIR* (i.e., combining FLAIR with high-resolution contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted imaging for detection of central veins) — is increasingly recognized as a new biomarker that might improve diagnostic accuracy and may reduce the need for obtaining a CSF sample.

The large, prospective multicenter CAVS-MS study (NCT04495556), for which Cleveland Clinic is the coordinating center, is currently underway to evaluate the central vein sign’s potential utility for diagnosing MS (as summarized in a previous Consult QD post). The study is designed to include 400 patients with typical clinical presentations and atypical presentations. Patients will be followed clinically and undergo FLAIR* imaging and other diagnostic testing at baseline and at 24 months.

Advertisement

Pilot study methods and subanalysis results

The pilot study for CAVS-MS was primarily designed to optimize and harmonize FLAIR* MRI — a technique that has been in development for several years — at 10 sites in North America. This subanalysis compared the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of central vein sign quantification to OCB in CSF for diagnosing MS at baseline and 12 months. Post-gadolinium FLAIR* images were rated as either Select-3* or Select-6* — i.e., containing at least three or at least six central vein sign lesions per scan.

The cohort consisted of approximately 100 participants, of whom 53 had undergone CSF testing for clinical purposes in addition to MRI ratings for central vein sign; of this latter group, 24 patients (45%) met 2017 McDonald criteria for MS at initial presentation, and an additional three patients met the diagnostic criteria at 12-month follow-up.

Key results were as follows:

  • No significant differences in sensitivity for diagnosing MS were found between OCB, Select-3* and Select-6* methods.
  • OCB and Select-6* were more specific than Select-3* (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001, respectively).
  • Specificity of OCB and Select-6* did not differ significantly.
  • Positive predictive values at 12 months were as follows:
    • 84% for OCB (95% CI, 64%-95%)
    • 63% for Select-3* (95% CI, 45%-78%)
    • 95% for Select-6* (95% CI, 76%-99%)
    • 100% for the combination of OCB and Select-6* (95% CI, 80%-100%)

“In most patients, the central vein sign was concordant with OCB determination for dissemination in time,” says Daniel Ontaneda, MD, PhD, the principal investigator of the Cleveland Clinic site for the CAVS-MS trial and a neurologist with Cleveland Clinic’s Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research and Treatment.

Stay tuned for more-conclusive data

Dr. Ontaneda emphasizes that the complete CAVS-MS trial will provide more definitive results, with a larger study population and longer follow-up period. He expects preliminary results to be available mid-2023 and final results in 2026.

“Will the central vein sign turn out to be a sufficiently specific biomarker that we can forego additional tests, including a spinal tap, in most patients?” asks Dr. Ontaneda. “This is the pressing question that we need to answer and is especially important for those with atypical presentations.”

Advertisement

He adds that he would like for neurologists to one day be able to diagnose MS easily and accurately based just on MRI results, similar to how cardiologists now diagnose heart disease using echocardiography rather than their past reliance on symptoms or exam findings, for example.

“The old way of diagnosing heart disease was analogous to how we currently use the McDonald criteria to diagnose MS,” he explains. “It involves a complicated set of rules and is not completely accurate if not applied correctly. I would ultimately like to have an imaging test with high sensitivity and specificity for MS, simplifying the process and ensuring a correct diagnosis.”

Image at top: Representative brain MRI with lesions showing the central vein sign.

Advertisement

Related Articles

central vein sign on a brain MRI
CAVS-MS Advances Quest to Improve the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

New reports focus on neuroimaging biomarkers and features of atypical presentations

vial of blood labeled "neurofilament light chain"
Could Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Level Help Guide MS Management?

Perhaps, with caveats: sNfL elevation has low sensitivity and lags MRI activity by at least a month

neuron affected by neuromyelitis optica
Novel Monoclonal Antibodies for NMOSD Show Strong Efficacy and Safety in Real-World Study

Early experience with the agents confirms findings from clinical trials

histology image of a gray matter lesion in a multiple sclerosis brain
Study Suggests Protective Role for Microglia at Borders of Gray Matter Lesions in Progressive MS

Findings challenge dogma that microglia are exclusively destructive regardless of location in brain

illustration of a neuron affected by multiple sclerosis
Clinical Trials in Progressive MS: An Assessment of Advances and Remaining Challenges

New review distills insights from studies over the past decade

photo of doctor performing neurologic exam on a patient
A New Guide to the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

Updated consensus approach helps clinicians efficiently improve diagnostic accuracy

23-NEU-4060108_pregnancy-care-visit_650x450
Reproductive Issues and Multiple Sclerosis: 20 Frequently Asked Questions

The disease is not a barrier to pregnancy, but risks from disease-modifying therapies must be managed

23-NEU-3813861 multiple-sclerosis-patient_650x450
How the SPRINT-MS Follow-On Study Aims to Enhance Future Trials of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

In search of optimal imaging biomarkers, best methods for long-term follow-up

Ad