June 30, 2022/Cancer/Research

Combination Therapy Shows Promise for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Phase 2 study of parsaclisib with ruxolitinib demonstrates improved efficacy for patients previously treated with ruxolitinib alone

22-CNR-2930071-CQD-Hero-650×450 Parsaclisib and Rux

A phase 2 study of the combination of the PI3K inhibitor parsaclisib and the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (Jakafi™) in patients with myelofibrosis showed improvements beyond what would be expected with ruxolitinib alone, according to research findings presented at the 2022 European Hematology Association meeting. Additionally, researchers found the combination showed no unexpected increase in toxicity.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Ruxolitinib has been revolutionary in the way we treat myelofibrosis, but the challenge is that it doesn’t work for everyone and it doesn’t work forever,” says study co-author Aaron T. Gerds, MD, a staff physician with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and Associate Professor of Medicine. (Hematology and Medical Oncology) with the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. “Roughly 40% of patients achieve a strong response in terms of symptom burden and spleen volume reduction, therefore 60% have a suboptimal response. Our goal is to focus on that unmet need.”

While the original COMFORT studies showed a median duration of treatment with ruxolitinib of 3.2 years, real-world analysis revealed the timeframe to be closer to 18 months. Researchers are seeking ways to improve upon this.

Addressing persistent PI3K pathway activation

Knowing that the PI3K pathway is important in pathogenesis and promoting the survival of myelofibrosis cells and is dysregulated in myelofibrosis cells, researchers at Cleveland Clinic and their collaborators postulated that adding a PI3K inhibitor to ruxolitinib could help regain response in patients who either never achieved an optimal response or are seeing a waning response from their current therapy.

Advertisement

Study results

Patients in the study had previously been treated with ruxolitinib alone. The study showed indications of improvements in symptom burden as well as spleen size reduction in patients receiving the combination therapy.

These proportional improvements in symptoms were achieved without excess toxicity. Phase 3 trials will continue to assess the durability of these responses.

Measuring clinical improvement

Dr. Gerds notes that reconsideration of standard metrics may be warranted in gauging patients’ response to therapy. “In the past, the field of myelofibrosis has been beholden to a threshold of 35% spleen reduction and 50% symptom burden improvement because the original ruxolitinib trials used those as the endpoints. However, using tools like patient global impression of change may better quantify actual improvements. If, for example, a patient had a 34% reduction in spleen volume, they are likely to experience virtually the same benefit as someone who had a spleen reduction of 35%, yet standard metrics wouldn’t quantify the first patient as having a response. We need to rethink this.”

Advertisement

The future of combination therapy

Numerous large prospective randomized phase 3 trials are now underway for treating myelofibrosis. “As we move forward in the next two or three years, we’ll see more of these trials read out, and I think combination therapy for this disease is in the not-so-distant future,” says Dr. Gerds. “I look forward to seeing a larger proportion of patients having a better functional status and potentially improving overall survival. That may not necessarily mean directly reversing scar tissue in the bone marrow or killing off myelofibrosis cells, but it can result in dramatic improvements in people’s quality of life.”

Related Articles

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024/Cancer/Research
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024/Cancer/Research
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024/Cancer/Research
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024/Cancer/Research
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

24-CNR-4545611-CQD-Podcast-967×544
February 1, 2024/Cancer/Research
Possibilities of CRISPR Technology (Podcast)

Gene editing technology offers promise for treating multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies, as well as solid tumors

Disparities in multiple myeloma
January 25, 2024/Cancer/Research
Major Study Identifies Global Disparities in Drug Toxicity for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Study of 401,576 patients reveals differences in cancer burdens as well as overall survival

Dr. Shilpa Gupta
December 27, 2023/Cancer/Research
A New Standard Emerges in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Decades of First-Line Chemotherapy

Enfortumab plus pembrolizumab reduced risk of death by 53% compared with platinum-based chemotherapy

Ad